Validity and reliability of a novel iPhone method to rapidly measure cervical sagittal parameters

Abstract We introduced a novel method based on the iPhone’s intrinsic photo edit function to measure sagittal parameters of the cervical spine. This study aimed to assess the validity of this new method compared with the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) method (the gold standard) an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jie Zhang, Chunyang Zhang, Weiyang Zhong, Zenghui Zhao, Fei Han, Zhenghan Han, Hang Zhang, Tianji Huang, Xiaoji Luo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-11-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21660-z
_version_ 1798016908390301696
author Jie Zhang
Chunyang Zhang
Weiyang Zhong
Zenghui Zhao
Fei Han
Zhenghan Han
Hang Zhang
Tianji Huang
Xiaoji Luo
author_facet Jie Zhang
Chunyang Zhang
Weiyang Zhong
Zenghui Zhao
Fei Han
Zhenghan Han
Hang Zhang
Tianji Huang
Xiaoji Luo
author_sort Jie Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We introduced a novel method based on the iPhone’s intrinsic photo edit function to measure sagittal parameters of the cervical spine. This study aimed to assess the validity of this new method compared with the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) method (the gold standard) and to test the reliability of this novel technique. One hundred consecutive patients admitted to our hospital diagnosed with cervical spondylotic myelopathy or cervical spondylotic radiculopathy were retrospectively reviewed. Four angles, including the C0-2 Cobb angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, T1S and neck tilt (NT), were assessed by iPhone and PACS. The validity and reliability were evaluated, and the time taken by both methods was compared. The ICCs of the validity of the C0-2 Cobb angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, T1S and NT were 0.960, 0.976, 0.980 and 0.946, respectively. The ICCs of the intraobserver reliability of the C0-2 Cobb angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, T1S and NT were 0.966, 0.983, 0.971 and 0.951, respectively. The ICCs of the interobserver reliability of the C0-2 Cobb angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, T1S and NT were 0.953, 0.972, 0.957 and 0.929, respectively. The Bland‒Altman plot of validity of the four angles revealed mean differences of 0.3, 0.2, 0.1, and 0.1 degrees with 95% CIs of 4.1, 4.1, 2.9, and 4.3 degrees, respectively. The iPhone measurement time (58.55 ± 4.17 s) was significantly less than that by the PACS (70.40 ± 2.92 s) when compared by the independent-samples T test (P < 0.001). This novel method using the iPhone’s intrinsic photo edit function is accurate, reliable, fast and convenient when measuring cervical sagittal parameters.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T15:57:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-98339bf1bb5c457886fed6878f7ee4be
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T15:57:00Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-98339bf1bb5c457886fed6878f7ee4be2022-12-22T04:15:07ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-11-011211810.1038/s41598-022-21660-zValidity and reliability of a novel iPhone method to rapidly measure cervical sagittal parametersJie Zhang0Chunyang Zhang1Weiyang Zhong2Zenghui Zhao3Fei Han4Zhenghan Han5Hang Zhang6Tianji Huang7Xiaoji Luo8Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, People’s Hospital of Chongqing Banan DistrictDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityAbstract We introduced a novel method based on the iPhone’s intrinsic photo edit function to measure sagittal parameters of the cervical spine. This study aimed to assess the validity of this new method compared with the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) method (the gold standard) and to test the reliability of this novel technique. One hundred consecutive patients admitted to our hospital diagnosed with cervical spondylotic myelopathy or cervical spondylotic radiculopathy were retrospectively reviewed. Four angles, including the C0-2 Cobb angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, T1S and neck tilt (NT), were assessed by iPhone and PACS. The validity and reliability were evaluated, and the time taken by both methods was compared. The ICCs of the validity of the C0-2 Cobb angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, T1S and NT were 0.960, 0.976, 0.980 and 0.946, respectively. The ICCs of the intraobserver reliability of the C0-2 Cobb angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, T1S and NT were 0.966, 0.983, 0.971 and 0.951, respectively. The ICCs of the interobserver reliability of the C0-2 Cobb angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, T1S and NT were 0.953, 0.972, 0.957 and 0.929, respectively. The Bland‒Altman plot of validity of the four angles revealed mean differences of 0.3, 0.2, 0.1, and 0.1 degrees with 95% CIs of 4.1, 4.1, 2.9, and 4.3 degrees, respectively. The iPhone measurement time (58.55 ± 4.17 s) was significantly less than that by the PACS (70.40 ± 2.92 s) when compared by the independent-samples T test (P < 0.001). This novel method using the iPhone’s intrinsic photo edit function is accurate, reliable, fast and convenient when measuring cervical sagittal parameters.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21660-z
spellingShingle Jie Zhang
Chunyang Zhang
Weiyang Zhong
Zenghui Zhao
Fei Han
Zhenghan Han
Hang Zhang
Tianji Huang
Xiaoji Luo
Validity and reliability of a novel iPhone method to rapidly measure cervical sagittal parameters
Scientific Reports
title Validity and reliability of a novel iPhone method to rapidly measure cervical sagittal parameters
title_full Validity and reliability of a novel iPhone method to rapidly measure cervical sagittal parameters
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of a novel iPhone method to rapidly measure cervical sagittal parameters
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of a novel iPhone method to rapidly measure cervical sagittal parameters
title_short Validity and reliability of a novel iPhone method to rapidly measure cervical sagittal parameters
title_sort validity and reliability of a novel iphone method to rapidly measure cervical sagittal parameters
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21660-z
work_keys_str_mv AT jiezhang validityandreliabilityofanoveliphonemethodtorapidlymeasurecervicalsagittalparameters
AT chunyangzhang validityandreliabilityofanoveliphonemethodtorapidlymeasurecervicalsagittalparameters
AT weiyangzhong validityandreliabilityofanoveliphonemethodtorapidlymeasurecervicalsagittalparameters
AT zenghuizhao validityandreliabilityofanoveliphonemethodtorapidlymeasurecervicalsagittalparameters
AT feihan validityandreliabilityofanoveliphonemethodtorapidlymeasurecervicalsagittalparameters
AT zhenghanhan validityandreliabilityofanoveliphonemethodtorapidlymeasurecervicalsagittalparameters
AT hangzhang validityandreliabilityofanoveliphonemethodtorapidlymeasurecervicalsagittalparameters
AT tianjihuang validityandreliabilityofanoveliphonemethodtorapidlymeasurecervicalsagittalparameters
AT xiaojiluo validityandreliabilityofanoveliphonemethodtorapidlymeasurecervicalsagittalparameters