A test of numerical instability and stiffness in the parametrizations of the ARPÉGE and ALADIN models

Meteorological numerical weather prediction (NWP) models solve a system of partial differential equations in time and space. Semi-lagrangian advection schemes allow for long time steps. These longer time steps can result in instabilities occurring in the model physics. A system of differential equat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. Tudor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2013-07-01
Series:Geoscientific Model Development
Online Access:http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/901/2013/gmd-6-901-2013.pdf
_version_ 1818163236432773120
author M. Tudor
author_facet M. Tudor
author_sort M. Tudor
collection DOAJ
description Meteorological numerical weather prediction (NWP) models solve a system of partial differential equations in time and space. Semi-lagrangian advection schemes allow for long time steps. These longer time steps can result in instabilities occurring in the model physics. A system of differential equations in which some solution components decay more rapidly than others is stiff. In this case it is stability rather than accuracy that restricts the time step. The vertical diffusion parametrization can cause fast non-meteorological oscillations around the slowly evolving true solution (fibrillations). These are treated with an anti-fibrillation scheme, but small oscillations remain in operational weather forecasts using ARPÉGE and ALADIN models. In this paper, a simple test is designed to reveal if the formulation of particular a physical parametrization is a stiff problem or potentially numerically unstable in combination with any other part of the model. When the test is applied to a stable scheme, the solution remains stable. However, applying the test to a potentially unstable scheme yields a solution with fibrillations of substantial amplitude. The parametrizations of the NWP model ARPÉGE were tested one by one to see which one may be the source of unstable model behaviour. The test identified the set of equations in the stratiform precipitation scheme (a diagnostic Kessler-type scheme) as a stiff problem, particularly the combination of terms arising due to the evaporation of snow.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T16:46:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-985fb2838c96477d87afe6229a2e1454
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1991-959X
1991-9603
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T16:46:21Z
publishDate 2013-07-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Geoscientific Model Development
spelling doaj.art-985fb2838c96477d87afe6229a2e14542022-12-22T00:58:12ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032013-07-016490191310.5194/gmd-6-901-2013A test of numerical instability and stiffness in the parametrizations of the ARPÉGE and ALADIN modelsM. TudorMeteorological numerical weather prediction (NWP) models solve a system of partial differential equations in time and space. Semi-lagrangian advection schemes allow for long time steps. These longer time steps can result in instabilities occurring in the model physics. A system of differential equations in which some solution components decay more rapidly than others is stiff. In this case it is stability rather than accuracy that restricts the time step. The vertical diffusion parametrization can cause fast non-meteorological oscillations around the slowly evolving true solution (fibrillations). These are treated with an anti-fibrillation scheme, but small oscillations remain in operational weather forecasts using ARPÉGE and ALADIN models. In this paper, a simple test is designed to reveal if the formulation of particular a physical parametrization is a stiff problem or potentially numerically unstable in combination with any other part of the model. When the test is applied to a stable scheme, the solution remains stable. However, applying the test to a potentially unstable scheme yields a solution with fibrillations of substantial amplitude. The parametrizations of the NWP model ARPÉGE were tested one by one to see which one may be the source of unstable model behaviour. The test identified the set of equations in the stratiform precipitation scheme (a diagnostic Kessler-type scheme) as a stiff problem, particularly the combination of terms arising due to the evaporation of snow.http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/901/2013/gmd-6-901-2013.pdf
spellingShingle M. Tudor
A test of numerical instability and stiffness in the parametrizations of the ARPÉGE and ALADIN models
Geoscientific Model Development
title A test of numerical instability and stiffness in the parametrizations of the ARPÉGE and ALADIN models
title_full A test of numerical instability and stiffness in the parametrizations of the ARPÉGE and ALADIN models
title_fullStr A test of numerical instability and stiffness in the parametrizations of the ARPÉGE and ALADIN models
title_full_unstemmed A test of numerical instability and stiffness in the parametrizations of the ARPÉGE and ALADIN models
title_short A test of numerical instability and stiffness in the parametrizations of the ARPÉGE and ALADIN models
title_sort test of numerical instability and stiffness in the parametrizations of the arpege and aladin models
url http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/901/2013/gmd-6-901-2013.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mtudor atestofnumericalinstabilityandstiffnessintheparametrizationsofthearpegeandaladinmodels
AT mtudor testofnumericalinstabilityandstiffnessintheparametrizationsofthearpegeandaladinmodels