Therapeutic Alliance in Technology-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Depression: Systematic Review

BackgroundThere is growing evidence that technology-based interventions (TBIs) are effective for the treatment of depression. As TBIs are gaining acceptance, a question arises whether good therapeutic alliance, considered a key aspect of psychotherapy, can be established without or with minimal face...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wehmann, Eileen, Köhnen, Moritz, Härter, Martin, Liebherz, Sarah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of Medical Internet Research
Online Access:http://www.jmir.org/2020/6/e17195/
_version_ 1818565430068903936
author Wehmann, Eileen
Köhnen, Moritz
Härter, Martin
Liebherz, Sarah
author_facet Wehmann, Eileen
Köhnen, Moritz
Härter, Martin
Liebherz, Sarah
author_sort Wehmann, Eileen
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThere is growing evidence that technology-based interventions (TBIs) are effective for the treatment of depression. As TBIs are gaining acceptance, a question arises whether good therapeutic alliance, considered a key aspect of psychotherapy, can be established without or with minimal face-to-face contact or rather changes if blended concepts are applied. While therapeutic alliance has been studied extensively in the context of face-to-face therapy, only few studies have reviewed evidence on alliance ratings in TBIs. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine therapeutic alliance in technology-based psychological interventions for the treatment of depression. MethodsWe searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, CINAHL, clinical trial registers, and sources of grey literature for randomized controlled trials on TBIs in the treatment of adults with unipolar depression. All publications were selected according to prespecified criteria. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. ResultsA total of eight out of 98 studies (9.5%) included in the review on TBIs for depression considered therapeutic alliance as part of their evaluation. The available data covered eight different treatment conditions, including four stand-alone treatments (face-to-face psychotherapy, email, telephone, and internet program) and four combined treatments (face-to-face psychotherapy plus a smartphone app and an internet program combined with face-to-face psychotherapy, treatment as usual, or email/telephone). On average, patients rated the alliance positively across all groups. Importantly, no relevant group differences regarding therapeutic alliance sum scores were found in any of the studies. Five studies investigated the relationship between patients’ alliance ratings and treatment outcome, revealing mixed results. ConclusionsOur results suggest that it is possible to establish a positive therapeutic alliance across a variety of different TBIs for depression, but this is based on a small number of studies. Future research needs to determine on what basis therapeutic alliance is formed in settings that do not allow for additional nonverbal cues, perhaps with adapted instruments to measure therapeutic alliance. Trial RegistrationPROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42016050413; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42016050413) International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028042
first_indexed 2024-12-14T01:41:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9844aa12d1c4477ba2d91a9ef17921ff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1438-8871
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T01:41:15Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Medical Internet Research
spelling doaj.art-9844aa12d1c4477ba2d91a9ef17921ff2022-12-21T23:21:44ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712020-06-01226e1719510.2196/17195Therapeutic Alliance in Technology-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Depression: Systematic ReviewWehmann, EileenKöhnen, MoritzHärter, MartinLiebherz, SarahBackgroundThere is growing evidence that technology-based interventions (TBIs) are effective for the treatment of depression. As TBIs are gaining acceptance, a question arises whether good therapeutic alliance, considered a key aspect of psychotherapy, can be established without or with minimal face-to-face contact or rather changes if blended concepts are applied. While therapeutic alliance has been studied extensively in the context of face-to-face therapy, only few studies have reviewed evidence on alliance ratings in TBIs. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine therapeutic alliance in technology-based psychological interventions for the treatment of depression. MethodsWe searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, CINAHL, clinical trial registers, and sources of grey literature for randomized controlled trials on TBIs in the treatment of adults with unipolar depression. All publications were selected according to prespecified criteria. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. ResultsA total of eight out of 98 studies (9.5%) included in the review on TBIs for depression considered therapeutic alliance as part of their evaluation. The available data covered eight different treatment conditions, including four stand-alone treatments (face-to-face psychotherapy, email, telephone, and internet program) and four combined treatments (face-to-face psychotherapy plus a smartphone app and an internet program combined with face-to-face psychotherapy, treatment as usual, or email/telephone). On average, patients rated the alliance positively across all groups. Importantly, no relevant group differences regarding therapeutic alliance sum scores were found in any of the studies. Five studies investigated the relationship between patients’ alliance ratings and treatment outcome, revealing mixed results. ConclusionsOur results suggest that it is possible to establish a positive therapeutic alliance across a variety of different TBIs for depression, but this is based on a small number of studies. Future research needs to determine on what basis therapeutic alliance is formed in settings that do not allow for additional nonverbal cues, perhaps with adapted instruments to measure therapeutic alliance. Trial RegistrationPROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42016050413; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42016050413) International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028042http://www.jmir.org/2020/6/e17195/
spellingShingle Wehmann, Eileen
Köhnen, Moritz
Härter, Martin
Liebherz, Sarah
Therapeutic Alliance in Technology-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Depression: Systematic Review
Journal of Medical Internet Research
title Therapeutic Alliance in Technology-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Depression: Systematic Review
title_full Therapeutic Alliance in Technology-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Depression: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Therapeutic Alliance in Technology-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Depression: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic Alliance in Technology-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Depression: Systematic Review
title_short Therapeutic Alliance in Technology-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Depression: Systematic Review
title_sort therapeutic alliance in technology based interventions for the treatment of depression systematic review
url http://www.jmir.org/2020/6/e17195/
work_keys_str_mv AT wehmanneileen therapeuticallianceintechnologybasedinterventionsforthetreatmentofdepressionsystematicreview
AT kohnenmoritz therapeuticallianceintechnologybasedinterventionsforthetreatmentofdepressionsystematicreview
AT hartermartin therapeuticallianceintechnologybasedinterventionsforthetreatmentofdepressionsystematicreview
AT liebherzsarah therapeuticallianceintechnologybasedinterventionsforthetreatmentofdepressionsystematicreview