A comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines

Abstract Wind power generation does not emit greenhouse gases or pollutants, but there are some carbon emissions from the manufacturing, transportation, operation, and waste disposal of wind turbines. Directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines currently have the large...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhi‐Yu Zhuo, Meng‐Jie Chen, Xiu‐Yu Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-03-01
Series:Energy Science & Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1425
_version_ 1797870741673213952
author Zhi‐Yu Zhuo
Meng‐Jie Chen
Xiu‐Yu Li
author_facet Zhi‐Yu Zhuo
Meng‐Jie Chen
Xiu‐Yu Li
author_sort Zhi‐Yu Zhuo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Wind power generation does not emit greenhouse gases or pollutants, but there are some carbon emissions from the manufacturing, transportation, operation, and waste disposal of wind turbines. Directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines currently have the largest market share in China, but few Chinese studies have compared their differences in carbon reduction potential. This paper uses life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantitatively analyze the full life cycle carbon emissions of the two wind turbines to determine which type of wind turbine has greater carbon reduction potential, obtaining the following results. (1) The full life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of 2.5 MW directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines are 8.48 and 10.43 g CO2/kWh, respectively. The direct‐driven permanent magnet wind turbine is superior in terms of carbon reduction. (2) The stage with the greatest impact and the greatest difference between the two wind turbines in the full life cycle is the production stage, during which the carbon emissions of the directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines are 1.045 × 106 and 1.210 × 106 kg, respectively. (3) According to sensitivity analysis, proper waste disposal and transportation can reduce carbon emissions from wind turbines. These research findings can be used to help achieve carbon peaking and neutrality goals, as well as the technological development of wind power enterprises.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T00:32:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-97ff49d33d9b4c1c8afcd8999f89849f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-0505
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T00:32:16Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Energy Science & Engineering
spelling doaj.art-97ff49d33d9b4c1c8afcd8999f89849f2023-03-14T20:10:40ZengWileyEnergy Science & Engineering2050-05052023-03-0111397898810.1002/ese3.1425A comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbinesZhi‐Yu Zhuo0Meng‐Jie Chen1Xiu‐Yu Li2School of New Energy North China Electric Power University Beijing ChinaSchool of New Energy North China Electric Power University Beijing ChinaSchool of New Energy North China Electric Power University Beijing ChinaAbstract Wind power generation does not emit greenhouse gases or pollutants, but there are some carbon emissions from the manufacturing, transportation, operation, and waste disposal of wind turbines. Directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines currently have the largest market share in China, but few Chinese studies have compared their differences in carbon reduction potential. This paper uses life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantitatively analyze the full life cycle carbon emissions of the two wind turbines to determine which type of wind turbine has greater carbon reduction potential, obtaining the following results. (1) The full life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of 2.5 MW directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines are 8.48 and 10.43 g CO2/kWh, respectively. The direct‐driven permanent magnet wind turbine is superior in terms of carbon reduction. (2) The stage with the greatest impact and the greatest difference between the two wind turbines in the full life cycle is the production stage, during which the carbon emissions of the directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines are 1.045 × 106 and 1.210 × 106 kg, respectively. (3) According to sensitivity analysis, proper waste disposal and transportation can reduce carbon emissions from wind turbines. These research findings can be used to help achieve carbon peaking and neutrality goals, as well as the technological development of wind power enterprises.https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1425carbon emissiondirectly driven permanent magnetdoubly fed asynchronouswind power generation
spellingShingle Zhi‐Yu Zhuo
Meng‐Jie Chen
Xiu‐Yu Li
A comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines
Energy Science & Engineering
carbon emission
directly driven permanent magnet
doubly fed asynchronous
wind power generation
title A comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines
title_full A comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines
title_short A comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines
title_sort comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines
topic carbon emission
directly driven permanent magnet
doubly fed asynchronous
wind power generation
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1425
work_keys_str_mv AT zhiyuzhuo acomparativeanalysisofcarbonreductionpotentialfordirectlydrivenpermanentmagnetanddoublyfedasynchronouswindturbines
AT mengjiechen acomparativeanalysisofcarbonreductionpotentialfordirectlydrivenpermanentmagnetanddoublyfedasynchronouswindturbines
AT xiuyuli acomparativeanalysisofcarbonreductionpotentialfordirectlydrivenpermanentmagnetanddoublyfedasynchronouswindturbines
AT zhiyuzhuo comparativeanalysisofcarbonreductionpotentialfordirectlydrivenpermanentmagnetanddoublyfedasynchronouswindturbines
AT mengjiechen comparativeanalysisofcarbonreductionpotentialfordirectlydrivenpermanentmagnetanddoublyfedasynchronouswindturbines
AT xiuyuli comparativeanalysisofcarbonreductionpotentialfordirectlydrivenpermanentmagnetanddoublyfedasynchronouswindturbines