CONVENTIONAL OR AUTOMATED PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION?

<p>During the past 15 years photogrammetric practice has experienced an unprecedented change by the influence of computer vision algorithms, which support an almost completely automated processing. It is widely acknowledged that this fact has “democratized” Photogrammetry a lot, in the sense t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Tapinaki, M. Pateraki, M. Skamantzari, A. Georgopoulos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2023-06-01
Series:The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Online Access:https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLVIII-M-2-2023/1535/2023/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-1535-2023.pdf
_version_ 1827916158109483008
author S. Tapinaki
M. Pateraki
M. Pateraki
M. Skamantzari
A. Georgopoulos
author_facet S. Tapinaki
M. Pateraki
M. Pateraki
M. Skamantzari
A. Georgopoulos
author_sort S. Tapinaki
collection DOAJ
description <p>During the past 15 years photogrammetric practice has experienced an unprecedented change by the influence of computer vision algorithms, which support an almost completely automated processing. It is widely acknowledged that this fact has “democratized” Photogrammetry a lot, in the sense that it has become almost everyone’s tool. However, this radical change has been met by scepticism by traditional photogrammetrists, who claim that such tools may lead to geometrically wrong and inaccurate results if not accompanied by thorough projection and error checks and evaluation of the correctness of results.</p><p>In this paper, the two approaches are briefly described on the basis of the geometric documentation of a cultural heritage funerary monument situated in the archaeological site of Messini in Southern Greece. An effort is made for highlighting the obvious advantages of each approach but also indicating their disadvantages. Applications, subject to different requirements and processing procedures are identified, rationalizing that conventional photogrammetric procedures still cannot be easily replaced.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:10:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-97e1ee8506ce4f90af237c5a1a073195
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1682-1750
2194-9034
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:10:01Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
spelling doaj.art-97e1ee8506ce4f90af237c5a1a0731952023-06-26T15:30:27ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences1682-17502194-90342023-06-01XLVIII-M-2-20231535154210.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-1535-2023CONVENTIONAL OR AUTOMATED PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION?S. Tapinaki0M. Pateraki1M. Pateraki2M. Skamantzari3A. Georgopoulos4Lab. of Photogrammetry, School of Rural, Surveying & Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, GreeceLab. of Photogrammetry, School of Rural, Surveying & Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, GreeceInstitute of Communication and Computer Systems, National Technical University of Athens, GreeceLab. of Photogrammetry, School of Rural, Surveying & Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, GreeceLab. of Photogrammetry, School of Rural, Surveying & Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Greece<p>During the past 15 years photogrammetric practice has experienced an unprecedented change by the influence of computer vision algorithms, which support an almost completely automated processing. It is widely acknowledged that this fact has “democratized” Photogrammetry a lot, in the sense that it has become almost everyone’s tool. However, this radical change has been met by scepticism by traditional photogrammetrists, who claim that such tools may lead to geometrically wrong and inaccurate results if not accompanied by thorough projection and error checks and evaluation of the correctness of results.</p><p>In this paper, the two approaches are briefly described on the basis of the geometric documentation of a cultural heritage funerary monument situated in the archaeological site of Messini in Southern Greece. An effort is made for highlighting the obvious advantages of each approach but also indicating their disadvantages. Applications, subject to different requirements and processing procedures are identified, rationalizing that conventional photogrammetric procedures still cannot be easily replaced.</p>https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLVIII-M-2-2023/1535/2023/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-1535-2023.pdf
spellingShingle S. Tapinaki
M. Pateraki
M. Pateraki
M. Skamantzari
A. Georgopoulos
CONVENTIONAL OR AUTOMATED PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION?
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
title CONVENTIONAL OR AUTOMATED PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION?
title_full CONVENTIONAL OR AUTOMATED PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION?
title_fullStr CONVENTIONAL OR AUTOMATED PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION?
title_full_unstemmed CONVENTIONAL OR AUTOMATED PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION?
title_short CONVENTIONAL OR AUTOMATED PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION?
title_sort conventional or automated photogrammetry for cultural heritage documentation
url https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLVIII-M-2-2023/1535/2023/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-1535-2023.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT stapinaki conventionalorautomatedphotogrammetryforculturalheritagedocumentation
AT mpateraki conventionalorautomatedphotogrammetryforculturalheritagedocumentation
AT mpateraki conventionalorautomatedphotogrammetryforculturalheritagedocumentation
AT mskamantzari conventionalorautomatedphotogrammetryforculturalheritagedocumentation
AT ageorgopoulos conventionalorautomatedphotogrammetryforculturalheritagedocumentation