Comparative evaluation of “in-the-bag” intraocular lens implantation with cionni ring versus pars plana lensectomy–vitrectomy with anterior chamber IOL implantation in subluxated lenses in pediatric eyes

Background: Subluxation of the crystalline lens has various surgical management options. In moderate zonular dialysis, the capsular bag may be preserved and used for intraocular lens (IOL) implantation using a capsular tension ring or Cionni ring or Capsular tension segment. It is technically demand...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sweta Singh, Anju Rastogi, Jaidrath Kumar, Vartika Srivastava
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara 2022-10-01
Series:Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/45937
_version_ 1828195553455898624
author Sweta Singh
Anju Rastogi
Jaidrath Kumar
Vartika Srivastava
author_facet Sweta Singh
Anju Rastogi
Jaidrath Kumar
Vartika Srivastava
author_sort Sweta Singh
collection DOAJ
description Background: Subluxation of the crystalline lens has various surgical management options. In moderate zonular dialysis, the capsular bag may be preserved and used for intraocular lens (IOL) implantation using a capsular tension ring or Cionni ring or Capsular tension segment. It is technically demanding and associated with high incidence of complications such as IOL decentration, dislocation, and posterior capsular opacification (PCO). Advantages of the combined pars plana lensectomy–vitrectomy (PPL/PPV) with anterior chamber IOL (ACIOL) approach include a closed ocular surgical system, minimal corneal trauma, limited iris trauma, and good vitreous control. Therefore, in this study, we aim to study the outcomes of inthe-bag IOL implantation with Cionni ring versus PPL/PPV with ACIOL in subluxated lenses in children. Aims and Objectives: The aims of this study were to compare “in-the-bag” IOL implantation with Cionni ring versus PPL/PPV with ACIOL implantation in subluxated lenses in children. Materials and Methods: In this prospective, comparative, and interventional case series, 20 eyes (18 children, 8–18 years) with 90–210° subluxation were randomly allocated into two groups (ten eyes each). Group A underwent single eyelet Cionni Ring with in-the-bag PCIOL implantation and Group B underwent PPL/PPV with ACIOL. Outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell count (ECC), intraocular pressure, fundus evaluation, and intraoperative/post-operative complications. Results: The etiology of subluxation included trauma (40%), Marfan’s syndrome (20%), myopia (20%), and others (20%). In Group A, intraoperative difficulties were encountered in capsulorrhexis, irrigationaspiration, and increased duration of surgery. Two eyes in Group B had intraoperative lens fragment drop in vitreous. At 3 months, no statistically significant difference in BCVA was noted. About 90% eyes in Group A and 80% eyes in Group B had final BCVA of ≥6/18. ECC and PCO were significantly higher in Group A at 3 months. Conclusion: Implantation of planned open-loop ACIOL is viable surgical alternative to Cionni ring with PCIOL implantation in large lens subluxation and good pre-operative ECC.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T09:44:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-98040c46660747edb338f050bd025445
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2467-9100
2091-0576
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T09:44:31Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara
record_format Article
series Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-98040c46660747edb338f050bd0254452022-12-22T03:37:59ZengManipal College of Medical Sciences, PokharaAsian Journal of Medical Sciences2467-91002091-05762022-10-011310210215https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v13i10.45937Comparative evaluation of “in-the-bag” intraocular lens implantation with cionni ring versus pars plana lensectomy–vitrectomy with anterior chamber IOL implantation in subluxated lenses in pediatric eyesSweta Singh 0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8507-7722Anju Rastogi 1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0937-0601Jaidrath Kumar 2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8616-0317Vartika Srivastava 3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8476-8049Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, AL-Falah School of Medical Science and Research Center, Faridabad, Haryana, India Director Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Guru Nanak Eye Center, New Delhi, India Senior Consultant, Department of Ophthalmology, Sarvodaya Hospital and Research Center, Faridabad, Haryana, India Senior Optometrist, Sarvodaya Hospital and Research Center, Faridabad, Haryana, India Background: Subluxation of the crystalline lens has various surgical management options. In moderate zonular dialysis, the