Investigation of the effect of a solar collector, nozzle, and water cooling on solar still double slope
Many nations, particularly those in rural places, are struggling with the freshwater crisis. Recently the best way to produce freshwater is done with solar still. In this study, four different solar stills were built and were labelled as conventional solar still (SSA), solar still with the addition...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2022-12-01
|
Series: | Case Studies in Thermal Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X22007262 |
_version_ | 1811185546983112704 |
---|---|
author | Y.P. Sibagariang F.H. Napitupulu H. Kawai H. Ambarita |
author_facet | Y.P. Sibagariang F.H. Napitupulu H. Kawai H. Ambarita |
author_sort | Y.P. Sibagariang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Many nations, particularly those in rural places, are struggling with the freshwater crisis. Recently the best way to produce freshwater is done with solar still. In this study, four different solar stills were built and were labelled as conventional solar still (SSA), solar still with the addition of water cooling on the glass cover (SSB), solar still with the addition of a nozzle inside the solar still (SSC), and solar still with the addition of a solar collector (SSD). The four solar stills will be evaluated and compared under the same environmental conditions in Medan City, Indonesia (Latitude/Longitude/: 3° 47' 3.4908'' N/98° 41' 39.1956'' E). The temperature, freshwater productivity, exergy, energy, and economic analysis will be studied for the four solar stills. From the data, the glass temperature of SSC was higher than SSA in the range 08.00 -11.30. SSD was found to have the highest average energy and exergy efficiency. SSB has successfully increased freshwater production by 28.9% from 0.81 L/m2/day to 1.0436 L/m2/day. Moreover, SSB has the lowest cost compared to other solar stills, which only cost 0.193 $/L/m2. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T13:31:17Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-98177679c2d4464aafc7fbee382004ff |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2214-157X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T13:31:17Z |
publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Case Studies in Thermal Engineering |
spelling | doaj.art-98177679c2d4464aafc7fbee382004ff2022-12-22T04:21:49ZengElsevierCase Studies in Thermal Engineering2214-157X2022-12-0140102489Investigation of the effect of a solar collector, nozzle, and water cooling on solar still double slopeY.P. Sibagariang0F.H. Napitupulu1H. Kawai2H. Ambarita3Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 20155, IndonesiaMechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 20155, IndonesiaMechanical Engineering, Muroran Institute of Technology, 27-1 Mizumoto-cho, Muroran, 050-8585, JapanMechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 20155, Indonesia; Corresponding author.Many nations, particularly those in rural places, are struggling with the freshwater crisis. Recently the best way to produce freshwater is done with solar still. In this study, four different solar stills were built and were labelled as conventional solar still (SSA), solar still with the addition of water cooling on the glass cover (SSB), solar still with the addition of a nozzle inside the solar still (SSC), and solar still with the addition of a solar collector (SSD). The four solar stills will be evaluated and compared under the same environmental conditions in Medan City, Indonesia (Latitude/Longitude/: 3° 47' 3.4908'' N/98° 41' 39.1956'' E). The temperature, freshwater productivity, exergy, energy, and economic analysis will be studied for the four solar stills. From the data, the glass temperature of SSC was higher than SSA in the range 08.00 -11.30. SSD was found to have the highest average energy and exergy efficiency. SSB has successfully increased freshwater production by 28.9% from 0.81 L/m2/day to 1.0436 L/m2/day. Moreover, SSB has the lowest cost compared to other solar stills, which only cost 0.193 $/L/m2.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X22007262Solar stillDouble slopeSolar collectorNozzleWater cooling |
spellingShingle | Y.P. Sibagariang F.H. Napitupulu H. Kawai H. Ambarita Investigation of the effect of a solar collector, nozzle, and water cooling on solar still double slope Case Studies in Thermal Engineering Solar still Double slope Solar collector Nozzle Water cooling |
title | Investigation of the effect of a solar collector, nozzle, and water cooling on solar still double slope |
title_full | Investigation of the effect of a solar collector, nozzle, and water cooling on solar still double slope |
title_fullStr | Investigation of the effect of a solar collector, nozzle, and water cooling on solar still double slope |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigation of the effect of a solar collector, nozzle, and water cooling on solar still double slope |
title_short | Investigation of the effect of a solar collector, nozzle, and water cooling on solar still double slope |
title_sort | investigation of the effect of a solar collector nozzle and water cooling on solar still double slope |
topic | Solar still Double slope Solar collector Nozzle Water cooling |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X22007262 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ypsibagariang investigationoftheeffectofasolarcollectornozzleandwatercoolingonsolarstilldoubleslope AT fhnapitupulu investigationoftheeffectofasolarcollectornozzleandwatercoolingonsolarstilldoubleslope AT hkawai investigationoftheeffectofasolarcollectornozzleandwatercoolingonsolarstilldoubleslope AT hambarita investigationoftheeffectofasolarcollectornozzleandwatercoolingonsolarstilldoubleslope |