A few comments on the «novelty» of the «new war» discourse: «innovation» and tradition

The «transformation of war» and the related need to conceptually «fix» the transition from the concept of «old war» in the concept of «new war» determines the relevance of discussing the methodological issues arising from this transition, related to the rules of constructing a new concept, that is,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. L. Lomako, K. G. Maltsev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Orenburg State University 2020-07-01
Series:Интеллект. Инновации. Инвестиции
Subjects:
Online Access:http://intellekt-izdanie.osu.ru/en/archive_new/4-2020/4-2020-pp.-70-80.html
_version_ 1797861977749454848
author L. L. Lomako
K. G. Maltsev
author_facet L. L. Lomako
K. G. Maltsev
author_sort L. L. Lomako
collection DOAJ
description The «transformation of war» and the related need to conceptually «fix» the transition from the concept of «old war» in the concept of «new war» determines the relevance of discussing the methodological issues arising from this transition, related to the rules of constructing a new concept, that is, philosophical analysis. The purpose of the research is to identify the necessary differences between the classical concept of war (K. Clausewitz) and the discourse of the «new war». The research methodology is defined in the horizon of the «concept of the political» (as an irreducible decision of the sovereign regarding the existential opposition «friend-enemy») and the idea of the sovereign (K. Schmitt) as «making a decision on a state of emergency», constitutive for the essential understanding of war as a «political phenomenon». Based on a consistent distinction between «concept» and «discourse», the article considers the main modern ways of reasoning about the «novelty» of «new wars» («new war» by M. Kaldor, «hybrid war» by F. Hoffman, «degenerate war» by M. Shaw, «transformation of war» by M. Kaldor). Creveld), reveals the essential conceptual framework for the construction of the concept of «new war». For the first time, it is concluded that the crisis of sovereignty of the new European States-Nations involves the search for a new «constitutive» for the concept of «new war»; Imperial sovereignty and Imperial legitimacy, theoretically the only ones able to perform this function, due to the reasons discussed in the article, are actually unable to «remove» the «problem» of the sovereignty of Nations-States. The article considers the main approaches to determining the ways of forming the «Imperial political space»; determined that globalization implies a «singularity» and «universality» Imperial order (G. Moncler), identifies the causes of his «non-reality»; the theory of «greater political space empires», preserving the «sovereignty» suitable for use in theoretical design the changing «world political order». The practical significance of the conclusion about the necessity of consistent distinction and hold the distinction of the concept of «old wars» and «private discourse» of the «new war» first and foremost is the need to preserve the «political concept» arbitrary «reductions» done in the discourses of the «new war» justifying application of the «global players» forces to their advantage.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T22:12:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-983c4f4bf0fb47aba661dadaf4a548cb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-7175
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T22:12:59Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Orenburg State University
record_format Article
series Интеллект. Инновации. Инвестиции
spelling doaj.art-983c4f4bf0fb47aba661dadaf4a548cb2023-03-23T07:28:07ZengOrenburg State UniversityИнтеллект. Инновации. Инвестиции2077-71752020-07-014708010.25198/2077-7175-2020-4-70A few comments on the «novelty» of the «new war» discourse: «innovation» and traditionL. L. Lomako 0K. G. Maltsev1Belgorod State Technological University named after V. G. ShukhovBelgorod State Technological University named after V. G. ShukhovThe «transformation of war» and the related need to conceptually «fix» the transition from the concept of «old war» in the concept of «new war» determines the relevance of discussing the methodological issues arising from this transition, related to the rules of constructing a new concept, that is, philosophical analysis. The purpose of the research is to identify the necessary differences between the classical concept of war (K. Clausewitz) and the discourse of the «new war». The research methodology is defined in the horizon of the «concept of the political» (as an irreducible decision of the sovereign regarding the existential opposition «friend-enemy») and the idea of the sovereign (K. Schmitt) as «making a decision on a state of emergency», constitutive for the essential understanding of war as a «political phenomenon». Based on a consistent distinction between «concept» and «discourse», the article considers the main modern ways of reasoning about the «novelty» of «new wars» («new war» by M. Kaldor, «hybrid war» by F. Hoffman, «degenerate war» by M. Shaw, «transformation of war» by M. Kaldor). Creveld), reveals the essential conceptual framework for the construction of the concept of «new war». For the first time, it is concluded that the crisis of sovereignty of the new European States-Nations involves the search for a new «constitutive» for the concept of «new war»; Imperial sovereignty and Imperial legitimacy, theoretically the only ones able to perform this function, due to the reasons discussed in the article, are actually unable to «remove» the «problem» of the sovereignty of Nations-States. The article considers the main approaches to determining the ways of forming the «Imperial political space»; determined that globalization implies a «singularity» and «universality» Imperial order (G. Moncler), identifies the causes of his «non-reality»; the theory of «greater political space empires», preserving the «sovereignty» suitable for use in theoretical design the changing «world political order». The practical significance of the conclusion about the necessity of consistent distinction and hold the distinction of the concept of «old wars» and «private discourse» of the «new war» first and foremost is the need to preserve the «political concept» arbitrary «reductions» done in the discourses of the «new war» justifying application of the «global players» forces to their advantage.http://intellekt-izdanie.osu.ru/en/archive_new/4-2020/4-2020-pp.-70-80.htmlwar«new war»sovereignempire«political space»«radical conceptuality»«concept of the political»discourse
spellingShingle L. L. Lomako
K. G. Maltsev
A few comments on the «novelty» of the «new war» discourse: «innovation» and tradition
Интеллект. Инновации. Инвестиции
war
«new war»
sovereign
empire
«political space»
«radical conceptuality»
«concept of the political»
discourse
title A few comments on the «novelty» of the «new war» discourse: «innovation» and tradition
title_full A few comments on the «novelty» of the «new war» discourse: «innovation» and tradition
title_fullStr A few comments on the «novelty» of the «new war» discourse: «innovation» and tradition
title_full_unstemmed A few comments on the «novelty» of the «new war» discourse: «innovation» and tradition
title_short A few comments on the «novelty» of the «new war» discourse: «innovation» and tradition
title_sort few comments on the novelty of the new war discourse innovation and tradition
topic war
«new war»
sovereign
empire
«political space»
«radical conceptuality»
«concept of the political»
discourse
url http://intellekt-izdanie.osu.ru/en/archive_new/4-2020/4-2020-pp.-70-80.html
work_keys_str_mv AT lllomako afewcommentsonthenoveltyofthenewwardiscourseinnovationandtradition
AT kgmaltsev afewcommentsonthenoveltyofthenewwardiscourseinnovationandtradition
AT lllomako fewcommentsonthenoveltyofthenewwardiscourseinnovationandtradition
AT kgmaltsev fewcommentsonthenoveltyofthenewwardiscourseinnovationandtradition