capsular bag may be preserved and used for intraocular lens (IOL) implantation using a capsular tension ring or Cionni ring or Capsular tension segment. It is technically demanding and associated with high incidence of complications such as IOL decentration, dislocation, and posterior capsular opacification (PCO). Advantages of the combined pars plana lensectomy–vitrectomy (PPL/PPV) with anterior chamber IOL (ACIOL) approach include a closed ocular surgical system, minimal corneal trauma, limited iris trauma, and good vitreous control. Therefore, in this study, we aim to study the outcomes of inthe-bag IOL implantation with Cionni ring versus PPL/PPV with ACIOL in subluxated lenses in children. Aims and Objectives: The aims of this study were to compare “in-the-bag” IOL implantation with Cionni ring versus PPL/PPV with ACIOL implantation in subluxated lenses in children. Materials and Methods: In this prospective, comparative, and interventional case series, 20 eyes (18 children, 8–18 years) with 90–210° subluxation were randomly allocated into two groups (ten eyes each). Group A underwent single eyelet Cionni Ring with in-the-bag PCIOL implantation and Group B underwent PPL/PPV with ACIOL. Outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell count (ECC), intraocular pressure, fundus evaluation, and intraoperative/post-operative complications. Results: The etiology of subluxation included trauma (40%), Marfan’s syndrome (20%), myopia (20%), and others (20%). In Group A, intraoperative difficulties were encountered in capsulorrhexis, irrigationaspiration, and increased duration of surgery. Two eyes in Group B had intraoperative lens fragment drop in vitreous. At 3 months, no statistically significant difference in BCVA was noted. About 90% eyes in Group A and 80% eyes in Group B had final BCVA of ≥6/18. ECC and PCO were significantly higher in Group A at 3 months. Conclusion: Implantation of planned open-loop ACIOL is viable surgical alternative to Cionni ring with PCIOL implantation in large lens subluxation and good pre-operative ECC.https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/45937anterior chamber intraocular lens; cionni ring; pars plana lensectomy; subluxation
spellingShingle Sweta Singh
Anju Rastogi
Jaidrath Kumar
Vartika Srivastava
Comparative evaluation of “in-the-bag” intraocular lens implantation with cionni ring versus pars plana lensectomy–vitrectomy with anterior chamber IOL implantation in subluxated lenses in pediatric eyes
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
anterior chamber intraocular lens; cionni ring; pars plana lensectomy; subluxation
title Comparative evaluation of “in-the-bag” intraocular lens implantation with cionni ring versus pars plana lensectomy–vitrectomy with anterior chamber IOL implantation in subluxated lenses in pediatric eyes
title_full Comparative evaluation of “in-the-bag” intraocular lens implantation with cionni ring versus pars plana lensectomy–vitrectomy with anterior chamber IOL implantation in subluxated lenses in pediatric eyes
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of “in-the-bag” intraocular lens implantation with cionni ring versus pars plana lensectomy–vitrectomy with anterior chamber IOL implantation in subluxated lenses in pediatric eyes
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of “in-the-bag” intraocular lens implantation with cionni ring versus pars plana lensectomy–vitrectomy with anterior chamber IOL implantation in subluxated lenses in pediatric eyes
title_short Comparative evaluation of “in-the-bag” intraocular lens implantation with cionni ring versus pars plana lensectomy–vitrectomy with anterior chamber IOL implantation in subluxated lenses in pediatric eyes
title_sort comparative evaluation of in the bag intraocular lens implantation with cionni ring versus pars plana lensectomy vitrectomy with anterior chamber iol implantation in subluxated lenses in pediatric eyes
topic anterior chamber intraocular lens; cionni ring; pars plana lensectomy; subluxation
url https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/45937
work_keys_str_mv AT swetasingh comparativeevaluationofinthebagintraocularlensimplantationwithcionniringversusparsplanalensectomyvitrectomywithanteriorchamberiolimplantationinsubluxatedlensesinpediatriceyes
AT anjurastogi comparativeevaluationofinthebagintraocularlensimplantationwithcionniringversusparsplanalensectomyvitrectomywithanteriorchamberiolimplantationinsubluxatedlensesinpediatriceyes
AT jaidrathkumar comparativeevaluationofinthebagintraocularlensimplantationwithcionniringversusparsplanalensectomyvitrectomywithanteriorchamberiolimplantationinsubluxatedlensesinpediatriceyes
AT vartikasrivastava comparativeevaluationofinthebagintraocularlensimplantationwithcionniringversusparsplanalensectomyvitrectomywithanteriorchamberiolimplantationinsubluxatedlensesinpediatriceyes