Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats

Regeneration of periodontal and alveolar ridge defects utilizing membranes is a well-established procedure in reconstructive surgery. Biomaterial characteristics and membrane design employed in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) techniques play an important role in good results. The purpose of this hi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Macedo Nelson Luiz de, Macedo Luís Guilherme Scavone de, Matuda Fábio da Silva, Ouchi Suzana Martins, Monteiro Adriana Socorro Ferreira, Carvalho Yasmin Rodarte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto 2003-01-01
Series:Brazilian Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402003000200009
_version_ 1828468142985183232
author Macedo Nelson Luiz de
Macedo Luís Guilherme Scavone de
Matuda Fábio da Silva
Ouchi Suzana Martins
Monteiro Adriana Socorro Ferreira
Carvalho Yasmin Rodarte
author_facet Macedo Nelson Luiz de
Macedo Luís Guilherme Scavone de
Matuda Fábio da Silva
Ouchi Suzana Martins
Monteiro Adriana Socorro Ferreira
Carvalho Yasmin Rodarte
author_sort Macedo Nelson Luiz de
collection DOAJ
description Regeneration of periodontal and alveolar ridge defects utilizing membranes is a well-established procedure in reconstructive surgery. Biomaterial characteristics and membrane design employed in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) techniques play an important role in good results. The purpose of this histologic experimental study in rats was to compare the use of two physical barriers in the osteopromotion by using GTR principles in bone defects created in tibias. Fifteen animals divided into 3groups were used: group I (non-porous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) barrier), group II (coral hydroxyapatite (HA) blocks), and group III (defects that received no physical barrier). Histological examination showed varied amounts of newly formed bone beneath both types of barriers. The non-porous PTFE barrier showed better results than the HA group. The results of this study suggest that bone regeneration can be successfully enhanced by a submerged membrane technique.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T04:17:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-98587e8e30ba410abffc795b3dc51e62
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0103-6440
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T04:17:52Z
publishDate 2003-01-01
publisher Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
record_format Article
series Brazilian Dental Journal
spelling doaj.art-98587e8e30ba410abffc795b3dc51e622022-12-22T01:21:12ZengFundação Odontológica de Ribeirão PretoBrazilian Dental Journal0103-64402003-01-01142119124Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in ratsMacedo Nelson Luiz deMacedo Luís Guilherme Scavone deMatuda Fábio da SilvaOuchi Suzana MartinsMonteiro Adriana Socorro FerreiraCarvalho Yasmin RodarteRegeneration of periodontal and alveolar ridge defects utilizing membranes is a well-established procedure in reconstructive surgery. Biomaterial characteristics and membrane design employed in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) techniques play an important role in good results. The purpose of this histologic experimental study in rats was to compare the use of two physical barriers in the osteopromotion by using GTR principles in bone defects created in tibias. Fifteen animals divided into 3groups were used: group I (non-porous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) barrier), group II (coral hydroxyapatite (HA) blocks), and group III (defects that received no physical barrier). Histological examination showed varied amounts of newly formed bone beneath both types of barriers. The non-porous PTFE barrier showed better results than the HA group. The results of this study suggest that bone regeneration can be successfully enhanced by a submerged membrane technique.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402003000200009guided bone regenerationwound healingpolytetrafluoroethylene membranehydroxyapatite
spellingShingle Macedo Nelson Luiz de
Macedo Luís Guilherme Scavone de
Matuda Fábio da Silva
Ouchi Suzana Martins
Monteiro Adriana Socorro Ferreira
Carvalho Yasmin Rodarte
Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats
Brazilian Dental Journal
guided bone regeneration
wound healing
polytetrafluoroethylene membrane
hydroxyapatite
title Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats
title_full Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats
title_fullStr Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats
title_full_unstemmed Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats
title_short Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats
title_sort guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of ptfe and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats
topic guided bone regeneration
wound healing
polytetrafluoroethylene membrane
hydroxyapatite
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402003000200009
work_keys_str_mv AT macedonelsonluizde guidedboneregenerationwithsubperiostealimplantsofptfeandhydroxyapatitephysicalbarriersinrats
AT macedoluisguilhermescavonede guidedboneregenerationwithsubperiostealimplantsofptfeandhydroxyapatitephysicalbarriersinrats
AT matudafabiodasilva guidedboneregenerationwithsubperiostealimplantsofptfeandhydroxyapatitephysicalbarriersinrats
AT ouchisuzanamartins guidedboneregenerationwithsubperiostealimplantsofptfeandhydroxyapatitephysicalbarriersinrats
AT monteiroadrianasocorroferreira guidedboneregenerationwithsubperiostealimplantsofptfeandhydroxyapatitephysicalbarriersinrats
AT carvalhoyasminrodarte guidedboneregenerationwithsubperiostealimplantsofptfeandhydroxyapatitephysicalbarriersinrats