The humanistic study of religions: An obscure tradition illuminated by the ‘Knights of Labor’

Today ‘humanistic’ and ‘humanities’ are terms rarely used in discussions on methodology and epistemology within the study/history of religions. This article laments this state of affair and reminds the readers of same basic advantages of a humanistic study of religions in comparison to chiefly socia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stefan Arvidsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Society for the Study of Religion 2015-12-01
Series:Temenos
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.fi/temenos/article/view/53569
_version_ 1818857427501580288
author Stefan Arvidsson
author_facet Stefan Arvidsson
author_sort Stefan Arvidsson
collection DOAJ
description Today ‘humanistic’ and ‘humanities’ are terms rarely used in discussions on methodology and epistemology within the study/history of religions. This article laments this state of affair and reminds the readers of same basic advantages of a humanistic study of religions in comparison to chiefly social scientific approaches to religion and culture. After an initial philosophical argument on the implications of ‘humanistic’, the article touches upon the significance of historical failures, utopianism, empathy and ‘the orectic’. These discussions take place against an analysis of the mythology and ritual life of the 19th century, American, socialist order The Knight of Labor.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T08:40:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9821df6c63fb41f1808263bef3ad8f46
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2342-7256
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T08:40:13Z
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher Finnish Society for the Study of Religion
record_format Article
series Temenos
spelling doaj.art-9821df6c63fb41f1808263bef3ad8f462022-12-21T20:28:57ZengFinnish Society for the Study of ReligionTemenos2342-72562015-12-0151210.33356/temenos.53569The humanistic study of religions: An obscure tradition illuminated by the ‘Knights of Labor’Stefan ArvidssonToday ‘humanistic’ and ‘humanities’ are terms rarely used in discussions on methodology and epistemology within the study/history of religions. This article laments this state of affair and reminds the readers of same basic advantages of a humanistic study of religions in comparison to chiefly social scientific approaches to religion and culture. After an initial philosophical argument on the implications of ‘humanistic’, the article touches upon the significance of historical failures, utopianism, empathy and ‘the orectic’. These discussions take place against an analysis of the mythology and ritual life of the 19th century, American, socialist order The Knight of Labor.https://journal.fi/temenos/article/view/53569humanistichumanitiesmethodologyepistemology
spellingShingle Stefan Arvidsson
The humanistic study of religions: An obscure tradition illuminated by the ‘Knights of Labor’
Temenos
humanistic
humanities
methodology
epistemology
title The humanistic study of religions: An obscure tradition illuminated by the ‘Knights of Labor’
title_full The humanistic study of religions: An obscure tradition illuminated by the ‘Knights of Labor’
title_fullStr The humanistic study of religions: An obscure tradition illuminated by the ‘Knights of Labor’
title_full_unstemmed The humanistic study of religions: An obscure tradition illuminated by the ‘Knights of Labor’
title_short The humanistic study of religions: An obscure tradition illuminated by the ‘Knights of Labor’
title_sort humanistic study of religions an obscure tradition illuminated by the knights of labor
topic humanistic
humanities
methodology
epistemology
url https://journal.fi/temenos/article/view/53569
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanarvidsson thehumanisticstudyofreligionsanobscuretraditionilluminatedbytheknightsoflabor
AT stefanarvidsson humanisticstudyofreligionsanobscuretraditionilluminatedbytheknightsoflabor