Prognosis in Neurological Intensive Care Unit

Objective: Neurocritical care, or neurological intensive care, provides critical care for patients with neurological or neurosurgical diseases. These patients need to receive medical care for their primary critical illnesses, comorbidities, and complications. This study aims to compare the clinical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tuğçe Mengi, Yahya Tahta, Hadiye Şirin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2023-06-01
Series:Türk Nöroloji Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=tjn&un=TJN-30906
_version_ 1797783878512934912
author Tuğçe Mengi
Yahya Tahta
Hadiye Şirin
author_facet Tuğçe Mengi
Yahya Tahta
Hadiye Şirin
author_sort Tuğçe Mengi
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Neurocritical care, or neurological intensive care, provides critical care for patients with neurological or neurosurgical diseases. These patients need to receive medical care for their primary critical illnesses, comorbidities, and complications. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with neurological or neurosurgical diseases treated in general ICUs and those of patients treated in neurological intensive care units (neuro-ICU). Materials and Methods: Patients with neurological and neurosurgical diseases who were treated in the ICUs by a neurointensivist were included in the study. The patients were categorized into two groups according to their ICU types and the study periods: patients in the mixed general ICU (period-1) and patients in the neuro-ICU (period-2). The records in the hospital automation system and this study's database of patients were evaluated retrospectively. Results: Sixty-one patients in period-1 and 58 patients in period-2 were evaluated. The ICU mortality rate and the ICU and hospital stay duration were lower in the neuro-ICU patients, but this difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). ICU readmission and in-hospital mortality rates were significantly lower in the neuro-ICU patients (P < 0.05). Conclusion: This study analyzed the effect of specialized neurocritical care and neuro-ICU organization on patient clinical outcomes. To achieve better patient management in the neuro-ICU, it is necessary to provide quality improvements in the process's structure, performance, and standardization. In Türkiye, there is a need for studies regarding this subject to establish and agree on standards for neurocritical care.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T00:32:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-98450906063644d0853d8d92b7bede4c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1309-2545
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T00:32:08Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Türk Nöroloji Dergisi
spelling doaj.art-98450906063644d0853d8d92b7bede4c2023-07-10T11:12:46ZengGalenos YayineviTürk Nöroloji Dergisi1309-25452023-06-0129210110510.4274/tnd.2022.30906TJN-30906Prognosis in Neurological Intensive Care UnitTuğçe Mengi0Yahya Tahta1Hadiye Şirin2Nigde Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Neurology, Intensive Care Unit, Nigde, TürkiyeErciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Kayseri, TürkiyeEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Neurology Intensive Care Unit, Izmir, TürkiyeObjective: Neurocritical care, or neurological intensive care, provides critical care for patients with neurological or neurosurgical diseases. These patients need to receive medical care for their primary critical illnesses, comorbidities, and complications. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with neurological or neurosurgical diseases treated in general ICUs and those of patients treated in neurological intensive care units (neuro-ICU). Materials and Methods: Patients with neurological and neurosurgical diseases who were treated in the ICUs by a neurointensivist were included in the study. The patients were categorized into two groups according to their ICU types and the study periods: patients in the mixed general ICU (period-1) and patients in the neuro-ICU (period-2). The records in the hospital automation system and this study's database of patients were evaluated retrospectively. Results: Sixty-one patients in period-1 and 58 patients in period-2 were evaluated. The ICU mortality rate and the ICU and hospital stay duration were lower in the neuro-ICU patients, but this difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). ICU readmission and in-hospital mortality rates were significantly lower in the neuro-ICU patients (P < 0.05). Conclusion: This study analyzed the effect of specialized neurocritical care and neuro-ICU organization on patient clinical outcomes. To achieve better patient management in the neuro-ICU, it is necessary to provide quality improvements in the process's structure, performance, and standardization. In Türkiye, there is a need for studies regarding this subject to establish and agree on standards for neurocritical care.https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=tjn&un=TJN-30906neurocritical careintensive careoutcomemortalitystroke
spellingShingle Tuğçe Mengi
Yahya Tahta
Hadiye Şirin
Prognosis in Neurological Intensive Care Unit
Türk Nöroloji Dergisi
neurocritical care
intensive care
outcome
mortality
stroke
title Prognosis in Neurological Intensive Care Unit
title_full Prognosis in Neurological Intensive Care Unit
title_fullStr Prognosis in Neurological Intensive Care Unit
title_full_unstemmed Prognosis in Neurological Intensive Care Unit
title_short Prognosis in Neurological Intensive Care Unit
title_sort prognosis in neurological intensive care unit
topic neurocritical care
intensive care
outcome
mortality
stroke
url https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=tjn&un=TJN-30906
work_keys_str_mv AT tugcemengi prognosisinneurologicalintensivecareunit
AT yahyatahta prognosisinneurologicalintensivecareunit
AT hadiyesirin prognosisinneurologicalintensivecareunit