Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements after LASEK by three instruments

AIM: To compare the differences and the relationships of central corneal thickness(CCT)measurements among optical coherence tomography(OCT), Tomey pachymetry and ultrasound pachymetry after laser assisted subepithelial keratomileusis(LASEK). <p>METHODS:Forty-nine patients(96 eyes)with myopia a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiao-Juan Peng, Ye Tian, Si-Ying Liu, Ji-Sheng Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2014-03-01
Series:Guoji Yanke Zazhi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2014/3/201403026.pdf
_version_ 1818547436564512768
author Xiao-Juan Peng
Ye Tian
Si-Ying Liu
Ji-Sheng Chen
author_facet Xiao-Juan Peng
Ye Tian
Si-Ying Liu
Ji-Sheng Chen
author_sort Xiao-Juan Peng
collection DOAJ
description AIM: To compare the differences and the relationships of central corneal thickness(CCT)measurements among optical coherence tomography(OCT), Tomey pachymetry and ultrasound pachymetry after laser assisted subepithelial keratomileusis(LASEK). <p>METHODS:Forty-nine patients(96 eyes)with myopia after 6mo of LASEK were assigned to measure the CCT by OCT, Tomey pachymetry and ultrasound pachymetry. Paired <i>t</i>-test and Pearson correlation analysis was used for statistical analysis. <p>RESULTS: The mean CCT measured by OCT, Tomey pachymetry and ultrasound pachymetry was(475.15±33.67μm),(447.80±34.11μm),(465.18±34.23μm), respectively. Surgery reserved mean CCT was(431.22±35.32)μm. There were statistically differences between two comparative measured results(<i>P</i><0.05). Ultrasound pachymetry had a positive correlation with OCT and Tomey pachymetry(<i>P</i><0.01), and the correlation coefficient was 0.949 and 0.983, respectively. The actual CCT of 6mo post-operation was thicker than surgery reserved CCT.<p>CONCLUSION: The CCT measurements of three instruments were not interchangeable.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T08:06:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-97e1a7fa40c74e9b8935ae995035f41a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1672-5123
1672-5123
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T08:06:42Z
publishDate 2014-03-01
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
record_format Article
series Guoji Yanke Zazhi
spelling doaj.art-97e1a7fa40c74e9b8935ae995035f41a2022-12-22T00:31:57ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)Guoji Yanke Zazhi1672-51231672-51232014-03-0114347747910.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.03.26Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements after LASEK by three instrumentsXiao-Juan Peng0Ye Tian1Si-Ying Liu2Ji-Sheng Chen3Department of Ophthalmology, the People's Hospital of Xiangxi Autonomy State, Jishou 416000, Hunan Province, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, the People's Hospital of Xiangxi Autonomy State, Jishou 416000, Hunan Province, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, the People's Hospital of Xiangxi Autonomy State, Jishou 416000, Hunan Province, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, the People's Hospital of Xiangxi Autonomy State, Jishou 416000, Hunan Province, ChinaAIM: To compare the differences and the relationships of central corneal thickness(CCT)measurements among optical coherence tomography(OCT), Tomey pachymetry and ultrasound pachymetry after laser assisted subepithelial keratomileusis(LASEK). <p>METHODS:Forty-nine patients(96 eyes)with myopia after 6mo of LASEK were assigned to measure the CCT by OCT, Tomey pachymetry and ultrasound pachymetry. Paired <i>t</i>-test and Pearson correlation analysis was used for statistical analysis. <p>RESULTS: The mean CCT measured by OCT, Tomey pachymetry and ultrasound pachymetry was(475.15±33.67μm),(447.80±34.11μm),(465.18±34.23μm), respectively. Surgery reserved mean CCT was(431.22±35.32)μm. There were statistically differences between two comparative measured results(<i>P</i><0.05). Ultrasound pachymetry had a positive correlation with OCT and Tomey pachymetry(<i>P</i><0.01), and the correlation coefficient was 0.949 and 0.983, respectively. The actual CCT of 6mo post-operation was thicker than surgery reserved CCT.<p>CONCLUSION: The CCT measurements of three instruments were not interchangeable.http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2014/3/201403026.pdfoptical coherence tomographyTomey pachymetryultrasound pachymetrycentral corneal thicknesscentral corneal thickness
spellingShingle Xiao-Juan Peng
Ye Tian
Si-Ying Liu
Ji-Sheng Chen
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements after LASEK by three instruments
Guoji Yanke Zazhi
optical coherence tomography
Tomey pachymetry
ultrasound pachymetry
central corneal thickness
central corneal thickness
title Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements after LASEK by three instruments
title_full Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements after LASEK by three instruments
title_fullStr Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements after LASEK by three instruments
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements after LASEK by three instruments
title_short Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements after LASEK by three instruments
title_sort comparison of central corneal thickness measurements after lasek by three instruments
topic optical coherence tomography
Tomey pachymetry
ultrasound pachymetry
central corneal thickness
central corneal thickness
url http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2014/3/201403026.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaojuanpeng comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementsafterlasekbythreeinstruments
AT yetian comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementsafterlasekbythreeinstruments
AT siyingliu comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementsafterlasekbythreeinstruments
AT jishengchen comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementsafterlasekbythreeinstruments