Small airways dysfunction: The importance of utilising Z-scores to define MMEF abnormalities in clinical practice

Background: The small airways comprise the largest cross-sectional area of the lungs, however, assessing and reporting abnormalities for this region of the bronchial tree has been practically and scientifically uncertain. Methods: Using routinely collected spirometry data for patients with either as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammed A. Almeshari, Nowaf Y. Alobaidi, Elizabeth Sapey, Robert A. Stockley, James A. Stockley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-10-01
Series:Heliyon
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023079525
_version_ 1797646463189123072
author Mohammed A. Almeshari
Nowaf Y. Alobaidi
Elizabeth Sapey
Robert A. Stockley
James A. Stockley
author_facet Mohammed A. Almeshari
Nowaf Y. Alobaidi
Elizabeth Sapey
Robert A. Stockley
James A. Stockley
author_sort Mohammed A. Almeshari
collection DOAJ
description Background: The small airways comprise the largest cross-sectional area of the lungs, however, assessing and reporting abnormalities for this region of the bronchial tree has been practically and scientifically uncertain. Methods: Using routinely collected spirometry data for patients with either asthma or COPD, the accuracy of % predicted values for defining small airways dysfunction was assessed. A z-score of ≤ −1.645 of the maximal-mid expiratory flow (MMEF) was used as the gold standard for defining abnormality in the small airways. Results: Records of 3396 patients were included in the analysis. The false positive (FP) rates were 24.6 %, 16.1 %, 11.5 %, or 7.9 % when the % predicted value of 80 %, 70 %, 65 %, or 60 % were used, respectively. Sex, age, and BMI were associated with FP rates. Males were more likely to be categorised as FP with odds ratio (OR) between 1.10 and 1.49 across % predicted groups. Age was associated with FP rates with an OR between 1.01 and 1.08. The BMI was also associated with FP rates with an OR of 1.03 across all % predicted groups. Assessing the association of age groups with FP rate showed that those above 60 years old were more likely to be categorised as FP with an OR between 1.23 and 73.2 compared to those less than 30 years old. Conclusion: When assessing the small airways in clinical practice or for scientific purposes, the % predicted values overestimate the actual impairment leading to FP interpretation. Utilising z-score values are recommended to assess the small airways using the spirometric index, MMEF.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T15:02:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-97c2e2af4c784a18acf30fbb524c1131
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-8440
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T15:02:59Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heliyon
spelling doaj.art-97c2e2af4c784a18acf30fbb524c11312023-10-30T06:07:13ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402023-10-01910e20744Small airways dysfunction: The importance of utilising Z-scores to define MMEF abnormalities in clinical practiceMohammed A. Almeshari0Nowaf Y. Alobaidi1Elizabeth Sapey2Robert A. Stockley3James A. Stockley4Rehabilitation Health Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK; Corresponding author. Rehabilitation Health Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Respiratory Therapy Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdul-Aziz University for Health Sciences, Al Ahsa, Saudi ArabiaInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UKDepartment of Lung Function and Sleep, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UKDepartment of Lung Function and Sleep, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UKBackground: The small airways comprise the largest cross-sectional area of the lungs, however, assessing and reporting abnormalities for this region of the bronchial tree has been practically and scientifically uncertain. Methods: Using routinely collected spirometry data for patients with either asthma or COPD, the accuracy of % predicted values for defining small airways dysfunction was assessed. A z-score of ≤ −1.645 of the maximal-mid expiratory flow (MMEF) was used as the gold standard for defining abnormality in the small airways. Results: Records of 3396 patients were included in the analysis. The false positive (FP) rates were 24.6 %, 16.1 %, 11.5 %, or 7.9 % when the % predicted value of 80 %, 70 %, 65 %, or 60 % were used, respectively. Sex, age, and BMI were associated with FP rates. Males were more likely to be categorised as FP with odds ratio (OR) between 1.10 and 1.49 across % predicted groups. Age was associated with FP rates with an OR between 1.01 and 1.08. The BMI was also associated with FP rates with an OR of 1.03 across all % predicted groups. Assessing the association of age groups with FP rate showed that those above 60 years old were more likely to be categorised as FP with an OR between 1.23 and 73.2 compared to those less than 30 years old. Conclusion: When assessing the small airways in clinical practice or for scientific purposes, the % predicted values overestimate the actual impairment leading to FP interpretation. Utilising z-score values are recommended to assess the small airways using the spirometric index, MMEF.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023079525SpirometryZ-scoreStandardised residualSmall airwaysFEF25-75MMEF
spellingShingle Mohammed A. Almeshari
Nowaf Y. Alobaidi
Elizabeth Sapey
Robert A. Stockley
James A. Stockley
Small airways dysfunction: The importance of utilising Z-scores to define MMEF abnormalities in clinical practice
Heliyon
Spirometry
Z-score
Standardised residual
Small airways
FEF25-75
MMEF
title Small airways dysfunction: The importance of utilising Z-scores to define MMEF abnormalities in clinical practice
title_full Small airways dysfunction: The importance of utilising Z-scores to define MMEF abnormalities in clinical practice
title_fullStr Small airways dysfunction: The importance of utilising Z-scores to define MMEF abnormalities in clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Small airways dysfunction: The importance of utilising Z-scores to define MMEF abnormalities in clinical practice
title_short Small airways dysfunction: The importance of utilising Z-scores to define MMEF abnormalities in clinical practice
title_sort small airways dysfunction the importance of utilising z scores to define mmef abnormalities in clinical practice
topic Spirometry
Z-score
Standardised residual
Small airways
FEF25-75
MMEF
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023079525
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedaalmeshari smallairwaysdysfunctiontheimportanceofutilisingzscorestodefinemmefabnormalitiesinclinicalpractice
AT nowafyalobaidi smallairwaysdysfunctiontheimportanceofutilisingzscorestodefinemmefabnormalitiesinclinicalpractice
AT elizabethsapey smallairwaysdysfunctiontheimportanceofutilisingzscorestodefinemmefabnormalitiesinclinicalpractice
AT robertastockley smallairwaysdysfunctiontheimportanceofutilisingzscorestodefinemmefabnormalitiesinclinicalpractice
AT jamesastockley smallairwaysdysfunctiontheimportanceofutilisingzscorestodefinemmefabnormalitiesinclinicalpractice