Investigation of the effect of a solar collector, nozzle, and water cooling on solar still double slope

Many nations, particularly those in rural places, are struggling with the freshwater crisis. Recently the best way to produce freshwater is done with solar still. In this study, four different solar stills were built and were labelled as conventional solar still (SSA), solar still with the addition...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Y.P. Sibagariang, F.H. Napitupulu, H. Kawai, H. Ambarita
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-12-01
Series:Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X22007262
_version_ 1811185546983112704
author Y.P. Sibagariang
F.H. Napitupulu
H. Kawai
H. Ambarita
author_facet Y.P. Sibagariang
F.H. Napitupulu
H. Kawai
H. Ambarita
author_sort Y.P. Sibagariang
collection DOAJ
description Many nations, particularly those in rural places, are struggling with the freshwater crisis. Recently the best way to produce freshwater is done with solar still. In this study, four different solar stills were built and were labelled as conventional solar still (SSA), solar still with the addition of water cooling on the glass cover (SSB), solar still with the addition of a nozzle inside the solar still (SSC), and solar still with the addition of a solar collector (SSD). The four solar stills will be evaluated and compared under the same environmental conditions in Medan City, Indonesia (Latitude/Longitude/: 3° 47' 3.4908'' N/98° 41' 39.1956'' E). The temperature, freshwater productivity, exergy, energy, and economic analysis will be studied for the four solar stills. From the data, the glass temperature of SSC was higher than SSA in the range 08.00 -11.30. SSD was found to have the highest average energy and exergy efficiency. SSB has successfully increased freshwater production by 28.9% from 0.81 L/m2/day to 1.0436 L/m2/day. Moreover, SSB has the lowest cost compared to other solar stills, which only cost 0.193 $/L/m2.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T13:31:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-98177679c2d4464aafc7fbee382004ff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2214-157X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T13:31:17Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
spelling doaj.art-98177679c2d4464aafc7fbee382004ff2022-12-22T04:21:49ZengElsevierCase Studies in Thermal Engineering2214-157X2022-12-0140102489Investigation of the effect of a solar collector, nozzle, and water cooling on solar still double slopeY.P. Sibagariang0F.H. Napitupulu1H. Kawai2H. Ambarita3Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 20155, IndonesiaMechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 20155, IndonesiaMechanical Engineering, Muroran Institute of Technology, 27-1 Mizumoto-cho, Muroran, 050-8585, JapanMechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 20155, Indonesia; Corresponding author.Many nations, particularly those in rural places, are struggling with the freshwater crisis. Recently the best way to produce freshwater is done with solar still. In this study, four different solar stills were built and were labelled as conventional solar still (SSA), solar still with the addition of water cooling on the glass cover (SSB), solar still with the addition of a nozzle inside the solar still (SSC), and solar still with the addition of a solar collector (SSD). The four solar stills will be evaluated and compared under the same environmental conditions in Medan City, Indonesia (Latitude/Longitude/: 3° 47' 3.4908'' N/98° 41' 39.1956'' E). The temperature, freshwater productivity, exergy, energy, and economic analysis will be studied for the four solar stills. From the data, the glass temperature of SSC was higher than SSA in the range 08.00 -11.30. SSD was found to have the highest average energy and exergy efficiency. SSB has successfully increased freshwater production by 28.9% from 0.81 L/m2/day to 1.0436 L/m2/day. Moreover, SSB has the lowest cost compared to other solar stills, which only cost 0.193 $/L/m2.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X22007262Solar stillDouble slopeSolar collectorNozzleWater cooling
spellingShingle Y.P. Sibagariang
F.H. Napitupulu
H. Kawai
H. Ambarita
Investigation of the effect of a solar collector, nozzle, and water cooling on solar still double slope
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Solar still
Double slope
Solar collector
Nozzle
Water cooling
title Investigation of the effect of a solar collector, nozzle, and water cooling on solar still double slope
title_full Investigation of the effect of a solar collector, nozzle, and water cooling on solar still double slope
title_fullStr Investigation of the effect of a solar collector, nozzle, and water cooling on solar still double slope
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of the effect of a solar collector, nozzle, and water cooling on solar still double slope
title_short Investigation of the effect of a solar collector, nozzle, and water cooling on solar still double slope
title_sort investigation of the effect of a solar collector nozzle and water cooling on solar still double slope
topic Solar still
Double slope
Solar collector
Nozzle
Water cooling
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X22007262
work_keys_str_mv AT ypsibagariang investigationoftheeffectofasolarcollectornozzleandwatercoolingonsolarstilldoubleslope
AT fhnapitupulu investigationoftheeffectofasolarcollectornozzleandwatercoolingonsolarstilldoubleslope
AT hkawai investigationoftheeffectofasolarcollectornozzleandwatercoolingonsolarstilldoubleslope
AT hambarita investigationoftheeffectofasolarcollectornozzleandwatercoolingonsolarstilldoubleslope