Crisis Transmission: Global Financial Crisis

The aim of this paper is to explore, empirically, the channels of crisis transmission with regard to the Global financial crisis. EMP-based crisis proxy is used for eight countries, which include Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Mexico and Russia. The period considered for estimat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdullah Alam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Risk Analysis - China 2012-11-01
Series:Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response (JRACR)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/3939.pdf
_version_ 1818533784783421440
author Abdullah Alam
author_facet Abdullah Alam
author_sort Abdullah Alam
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this paper is to explore, empirically, the channels of crisis transmission with regard to the Global financial crisis. EMP-based crisis proxy is used for eight countries, which include Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Mexico and Russia. The period considered for estimation was Q1 2001 – Q2 2010. Based on the Vector AutoRegression (VAR) and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) specification, it is concluded that the competitive devaluation effect did not play significant role in the transmission of the crisis. Wake-up call and Cashin effects were the major contributing transmission channels for Global financial crisis. Indonesia, Japan and Russia showed signs of wake-up call effect, whereas Brazil and Japan recorded cash-in effect.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T18:03:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-981338d0fcde497482baddeed11b18b8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2210-8505
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T18:03:19Z
publishDate 2012-11-01
publisher Society for Risk Analysis - China
record_format Article
series Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response (JRACR)
spelling doaj.art-981338d0fcde497482baddeed11b18b82022-12-22T00:55:50ZengSociety for Risk Analysis - ChinaJournal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response (JRACR)2210-85052012-11-012310.2991/jrarc.2012.2.3.1Crisis Transmission: Global Financial CrisisAbdullah AlamThe aim of this paper is to explore, empirically, the channels of crisis transmission with regard to the Global financial crisis. EMP-based crisis proxy is used for eight countries, which include Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Mexico and Russia. The period considered for estimation was Q1 2001 – Q2 2010. Based on the Vector AutoRegression (VAR) and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) specification, it is concluded that the competitive devaluation effect did not play significant role in the transmission of the crisis. Wake-up call and Cashin effects were the major contributing transmission channels for Global financial crisis. Indonesia, Japan and Russia showed signs of wake-up call effect, whereas Brazil and Japan recorded cash-in effect.https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/3939.pdfCrisis TransmissionGlobal Financial CrisisCompetitive Devaluation EffectWake-up Call EffectCash-in EffectMarket Integration
spellingShingle Abdullah Alam
Crisis Transmission: Global Financial Crisis
Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response (JRACR)
Crisis Transmission
Global Financial Crisis
Competitive Devaluation Effect
Wake-up Call Effect
Cash-in Effect
Market Integration
title Crisis Transmission: Global Financial Crisis
title_full Crisis Transmission: Global Financial Crisis
title_fullStr Crisis Transmission: Global Financial Crisis
title_full_unstemmed Crisis Transmission: Global Financial Crisis
title_short Crisis Transmission: Global Financial Crisis
title_sort crisis transmission global financial crisis
topic Crisis Transmission
Global Financial Crisis
Competitive Devaluation Effect
Wake-up Call Effect
Cash-in Effect
Market Integration
url https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/3939.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT abdullahalam crisistransmissionglobalfinancialcrisis