Paraumbilical hernia repair during cesarean delivery.

<b>Background and Objectives: </b> Pregnant women with paraumbilical hernia usually postpone hernia repair until after delivery, but some patients request that it be done during cesarean delivery. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of combined cesarean delivery and paraumbilical hernia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ghnnam Wagih, Helal Adel, Fawzy Muhammad, Ragab Ahmed, Shalaby Hend, Elrefaay Ehsan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2009-01-01
Series:Annals of Saudi Medicine
Online Access:http://www.saudiannals.net/article.asp?issn=0256-4947;year=2009;volume=29;issue=2;spage=115;epage=118;aulast=Ghnnam
_version_ 1819232195729948672
author Ghnnam Wagih
Helal Adel
Fawzy Muhammad
Ragab Ahmed
Shalaby Hend
Elrefaay Ehsan
author_facet Ghnnam Wagih
Helal Adel
Fawzy Muhammad
Ragab Ahmed
Shalaby Hend
Elrefaay Ehsan
author_sort Ghnnam Wagih
collection DOAJ
description <b>Background and Objectives: </b> Pregnant women with paraumbilical hernia usually postpone hernia repair until after delivery, but some patients request that it be done during cesarean delivery. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of combined cesarean delivery and paraumbilical hernia repair in a prospective study at a tertiary referral university hospital. <b> Patients and Methods: </b> In a prospective study, we compared the outcome of 48 patients undergoing cesarean delivery combined with paraumbilical hernia repair versus 100 low-risk patients undergoing cesarean delivery alone. The main outcome measures were operation time, blood loss, severity of pain, peripartum com--plications, , hospital stay, hernia recurrence, and patient satisfaction. <b> Results: </b> The combined procedure took significantly longer than cesarean delivery alone (75.2 minutes versus 60.5 minutes, P&#60; .001)). There were no major complications. Wound infection occurred in 6 patients (4.1&#x0025;). Hospital stay did not differ significantly from those of controls. Pain at the hernia site repair occurred in two pa--tients, and one hernia recurred in the hernia repair group during a mean follow-up period of 22 months (range, 6-36 months). All hernia patients reported that they preferred the combined operation. <b> Conclusions: </b> Combined cesarean delivery and paraumbilical hernia repair had the advantage of a single in--cision, single anesthesia, and a single hospital stay while avoiding re-hospitalization for a separate hernia repair. Our results indicate that the combination approach is safe, effective, and well accepted.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T11:57:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9802a2f9f4554975b5a0488081a37b7f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0256-4947
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T11:57:00Z
publishDate 2009-01-01
publisher King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
record_format Article
series Annals of Saudi Medicine
spelling doaj.art-9802a2f9f4554975b5a0488081a37b7f2022-12-21T17:48:03ZengKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research CentreAnnals of Saudi Medicine0256-49472009-01-01292115118Paraumbilical hernia repair during cesarean delivery.Ghnnam WagihHelal AdelFawzy MuhammadRagab AhmedShalaby HendElrefaay Ehsan<b>Background and Objectives: </b> Pregnant women with paraumbilical hernia usually postpone hernia repair until after delivery, but some patients request that it be done during cesarean delivery. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of combined cesarean delivery and paraumbilical hernia repair in a prospective study at a tertiary referral university hospital. <b> Patients and Methods: </b> In a prospective study, we compared the outcome of 48 patients undergoing cesarean delivery combined with paraumbilical hernia repair versus 100 low-risk patients undergoing cesarean delivery alone. The main outcome measures were operation time, blood loss, severity of pain, peripartum com--plications, , hospital stay, hernia recurrence, and patient satisfaction. <b> Results: </b> The combined procedure took significantly longer than cesarean delivery alone (75.2 minutes versus 60.5 minutes, P&#60; .001)). There were no major complications. Wound infection occurred in 6 patients (4.1&#x0025;). Hospital stay did not differ significantly from those of controls. Pain at the hernia site repair occurred in two pa--tients, and one hernia recurred in the hernia repair group during a mean follow-up period of 22 months (range, 6-36 months). All hernia patients reported that they preferred the combined operation. <b> Conclusions: </b> Combined cesarean delivery and paraumbilical hernia repair had the advantage of a single in--cision, single anesthesia, and a single hospital stay while avoiding re-hospitalization for a separate hernia repair. Our results indicate that the combination approach is safe, effective, and well accepted.http://www.saudiannals.net/article.asp?issn=0256-4947;year=2009;volume=29;issue=2;spage=115;epage=118;aulast=Ghnnam
spellingShingle Ghnnam Wagih
Helal Adel
Fawzy Muhammad
Ragab Ahmed
Shalaby Hend
Elrefaay Ehsan
Paraumbilical hernia repair during cesarean delivery.
Annals of Saudi Medicine
title Paraumbilical hernia repair during cesarean delivery.
title_full Paraumbilical hernia repair during cesarean delivery.
title_fullStr Paraumbilical hernia repair during cesarean delivery.
title_full_unstemmed Paraumbilical hernia repair during cesarean delivery.
title_short Paraumbilical hernia repair during cesarean delivery.
title_sort paraumbilical hernia repair during cesarean delivery
url http://www.saudiannals.net/article.asp?issn=0256-4947;year=2009;volume=29;issue=2;spage=115;epage=118;aulast=Ghnnam
work_keys_str_mv AT ghnnamwagih paraumbilicalherniarepairduringcesareandelivery
AT helaladel paraumbilicalherniarepairduringcesareandelivery
AT fawzymuhammad paraumbilicalherniarepairduringcesareandelivery
AT ragabahmed paraumbilicalherniarepairduringcesareandelivery
AT shalabyhend paraumbilicalherniarepairduringcesareandelivery
AT elrefaayehsan paraumbilicalherniarepairduringcesareandelivery