The “PRO-N” clitic en / ne and the theory of cliticization

The Romance pro-N clitic (Fr., Cat.) en / (It.) ne is problematic for most theories of cliticization,because some phenomena support a movement analysis, while others seem to speak against movement.Endorsing the view that the pro-N clitic is the result of movement, this paper1 argues that the problem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ion Giurgea
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti 2012-01-01
Series:Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://bwpl.unibuc.ro/index.pl/the_pro-n_clitic_en_/_ne_and_the_theory_of_cliticization
_version_ 1819026479706537984
author Ion Giurgea
author_facet Ion Giurgea
author_sort Ion Giurgea
collection DOAJ
description The Romance pro-N clitic (Fr., Cat.) en / (It.) ne is problematic for most theories of cliticization,because some phenomena support a movement analysis, while others seem to speak against movement.Endorsing the view that the pro-N clitic is the result of movement, this paper1 argues that the problems of thisanalysis can be solved by assuming that this clitic does not represent an N or NP, but rather a functional headintermediate between D/Q and N (probably Num), whose complement is empty after the DP-phase iscompleted. Consequently, I propose that the theory of cliticization should be modified in order to allow“dynamic minimality”: only minimal elements may cliticize, but non-minimal elements may become minimalin the course of the derivation, if their complement has a null spell-out.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T05:27:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-97c3c7bb55d848f594dd04462f0780b8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2069-9239
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T05:27:14Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti
record_format Article
series Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics
spelling doaj.art-97c3c7bb55d848f594dd04462f0780b82022-12-21T19:14:39ZengEditura Universitatii din BucurestiBucharest Working Papers in Linguistics2069-92392012-01-01XIV13956The “PRO-N” clitic en / ne and the theory of cliticizationIon GiurgeaThe Romance pro-N clitic (Fr., Cat.) en / (It.) ne is problematic for most theories of cliticization,because some phenomena support a movement analysis, while others seem to speak against movement.Endorsing the view that the pro-N clitic is the result of movement, this paper1 argues that the problems of thisanalysis can be solved by assuming that this clitic does not represent an N or NP, but rather a functional headintermediate between D/Q and N (probably Num), whose complement is empty after the DP-phase iscompleted. Consequently, I propose that the theory of cliticization should be modified in order to allow“dynamic minimality”: only minimal elements may cliticize, but non-minimal elements may become minimalin the course of the derivation, if their complement has a null spell-out.http://bwpl.unibuc.ro/index.pl/the_pro-n_clitic_en_/_ne_and_the_theory_of_cliticizationcliticsnominal ellipsisDP syntaxX0-statusRomance
spellingShingle Ion Giurgea
The “PRO-N” clitic en / ne and the theory of cliticization
Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics
clitics
nominal ellipsis
DP syntax
X0-status
Romance
title The “PRO-N” clitic en / ne and the theory of cliticization
title_full The “PRO-N” clitic en / ne and the theory of cliticization
title_fullStr The “PRO-N” clitic en / ne and the theory of cliticization
title_full_unstemmed The “PRO-N” clitic en / ne and the theory of cliticization
title_short The “PRO-N” clitic en / ne and the theory of cliticization
title_sort pro n clitic en ne and the theory of cliticization
topic clitics
nominal ellipsis
DP syntax
X0-status
Romance
url http://bwpl.unibuc.ro/index.pl/the_pro-n_clitic_en_/_ne_and_the_theory_of_cliticization
work_keys_str_mv AT iongiurgea theproncliticenneandthetheoryofcliticization
AT iongiurgea proncliticenneandthetheoryofcliticization