Effects of multidisciplinary rehabilitation on chronic fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Several rehabilitation programmes aim at reducing the impact of fatigue in MS patients. Acute and chronic fatigue should require different management. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of individually tailored, multidisciplinary outpatient rehabilitation (MDR) on chronic fatigue. METHODS...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marc B Rietberg, Erwin E H van Wegen, Isaline C J M Eyssen, Gert Kwakkel, MS study group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4169408?pdf=render
_version_ 1818700078669365248
author Marc B Rietberg
Erwin E H van Wegen
Isaline C J M Eyssen
Gert Kwakkel
MS study group
author_facet Marc B Rietberg
Erwin E H van Wegen
Isaline C J M Eyssen
Gert Kwakkel
MS study group
author_sort Marc B Rietberg
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND: Several rehabilitation programmes aim at reducing the impact of fatigue in MS patients. Acute and chronic fatigue should require different management. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of individually tailored, multidisciplinary outpatient rehabilitation (MDR) on chronic fatigue. METHODS: Forty-eight ambulatory MS patients with chronic fatigue were randomized to MDR or to MS-nurse consultation. Fatigue was assessed by the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R). Secondary outcomes included the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale, Functional Independence Measure, Disability and Impact Profile (DIP), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale and the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). RESULTS: The primary outcome measure CIS-20R overall score showed no significant differences between groups at 12 weeks (P = 0.39) and 24 weeks follow-up (P = 0.14), nor for subscales (t = 12 and t = 24, 0.19≤P≤0.88). No significant within-group effects were found for both groups with respect to the primary (0.57≤p≤0.97) and secondary (0.11≤p≤0.92) outcome measures from baseline to 12 or 24 weeks. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary rehabilitation was not more effective in terms of reducing self-reported fatigue in MS patients compared to MS-nurse consultation. Our results suggest that chronic fatigue in patients with MS may be highly invariant over time, irrespective of interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: controlled-trials.com ISRCTN05017507.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T14:59:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9832e1a009864fdb9368d328c1cdbf69
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T14:59:14Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-9832e1a009864fdb9368d328c1cdbf692022-12-21T21:43:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0199e10771010.1371/journal.pone.0107710Effects of multidisciplinary rehabilitation on chronic fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.Marc B RietbergErwin E H van WegenIsaline C J M EyssenGert KwakkelMS study groupBACKGROUND: Several rehabilitation programmes aim at reducing the impact of fatigue in MS patients. Acute and chronic fatigue should require different management. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of individually tailored, multidisciplinary outpatient rehabilitation (MDR) on chronic fatigue. METHODS: Forty-eight ambulatory MS patients with chronic fatigue were randomized to MDR or to MS-nurse consultation. Fatigue was assessed by the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R). Secondary outcomes included the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale, Functional Independence Measure, Disability and Impact Profile (DIP), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale and the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). RESULTS: The primary outcome measure CIS-20R overall score showed no significant differences between groups at 12 weeks (P = 0.39) and 24 weeks follow-up (P = 0.14), nor for subscales (t = 12 and t = 24, 0.19≤P≤0.88). No significant within-group effects were found for both groups with respect to the primary (0.57≤p≤0.97) and secondary (0.11≤p≤0.92) outcome measures from baseline to 12 or 24 weeks. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary rehabilitation was not more effective in terms of reducing self-reported fatigue in MS patients compared to MS-nurse consultation. Our results suggest that chronic fatigue in patients with MS may be highly invariant over time, irrespective of interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: controlled-trials.com ISRCTN05017507.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4169408?pdf=render
spellingShingle Marc B Rietberg
Erwin E H van Wegen
Isaline C J M Eyssen
Gert Kwakkel
MS study group
Effects of multidisciplinary rehabilitation on chronic fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
PLoS ONE
title Effects of multidisciplinary rehabilitation on chronic fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
title_full Effects of multidisciplinary rehabilitation on chronic fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
title_fullStr Effects of multidisciplinary rehabilitation on chronic fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of multidisciplinary rehabilitation on chronic fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
title_short Effects of multidisciplinary rehabilitation on chronic fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
title_sort effects of multidisciplinary rehabilitation on chronic fatigue in multiple sclerosis a randomized controlled trial
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4169408?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT marcbrietberg effectsofmultidisciplinaryrehabilitationonchronicfatigueinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT erwinehvanwegen effectsofmultidisciplinaryrehabilitationonchronicfatigueinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT isalinecjmeyssen effectsofmultidisciplinaryrehabilitationonchronicfatigueinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gertkwakkel effectsofmultidisciplinaryrehabilitationonchronicfatigueinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT msstudygroup effectsofmultidisciplinaryrehabilitationonchronicfatigueinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial