Barriers to recruitment when conducting a commissioned randomised controlled trial of medication versus psychological therapy for generalised anxiety disorder: some lessons learned

Abstract Background Poor recruitment is the most common reason for premature discontinuation of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). An RCT of medication versus psychological therapy for generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) was discontinued prematurely by the UK National Institute of Health Research f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anastasia K. Kalpakidou, John Cape, Tarun J. Limbachya, Irwin Nazareth, Marta Buszewicz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-05-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3385-5
_version_ 1831791548624273408
author Anastasia K. Kalpakidou
John Cape
Tarun J. Limbachya
Irwin Nazareth
Marta Buszewicz
author_facet Anastasia K. Kalpakidou
John Cape
Tarun J. Limbachya
Irwin Nazareth
Marta Buszewicz
author_sort Anastasia K. Kalpakidou
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Poor recruitment is the most common reason for premature discontinuation of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). An RCT of medication versus psychological therapy for generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) was discontinued prematurely by the UK National Institute of Health Research funders because of recruitment failure. In order to inform future research studies, this article explores the reasons for poor recruitment and aspects which could have been improved. Methods The trial recruited participants via psychological well-being practitioners (PWPs) employed within local Improving Assess to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services at four sites in England. For this study, we initially examined the recruitment data to identify reasons why potential participants were reluctant to participate in the trial. We then investigated reasons the PWPs did not identify more potential participants. Finally, we performed retrospective analyses of a computerised clinical records system used by the IAPT services in this study. These analyses aimed to establish the number of potential participants who had not been approached about the trial as well as whether there were additional factors affecting the numbers of people who might be eligible to take part. Data were obtained for all patients assessed during the period from the date on which recruitment commenced until the closure of the trial. Results Three quarters of those patients identified as possibly suitable for the trial declined to take part; the great majority did so because they did not want to be randomly assigned to receive medication. Our retrospective database analyses showed that only around 12% of potentially eligible patients for the trial were identified by the PWPs at the pilot sites. The results also indicated that only 5% of those noted at entry to the IAPT services to have a score of at least 10 on the GAD-7 questionnaire (a self-completed questionnaire with high sensitivity and specificity for GAD) would have been eligible for the trial. Conclusions Our findings suggest that poor recruitment to RCTs can be significantly affected by participants’ treatment preferences and by factors influencing the recruiting clinicians. It may also be important not to include too many restrictions on inclusion criteria for pragmatic trials aiming for generalisable results. Trial registration ISCRTN14845583. Registration date: 5 February 2015.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T14:54:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-984581416d6f4aa486e72f96fa42d480
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1745-6215
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T14:54:52Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Trials
spelling doaj.art-984581416d6f4aa486e72f96fa42d4802022-12-21T18:22:14ZengBMCTrials1745-62152019-05-012011910.1186/s13063-019-3385-5Barriers to recruitment when conducting a commissioned randomised controlled trial of medication versus psychological therapy for generalised anxiety disorder: some lessons learnedAnastasia K. Kalpakidou0John Cape1Tarun J. Limbachya2Irwin Nazareth3Marta Buszewicz4Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department (MCPCRD), University College London, Division of PsychiatryResearch Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, Division of Psychology & Language SciencesUniversity of East London, Department of Clinical Psychology, Stratford CampusResearch Department of Primary Care & Population Health (PCPH), University College London, Institute of Epidemiology & Health CareResearch Department of Primary Care & Population Health (PCPH), University College London, Institute of Epidemiology & Health CareAbstract Background Poor recruitment is the most common reason for premature discontinuation of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). An RCT of medication versus psychological therapy for generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) was discontinued prematurely by the UK National Institute of Health Research funders because of recruitment failure. In order to inform future research studies, this article explores the reasons for poor recruitment and aspects which could have been improved. Methods The trial recruited participants via psychological well-being practitioners (PWPs) employed within local Improving Assess to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services at four sites in England. For this study, we initially examined the recruitment data to identify reasons why potential participants were reluctant to participate in the trial. We then investigated reasons the PWPs did not identify more potential participants. Finally, we performed retrospective analyses of a computerised clinical records system used by the IAPT services in this study. These analyses aimed to establish the number of potential participants who had not been approached about the trial as well as whether there were additional factors affecting the numbers of people who might be eligible to take part. Data were obtained for all patients assessed during the period from the date on which recruitment commenced until the closure of the trial. Results Three quarters of those patients identified as possibly suitable for the trial declined to take part; the great majority did so because they did not want to be randomly assigned to receive medication. Our retrospective database analyses showed that only around 12% of potentially eligible patients for the trial were identified by the PWPs at the pilot sites. The results also indicated that only 5% of those noted at entry to the IAPT services to have a score of at least 10 on the GAD-7 questionnaire (a self-completed questionnaire with high sensitivity and specificity for GAD) would have been eligible for the trial. Conclusions Our findings suggest that poor recruitment to RCTs can be significantly affected by participants’ treatment preferences and by factors influencing the recruiting clinicians. It may also be important not to include too many restrictions on inclusion criteria for pragmatic trials aiming for generalisable results. Trial registration ISCRTN14845583. Registration date: 5 February 2015.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3385-5Randomised controlled trialBarriers to recruitmentGeneralised anxiety disorderMedicationPsychological therapy
spellingShingle Anastasia K. Kalpakidou
John Cape
Tarun J. Limbachya
Irwin Nazareth
Marta Buszewicz
Barriers to recruitment when conducting a commissioned randomised controlled trial of medication versus psychological therapy for generalised anxiety disorder: some lessons learned
Trials
Randomised controlled trial
Barriers to recruitment
Generalised anxiety disorder
Medication
Psychological therapy
title Barriers to recruitment when conducting a commissioned randomised controlled trial of medication versus psychological therapy for generalised anxiety disorder: some lessons learned
title_full Barriers to recruitment when conducting a commissioned randomised controlled trial of medication versus psychological therapy for generalised anxiety disorder: some lessons learned
title_fullStr Barriers to recruitment when conducting a commissioned randomised controlled trial of medication versus psychological therapy for generalised anxiety disorder: some lessons learned
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to recruitment when conducting a commissioned randomised controlled trial of medication versus psychological therapy for generalised anxiety disorder: some lessons learned
title_short Barriers to recruitment when conducting a commissioned randomised controlled trial of medication versus psychological therapy for generalised anxiety disorder: some lessons learned
title_sort barriers to recruitment when conducting a commissioned randomised controlled trial of medication versus psychological therapy for generalised anxiety disorder some lessons learned
topic Randomised controlled trial
Barriers to recruitment
Generalised anxiety disorder
Medication
Psychological therapy
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3385-5
work_keys_str_mv AT anastasiakkalpakidou barrierstorecruitmentwhenconductingacommissionedrandomisedcontrolledtrialofmedicationversuspsychologicaltherapyforgeneralisedanxietydisordersomelessonslearned
AT johncape barrierstorecruitmentwhenconductingacommissionedrandomisedcontrolledtrialofmedicationversuspsychologicaltherapyforgeneralisedanxietydisordersomelessonslearned
AT tarunjlimbachya barrierstorecruitmentwhenconductingacommissionedrandomisedcontrolledtrialofmedicationversuspsychologicaltherapyforgeneralisedanxietydisordersomelessonslearned
AT irwinnazareth barrierstorecruitmentwhenconductingacommissionedrandomisedcontrolledtrialofmedicationversuspsychologicaltherapyforgeneralisedanxietydisordersomelessonslearned
AT martabuszewicz barrierstorecruitmentwhenconductingacommissionedrandomisedcontrolledtrialofmedicationversuspsychologicaltherapyforgeneralisedanxietydisordersomelessonslearned