Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats
Regeneration of periodontal and alveolar ridge defects utilizing membranes is a well-established procedure in reconstructive surgery. Biomaterial characteristics and membrane design employed in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) techniques play an important role in good results. The purpose of this hi...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
2003-01-01
|
Series: | Brazilian Dental Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402003000200009 |
_version_ | 1828468142985183232 |
---|---|
author | Macedo Nelson Luiz de Macedo Luís Guilherme Scavone de Matuda Fábio da Silva Ouchi Suzana Martins Monteiro Adriana Socorro Ferreira Carvalho Yasmin Rodarte |
author_facet | Macedo Nelson Luiz de Macedo Luís Guilherme Scavone de Matuda Fábio da Silva Ouchi Suzana Martins Monteiro Adriana Socorro Ferreira Carvalho Yasmin Rodarte |
author_sort | Macedo Nelson Luiz de |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Regeneration of periodontal and alveolar ridge defects utilizing membranes is a well-established procedure in reconstructive surgery. Biomaterial characteristics and membrane design employed in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) techniques play an important role in good results. The purpose of this histologic experimental study in rats was to compare the use of two physical barriers in the osteopromotion by using GTR principles in bone defects created in tibias. Fifteen animals divided into 3groups were used: group I (non-porous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) barrier), group II (coral hydroxyapatite (HA) blocks), and group III (defects that received no physical barrier). Histological examination showed varied amounts of newly formed bone beneath both types of barriers. The non-porous PTFE barrier showed better results than the HA group. The results of this study suggest that bone regeneration can be successfully enhanced by a submerged membrane technique. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T04:17:52Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-98587e8e30ba410abffc795b3dc51e62 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0103-6440 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T04:17:52Z |
publishDate | 2003-01-01 |
publisher | Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
record_format | Article |
series | Brazilian Dental Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-98587e8e30ba410abffc795b3dc51e622022-12-22T01:21:12ZengFundação Odontológica de Ribeirão PretoBrazilian Dental Journal0103-64402003-01-01142119124Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in ratsMacedo Nelson Luiz deMacedo Luís Guilherme Scavone deMatuda Fábio da SilvaOuchi Suzana MartinsMonteiro Adriana Socorro FerreiraCarvalho Yasmin RodarteRegeneration of periodontal and alveolar ridge defects utilizing membranes is a well-established procedure in reconstructive surgery. Biomaterial characteristics and membrane design employed in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) techniques play an important role in good results. The purpose of this histologic experimental study in rats was to compare the use of two physical barriers in the osteopromotion by using GTR principles in bone defects created in tibias. Fifteen animals divided into 3groups were used: group I (non-porous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) barrier), group II (coral hydroxyapatite (HA) blocks), and group III (defects that received no physical barrier). Histological examination showed varied amounts of newly formed bone beneath both types of barriers. The non-porous PTFE barrier showed better results than the HA group. The results of this study suggest that bone regeneration can be successfully enhanced by a submerged membrane technique.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402003000200009guided bone regenerationwound healingpolytetrafluoroethylene membranehydroxyapatite |
spellingShingle | Macedo Nelson Luiz de Macedo Luís Guilherme Scavone de Matuda Fábio da Silva Ouchi Suzana Martins Monteiro Adriana Socorro Ferreira Carvalho Yasmin Rodarte Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats Brazilian Dental Journal guided bone regeneration wound healing polytetrafluoroethylene membrane hydroxyapatite |
title | Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats |
title_full | Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats |
title_fullStr | Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats |
title_full_unstemmed | Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats |
title_short | Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats |
title_sort | guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of ptfe and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats |
topic | guided bone regeneration wound healing polytetrafluoroethylene membrane hydroxyapatite |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402003000200009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT macedonelsonluizde guidedboneregenerationwithsubperiostealimplantsofptfeandhydroxyapatitephysicalbarriersinrats AT macedoluisguilhermescavonede guidedboneregenerationwithsubperiostealimplantsofptfeandhydroxyapatitephysicalbarriersinrats AT matudafabiodasilva guidedboneregenerationwithsubperiostealimplantsofptfeandhydroxyapatitephysicalbarriersinrats AT ouchisuzanamartins guidedboneregenerationwithsubperiostealimplantsofptfeandhydroxyapatitephysicalbarriersinrats AT monteiroadrianasocorroferreira guidedboneregenerationwithsubperiostealimplantsofptfeandhydroxyapatitephysicalbarriersinrats AT carvalhoyasminrodarte guidedboneregenerationwithsubperiostealimplantsofptfeandhydroxyapatitephysicalbarriersinrats |