A comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines
Abstract Wind power generation does not emit greenhouse gases or pollutants, but there are some carbon emissions from the manufacturing, transportation, operation, and waste disposal of wind turbines. Directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines currently have the large...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2023-03-01
|
Series: | Energy Science & Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1425 |
_version_ | 1797870741673213952 |
---|---|
author | Zhi‐Yu Zhuo Meng‐Jie Chen Xiu‐Yu Li |
author_facet | Zhi‐Yu Zhuo Meng‐Jie Chen Xiu‐Yu Li |
author_sort | Zhi‐Yu Zhuo |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Wind power generation does not emit greenhouse gases or pollutants, but there are some carbon emissions from the manufacturing, transportation, operation, and waste disposal of wind turbines. Directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines currently have the largest market share in China, but few Chinese studies have compared their differences in carbon reduction potential. This paper uses life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantitatively analyze the full life cycle carbon emissions of the two wind turbines to determine which type of wind turbine has greater carbon reduction potential, obtaining the following results. (1) The full life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of 2.5 MW directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines are 8.48 and 10.43 g CO2/kWh, respectively. The direct‐driven permanent magnet wind turbine is superior in terms of carbon reduction. (2) The stage with the greatest impact and the greatest difference between the two wind turbines in the full life cycle is the production stage, during which the carbon emissions of the directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines are 1.045 × 106 and 1.210 × 106 kg, respectively. (3) According to sensitivity analysis, proper waste disposal and transportation can reduce carbon emissions from wind turbines. These research findings can be used to help achieve carbon peaking and neutrality goals, as well as the technological development of wind power enterprises. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T00:32:16Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-97ff49d33d9b4c1c8afcd8999f89849f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2050-0505 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T00:32:16Z |
publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Energy Science & Engineering |
spelling | doaj.art-97ff49d33d9b4c1c8afcd8999f89849f2023-03-14T20:10:40ZengWileyEnergy Science & Engineering2050-05052023-03-0111397898810.1002/ese3.1425A comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbinesZhi‐Yu Zhuo0Meng‐Jie Chen1Xiu‐Yu Li2School of New Energy North China Electric Power University Beijing ChinaSchool of New Energy North China Electric Power University Beijing ChinaSchool of New Energy North China Electric Power University Beijing ChinaAbstract Wind power generation does not emit greenhouse gases or pollutants, but there are some carbon emissions from the manufacturing, transportation, operation, and waste disposal of wind turbines. Directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines currently have the largest market share in China, but few Chinese studies have compared their differences in carbon reduction potential. This paper uses life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantitatively analyze the full life cycle carbon emissions of the two wind turbines to determine which type of wind turbine has greater carbon reduction potential, obtaining the following results. (1) The full life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of 2.5 MW directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines are 8.48 and 10.43 g CO2/kWh, respectively. The direct‐driven permanent magnet wind turbine is superior in terms of carbon reduction. (2) The stage with the greatest impact and the greatest difference between the two wind turbines in the full life cycle is the production stage, during which the carbon emissions of the directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines are 1.045 × 106 and 1.210 × 106 kg, respectively. (3) According to sensitivity analysis, proper waste disposal and transportation can reduce carbon emissions from wind turbines. These research findings can be used to help achieve carbon peaking and neutrality goals, as well as the technological development of wind power enterprises.https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1425carbon emissiondirectly driven permanent magnetdoubly fed asynchronouswind power generation |
spellingShingle | Zhi‐Yu Zhuo Meng‐Jie Chen Xiu‐Yu Li A comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines Energy Science & Engineering carbon emission directly driven permanent magnet doubly fed asynchronous wind power generation |
title | A comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines |
title_full | A comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines |
title_fullStr | A comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines |
title_short | A comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines |
title_sort | comparative analysis of carbon reduction potential for directly driven permanent magnet and doubly fed asynchronous wind turbines |
topic | carbon emission directly driven permanent magnet doubly fed asynchronous wind power generation |
url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1425 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhiyuzhuo acomparativeanalysisofcarbonreductionpotentialfordirectlydrivenpermanentmagnetanddoublyfedasynchronouswindturbines AT mengjiechen acomparativeanalysisofcarbonreductionpotentialfordirectlydrivenpermanentmagnetanddoublyfedasynchronouswindturbines AT xiuyuli acomparativeanalysisofcarbonreductionpotentialfordirectlydrivenpermanentmagnetanddoublyfedasynchronouswindturbines AT zhiyuzhuo comparativeanalysisofcarbonreductionpotentialfordirectlydrivenpermanentmagnetanddoublyfedasynchronouswindturbines AT mengjiechen comparativeanalysisofcarbonreductionpotentialfordirectlydrivenpermanentmagnetanddoublyfedasynchronouswindturbines AT xiuyuli comparativeanalysisofcarbonreductionpotentialfordirectlydrivenpermanentmagnetanddoublyfedasynchronouswindturbines |