Difference of periodontal implication between self⁃ligating bracket and conventional bracket
Objective To compare the influences on periodontal condition between self⁃ligating brackets and con⁃ ventional brackets. Methods A total of 120 subjects (age range between twelve and sixteen) were selected which were averaged into four groups (C, S1, S2, S3) at random by different bracket types. G...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | zho |
| Published: |
Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
2016-11-01
|
| Series: | 口腔疾病防治 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.kqjbfz.com/EN/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2016.11.008 |
| _version_ | 1819229566929993728 |
|---|---|
| author | QIN Hang⁃lin ZHOU Hang WANG Hai⁃ren CAI Ping |
| author_facet | QIN Hang⁃lin ZHOU Hang WANG Hai⁃ren CAI Ping |
| author_sort | QIN Hang⁃lin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective To compare the influences on periodontal condition between self⁃ligating brackets and con⁃
ventional brackets. Methods A total of 120 subjects (age range between twelve and sixteen) were selected which were
averaged into four groups (C, S1, S2, S3) at random by different bracket types. Group C included 40 patients with con⁃
ventionally⁃ligated bracket as control group, and the others (S1, S2, S3) included 40 patients respectively with self⁃ligat⁃
ing brackets as experimental groups. Before treatment and 1, 3, 6 months after beginning of treatment respectively, the
periodontal parameters PLI, GI, PD were examined. Results There was no significant difference between the 4 groups
between T0⁃T1. 3, 6 months after the orthodontic treatment, no matter conventionally⁃ligated bracket or self⁃ligating
brackets, the periodontal parameters PLI, GI of the tested teeth increased significantly than before, however, the values
of PD did not show any significant difference. Three and six months after beginning of treatment, PL, SBI, PD between
the conventional and self⁃ligating groups have significant differences (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant
differences at all the time intervals between the self⁃ligating brackets groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion The self⁃ligating brackets have an advantage over conventional brackets with respect to the periodontal improving of control of plaque
and gingival bleeding, but not for periodontal pocket depth. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-23T11:15:13Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-97bd347d836b4bab88820f572fd62219 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2096-1456 2096-1456 |
| language | zho |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-23T11:15:13Z |
| publishDate | 2016-11-01 |
| publisher | Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases |
| record_format | Article |
| series | 口腔疾病防治 |
| spelling | doaj.art-97bd347d836b4bab88820f572fd622192022-12-21T17:49:14ZzhoEditorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases口腔疾病防治2096-14562096-14562016-11-01241166166410.12016/j.issn.2096⁃1456.2016.11.008Difference of periodontal implication between self⁃ligating bracket and conventional bracketQIN Hang⁃lin0ZHOU Hang1WANG Hai⁃ren2CAI Ping3Department of Orthodontics, Yantai StomatologyDepartment of Orthodontics, Yantai StomatologyDepartment of Orthodontics, Yantai StomatologyDepartment of Orthodontics, Stomatological Hospital of Wuhan UniversityObjective To compare the influences on periodontal condition between self⁃ligating brackets and con⁃ ventional brackets. Methods A total of 120 subjects (age range between twelve and sixteen) were selected which were averaged into four groups (C, S1, S2, S3) at random by different bracket types. Group C included 40 patients with con⁃ ventionally⁃ligated bracket as control group, and the others (S1, S2, S3) included 40 patients respectively with self⁃ligat⁃ ing brackets as experimental groups. Before treatment and 1, 3, 6 months after beginning of treatment respectively, the periodontal parameters PLI, GI, PD were examined. Results There was no significant difference between the 4 groups between T0⁃T1. 3, 6 months after the orthodontic treatment, no matter conventionally⁃ligated bracket or self⁃ligating brackets, the periodontal parameters PLI, GI of the tested teeth increased significantly than before, however, the values of PD did not show any significant difference. Three and six months after beginning of treatment, PL, SBI, PD between the conventional and self⁃ligating groups have significant differences (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences at all the time intervals between the self⁃ligating brackets groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion The self⁃ligating brackets have an advantage over conventional brackets with respect to the periodontal improving of control of plaque and gingival bleeding, but not for periodontal pocket depth.http://www.kqjbfz.com/EN/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2016.11.008Self⁃ligating brackets，Conventional brackets，Periodontal status，Periodontal parameters，Plague index， |
| spellingShingle | QIN Hang⁃lin ZHOU Hang WANG Hai⁃ren CAI Ping Difference of periodontal implication between self⁃ligating bracket and conventional bracket 口腔疾病防治 Self⁃ligating brackets， Conventional brackets， Periodontal status， Periodontal parameters， Plague index， |
| title | Difference of periodontal implication between self⁃ligating bracket and conventional bracket |
| title_full | Difference of periodontal implication between self⁃ligating bracket and conventional bracket |
| title_fullStr | Difference of periodontal implication between self⁃ligating bracket and conventional bracket |
| title_full_unstemmed | Difference of periodontal implication between self⁃ligating bracket and conventional bracket |
| title_short | Difference of periodontal implication between self⁃ligating bracket and conventional bracket |
| title_sort | difference of periodontal implication between self⁃ligating bracket and conventional bracket |
| topic | Self⁃ligating brackets， Conventional brackets， Periodontal status， Periodontal parameters， Plague index， |
| url | http://www.kqjbfz.com/EN/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2016.11.008 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT qinhanglin differenceofperiodontalimplicationbetweenselfligatingbracketandconventionalbracket AT zhouhang differenceofperiodontalimplicationbetweenselfligatingbracketandconventionalbracket AT wanghairen differenceofperiodontalimplicationbetweenselfligatingbracketandconventionalbracket AT caiping differenceofperiodontalimplicationbetweenselfligatingbracketandconventionalbracket |