Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In order to carry out a methodological research survey of systematic reviews of adverse effects we needed to retrieve a sample of systematic reviews in which the primary outcome is an adverse effect or effects.</p> <p>Met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McIntosh Heather M, Golder Su, Loke Yoon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-05-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/6/22
_version_ 1811298557642145792
author McIntosh Heather M
Golder Su
Loke Yoon
author_facet McIntosh Heather M
Golder Su
Loke Yoon
author_sort McIntosh Heather M
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In order to carry out a methodological research survey of systematic reviews of adverse effects we needed to retrieve a sample of systematic reviews in which the primary outcome is an adverse effect or effects.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We carried out searches of the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) for systematic reviews of adverse effects published between 1994 to 2005. The search strategies used a combination of text words in the title and abstract, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and subheadings/qualifiers. In addition, DARE records in progress were hand searched. No language restrictions were placed on any of the searches. The performance, in terms of sensitivity and precision, of the search strategies and their combinations were tested in DARE and CDSR.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In total 3635 records were screened of which 257 met our inclusion criteria. The precision of the searches in CDSR was low (0% to 3%), and no one search strategy could retrieve all the relevant records in either DARE or CDSR. Hand searching the records from DARE and CDSR not retrieved by our searches indicated that we had missed relevant systematic reviews in both DARE and CDSR. The sensitivities of many of the search combinations were comparable to those found when searching for primary studies in which adverse effects are secondary outcomes.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Searching major databases of systematic reviews, for systematic reviews of adverse effects, proved more difficult than anticipated due to a lack of standard terminology used by the authors, inadequate indexing and the variations in the search interfaces of the databases. At present hand searching all records in DARE and CDSR seems to be the only way to ensure retrieval of all systematic reviews of adverse effects in these databases.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T06:21:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-97c020930cc943fb9ec8d3955807b402
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2288
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T06:21:57Z
publishDate 2006-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
spelling doaj.art-97c020930cc943fb9ec8d3955807b4022022-12-22T02:58:37ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882006-05-01612210.1186/1471-2288-6-22Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventionsMcIntosh Heather MGolder SuLoke Yoon<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In order to carry out a methodological research survey of systematic reviews of adverse effects we needed to retrieve a sample of systematic reviews in which the primary outcome is an adverse effect or effects.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We carried out searches of the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) for systematic reviews of adverse effects published between 1994 to 2005. The search strategies used a combination of text words in the title and abstract, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and subheadings/qualifiers. In addition, DARE records in progress were hand searched. No language restrictions were placed on any of the searches. The performance, in terms of sensitivity and precision, of the search strategies and their combinations were tested in DARE and CDSR.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In total 3635 records were screened of which 257 met our inclusion criteria. The precision of the searches in CDSR was low (0% to 3%), and no one search strategy could retrieve all the relevant records in either DARE or CDSR. Hand searching the records from DARE and CDSR not retrieved by our searches indicated that we had missed relevant systematic reviews in both DARE and CDSR. The sensitivities of many of the search combinations were comparable to those found when searching for primary studies in which adverse effects are secondary outcomes.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Searching major databases of systematic reviews, for systematic reviews of adverse effects, proved more difficult than anticipated due to a lack of standard terminology used by the authors, inadequate indexing and the variations in the search interfaces of the databases. At present hand searching all records in DARE and CDSR seems to be the only way to ensure retrieval of all systematic reviews of adverse effects in these databases.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/6/22
spellingShingle McIntosh Heather M
Golder Su
Loke Yoon
Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions
BMC Medical Research Methodology
title Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions
title_full Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions
title_fullStr Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions
title_full_unstemmed Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions
title_short Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions
title_sort identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/6/22
work_keys_str_mv AT mcintoshheatherm identifyingsystematicreviewsoftheadverseeffectsofhealthcareinterventions
AT goldersu identifyingsystematicreviewsoftheadverseeffectsofhealthcareinterventions
AT lokeyoon identifyingsystematicreviewsoftheadverseeffectsofhealthcareinterventions