A Defence of a Rationalist Conception of Practical Reason

In this paper I attempt to refute the instrumental conception of practical reason, and thus defend a rationalist conception of practical reason. I argue that, far from merely playing an instrumental role, reason can be used by an agent to evaluate, that is, to approve or reject, final ends, which mi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gal Yehezkel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Rijeka. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences 2017-12-01
Series:European Journal of Analytic Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hrcak.srce.hr/188212
_version_ 1818234442085302272
author Gal Yehezkel
author_facet Gal Yehezkel
author_sort Gal Yehezkel
collection DOAJ
description In this paper I attempt to refute the instrumental conception of practical reason, and thus defend a rationalist conception of practical reason. I argue that, far from merely playing an instrumental role, reason can be used by an agent to evaluate, that is, to approve or reject, final ends, which might be suggested by desires, and further to determine final ends independently of any desires, whether actual or potential, that the agent might have. My argument relies on an analysis of the concept of intention, and, more specifically, on the distinction between want and intention. I argue that the notion of an intentional action entails that reason can be used to evaluate and determine final ends.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T11:38:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-986136fbc73242bda414549a3e15cfe5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1845-8475
1845-8475
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T11:38:08Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher University of Rijeka. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
record_format Article
series European Journal of Analytic Philosophy
spelling doaj.art-986136fbc73242bda414549a3e15cfe52022-12-22T00:25:37ZengUniversity of Rijeka. Faculty of Humanities and Social SciencesEuropean Journal of Analytic Philosophy1845-84751845-84752017-12-01131395710.31820/ejap.13.1.3A Defence of a Rationalist Conception of Practical ReasonGal Yehezkel0Sapir Academic College and the Open University of IsraelIn this paper I attempt to refute the instrumental conception of practical reason, and thus defend a rationalist conception of practical reason. I argue that, far from merely playing an instrumental role, reason can be used by an agent to evaluate, that is, to approve or reject, final ends, which might be suggested by desires, and further to determine final ends independently of any desires, whether actual or potential, that the agent might have. My argument relies on an analysis of the concept of intention, and, more specifically, on the distinction between want and intention. I argue that the notion of an intentional action entails that reason can be used to evaluate and determine final ends.https://hrcak.srce.hr/188212endinstrumental reasonintentionpractical reasonreason
spellingShingle Gal Yehezkel
A Defence of a Rationalist Conception of Practical Reason
European Journal of Analytic Philosophy
end
instrumental reason
intention
practical reason
reason
title A Defence of a Rationalist Conception of Practical Reason
title_full A Defence of a Rationalist Conception of Practical Reason
title_fullStr A Defence of a Rationalist Conception of Practical Reason
title_full_unstemmed A Defence of a Rationalist Conception of Practical Reason
title_short A Defence of a Rationalist Conception of Practical Reason
title_sort defence of a rationalist conception of practical reason
topic end
instrumental reason
intention
practical reason
reason
url https://hrcak.srce.hr/188212
work_keys_str_mv AT galyehezkel adefenceofarationalistconceptionofpracticalreason
AT galyehezkel defenceofarationalistconceptionofpracticalreason