On modelling disordered crystal structures through restraints from molecule-in-cluster computations, and distinguishing static and dynamic disorder

Distinguishing disorder into static and dynamic based on multi-temperature X-ray or neutron diffraction experiments is the current state of the art, but is only descriptive, not predictive. Here, several disordered structures are revisited from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center `drug subset...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Birger Dittrich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Union of Crystallography 2021-03-01
Series:IUCrJ
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S2052252521000531
_version_ 1798031347434913792
author Birger Dittrich
author_facet Birger Dittrich
author_sort Birger Dittrich
collection DOAJ
description Distinguishing disorder into static and dynamic based on multi-temperature X-ray or neutron diffraction experiments is the current state of the art, but is only descriptive, not predictive. Here, several disordered structures are revisited from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center `drug subset', the Cambridge Structural Database and own earlier work, where experimental intensities of Bragg diffraction data were available. Using the molecule-in-cluster approach, structures with distinguishable conformations were optimized separately, as extracted from available or generated disorder models of the respective disordered crystal structures. Re-combining these `archetype structures' by restraining positional and constraining displacement parameters for conventional least-squares refinement, based on the optimized geometries, then often achieves a superior fit to the experimental diffraction data compared with relying on experimental information alone. It also simplifies and standardizes disorder refinement. Ten example structures were analysed. It is observed that energy differences between separate disorder conformations are usually within a small energy window of RT (T = crystallization temperature). Further computations classify disorder into static or dynamic, using single experiments performed at one single temperature, and this was achieved for propionamide.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T19:55:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-97ae99adce184b9b80eecfe83830933b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2052-2525
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T19:55:01Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher International Union of Crystallography
record_format Article
series IUCrJ
spelling doaj.art-97ae99adce184b9b80eecfe83830933b2022-12-22T04:06:06ZengInternational Union of CrystallographyIUCrJ2052-25252021-03-018230531810.1107/S2052252521000531fc5050On modelling disordered crystal structures through restraints from molecule-in-cluster computations, and distinguishing static and dynamic disorderBirger Dittrich0Novartis Campus, Novartis Pharma AG, Postfach, Basel, CH-4002, SwitzerlandDistinguishing disorder into static and dynamic based on multi-temperature X-ray or neutron diffraction experiments is the current state of the art, but is only descriptive, not predictive. Here, several disordered structures are revisited from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center `drug subset', the Cambridge Structural Database and own earlier work, where experimental intensities of Bragg diffraction data were available. Using the molecule-in-cluster approach, structures with distinguishable conformations were optimized separately, as extracted from available or generated disorder models of the respective disordered crystal structures. Re-combining these `archetype structures' by restraining positional and constraining displacement parameters for conventional least-squares refinement, based on the optimized geometries, then often achieves a superior fit to the experimental diffraction data compared with relying on experimental information alone. It also simplifies and standardizes disorder refinement. Ten example structures were analysed. It is observed that energy differences between separate disorder conformations are usually within a small energy window of RT (T = crystallization temperature). Further computations classify disorder into static or dynamic, using single experiments performed at one single temperature, and this was achieved for propionamide.http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S2052252521000531quantum crystallographycrystal structuresdisorder refinementmolecule-in-cluster optimizations
spellingShingle Birger Dittrich
On modelling disordered crystal structures through restraints from molecule-in-cluster computations, and distinguishing static and dynamic disorder
IUCrJ
quantum crystallography
crystal structures
disorder refinement
molecule-in-cluster optimizations
title On modelling disordered crystal structures through restraints from molecule-in-cluster computations, and distinguishing static and dynamic disorder
title_full On modelling disordered crystal structures through restraints from molecule-in-cluster computations, and distinguishing static and dynamic disorder
title_fullStr On modelling disordered crystal structures through restraints from molecule-in-cluster computations, and distinguishing static and dynamic disorder
title_full_unstemmed On modelling disordered crystal structures through restraints from molecule-in-cluster computations, and distinguishing static and dynamic disorder
title_short On modelling disordered crystal structures through restraints from molecule-in-cluster computations, and distinguishing static and dynamic disorder
title_sort on modelling disordered crystal structures through restraints from molecule in cluster computations and distinguishing static and dynamic disorder
topic quantum crystallography
crystal structures
disorder refinement
molecule-in-cluster optimizations
url http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S2052252521000531
work_keys_str_mv AT birgerdittrich onmodellingdisorderedcrystalstructuresthroughrestraintsfrommoleculeinclustercomputationsanddistinguishingstaticanddynamicdisorder