Robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract Robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) is a newly developed bronchoscopic technique for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). The objective of this meta‐analysis was to analyze the diagnostic yield and safety of RAB in patients with PPLs. Five databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chunxi Zhang, Fangfang Xie, Runchang Li, Ningxin Cui, Felix J. F. Herth, Jiayuan Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-03-01
Series:Thoracic Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15229
_version_ 1797277164190564352
author Chunxi Zhang
Fangfang Xie
Runchang Li
Ningxin Cui
Felix J. F. Herth
Jiayuan Sun
author_facet Chunxi Zhang
Fangfang Xie
Runchang Li
Ningxin Cui
Felix J. F. Herth
Jiayuan Sun
author_sort Chunxi Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) is a newly developed bronchoscopic technique for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). The objective of this meta‐analysis was to analyze the diagnostic yield and safety of RAB in patients with PPLs. Five databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched from inception to April 2023. Two independent investigators screened retrieved articles, extracted data, and assessed the study quality. The pooled diagnostic yield and complication rate were estimated. Subgroup analysis was used to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and the Egger test. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to assess the robustness of the synthesized results. A total of 725 lesions from 10 studies were included in this meta‐analysis. No publication bias was found. Overall, RAB had a pooled diagnostic yield of 80.4% (95% CI: 75.7%–85.1%). Lesion size of >30 mm, presence of a bronchus sign, and a concentric radial endobronchial ultrasound view were associated with a statistically significantly higher diagnostic yield. Heterogeneity exploration showed that studies using cryoprobes reported better yields than those without cryoprobes (90.0%, 95% CI: 83.2%–94.7% vs. 79.0%, 95% CI: 75.8%–82.2%, p < 0.01). The pooled complication rate was 3.0% (95% CI: 1.6%–4.4%). In conclusion, RAB is an effective and safe technique for PPLs diagnosis. Further high‐quality prospective studies still need to be conducted.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T15:43:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-98355567eaf842f080c4d4018fed0786
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1759-7706
1759-7714
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T15:43:45Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Thoracic Cancer
spelling doaj.art-98355567eaf842f080c4d4018fed07862024-03-05T06:18:18ZengWileyThoracic Cancer1759-77061759-77142024-03-0115750551210.1111/1759-7714.15229Robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A systematic review and meta‐analysisChunxi Zhang0Fangfang Xie1Runchang Li2Ningxin Cui3Felix J. F. Herth4Jiayuan Sun5Department of Respiratory Endoscopy, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai ChinaDepartment of Respiratory Endoscopy, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai ChinaDepartment of Respiratory Endoscopy, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai ChinaDepartment of Respiratory Endoscopy, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai ChinaDepartment of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik University of Heidelberg Heidelberg GermanyDepartment of Respiratory Endoscopy, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai ChinaAbstract Robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) is a newly developed bronchoscopic technique for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). The objective of this meta‐analysis was to analyze the diagnostic yield and safety of RAB in patients with PPLs. Five databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched from inception to April 2023. Two independent investigators screened retrieved articles, extracted data, and assessed the study quality. The pooled diagnostic yield and complication rate were estimated. Subgroup analysis was used to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and the Egger test. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to assess the robustness of the synthesized results. A total of 725 lesions from 10 studies were included in this meta‐analysis. No publication bias was found. Overall, RAB had a pooled diagnostic yield of 80.4% (95% CI: 75.7%–85.1%). Lesion size of >30 mm, presence of a bronchus sign, and a concentric radial endobronchial ultrasound view were associated with a statistically significantly higher diagnostic yield. Heterogeneity exploration showed that studies using cryoprobes reported better yields than those without cryoprobes (90.0%, 95% CI: 83.2%–94.7% vs. 79.0%, 95% CI: 75.8%–82.2%, p < 0.01). The pooled complication rate was 3.0% (95% CI: 1.6%–4.4%). In conclusion, RAB is an effective and safe technique for PPLs diagnosis. Further high‐quality prospective studies still need to be conducted.https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15229bronchoscopylung cancermeta‐analysisperipheral pulmonary lesionrobotic‐assisted bronchoscopy
spellingShingle Chunxi Zhang
Fangfang Xie
Runchang Li
Ningxin Cui
Felix J. F. Herth
Jiayuan Sun
Robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Thoracic Cancer
bronchoscopy
lung cancer
meta‐analysis
peripheral pulmonary lesion
robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy
title Robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort robotic assisted bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions a systematic review and meta analysis
topic bronchoscopy
lung cancer
meta‐analysis
peripheral pulmonary lesion
robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15229
work_keys_str_mv AT chunxizhang roboticassistedbronchoscopyforthediagnosisofperipheralpulmonarylesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fangfangxie roboticassistedbronchoscopyforthediagnosisofperipheralpulmonarylesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT runchangli roboticassistedbronchoscopyforthediagnosisofperipheralpulmonarylesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ningxincui roboticassistedbronchoscopyforthediagnosisofperipheralpulmonarylesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT felixjfherth roboticassistedbronchoscopyforthediagnosisofperipheralpulmonarylesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiayuansun roboticassistedbronchoscopyforthediagnosisofperipheralpulmonarylesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis