3563 Clinical research training methods that improve self-efficacy in clinical research domains

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The study aims to determine the current clinical research training interventions of MD-PhD programs and how effective they are in promoting clinical research self-efficacy. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A national survey of MD-PhD trainees was conducted in 2018 to identify clin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mathew Sebastian, Matthew Robinson, Leanne Dumeny, Kyle Dyson, Wayne T. McCormack, William Stratford May
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2019-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866119001511/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811156653773422592
author Mathew Sebastian
Matthew Robinson
Leanne Dumeny
Kyle Dyson
Wayne T. McCormack
William Stratford May
author_facet Mathew Sebastian
Matthew Robinson
Leanne Dumeny
Kyle Dyson
Wayne T. McCormack
William Stratford May
author_sort Mathew Sebastian
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The study aims to determine the current clinical research training interventions of MD-PhD programs and how effective they are in promoting clinical research self-efficacy. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A national survey of MD-PhD trainees was conducted in 2018 to identify clinical research training methods and self-efficacy for clinical research skills. MD-PhD program directors and coordinators from 108 institutions were asked to distribute the survey to their students. Responses were received from 61 institutions (56.5%). Responses were obtained from 647 MD-PhD students in all years of training, representing 17.9% of the 3613 possible participants at the 61 medical schools represented. No compensation was provided for this study. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The primary methods of clinical research training reported by students included didactics, mentored clinical research, didactics plus mentored clinical research, didactics plus clinical research practicum, and didactics plus mentored clinical research plus clinical research practicum. A quarter of all participants reported having no clinical research training. Clinical research self-efficacy was then correlated with the amount of clinical research training. Students exposed to no clinical research had the lowest self-efficacy in clinical research skills and students experiencing didactics plus mentored clinical research plus clinical research practicum had the highest perceived self-efficacy in clinical research domains. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This is one of the first studies assessing clinical research training methods for MD-PhD students and assessing their efficacy. We found that of all students questioned, 25% mentioned had not received any type of clinical research training. The remaining students identified 5 research training methods that institutions currently use. This work highlights the importance of clinical research experience students need to improve their self-efficacy, a major influence on research career outcomes.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:54:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-986246f912924573b2d625a510a3f417
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-8661
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:54:53Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj.art-986246f912924573b2d625a510a3f4172023-03-09T12:30:28ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612019-03-013646410.1017/cts.2019.1513563 Clinical research training methods that improve self-efficacy in clinical research domainsMathew Sebastian0Matthew Robinson1Leanne Dumeny2Kyle Dyson3Wayne T. McCormack4William Stratford May5University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUniversity of Florida Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUniversity of Florida Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUniversity of Florida Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUniversity of Florida Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUniversity of Florida Clinical and Translational Science InstituteOBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The study aims to determine the current clinical research training interventions of MD-PhD programs and how effective they are in promoting clinical research self-efficacy. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A national survey of MD-PhD trainees was conducted in 2018 to identify clinical research training methods and self-efficacy for clinical research skills. MD-PhD program directors and coordinators from 108 institutions were asked to distribute the survey to their students. Responses were received from 61 institutions (56.5%). Responses were obtained from 647 MD-PhD students in all years of training, representing 17.9% of the 3613 possible participants at the 61 medical schools represented. No compensation was provided for this study. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The primary methods of clinical research training reported by students included didactics, mentored clinical research, didactics plus mentored clinical research, didactics plus clinical research practicum, and didactics plus mentored clinical research plus clinical research practicum. A quarter of all participants reported having no clinical research training. Clinical research self-efficacy was then correlated with the amount of clinical research training. Students exposed to no clinical research had the lowest self-efficacy in clinical research skills and students experiencing didactics plus mentored clinical research plus clinical research practicum had the highest perceived self-efficacy in clinical research domains. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This is one of the first studies assessing clinical research training methods for MD-PhD students and assessing their efficacy. We found that of all students questioned, 25% mentioned had not received any type of clinical research training. The remaining students identified 5 research training methods that institutions currently use. This work highlights the importance of clinical research experience students need to improve their self-efficacy, a major influence on research career outcomes.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866119001511/type/journal_article
spellingShingle Mathew Sebastian
Matthew Robinson
Leanne Dumeny
Kyle Dyson
Wayne T. McCormack
William Stratford May
3563 Clinical research training methods that improve self-efficacy in clinical research domains
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
title 3563 Clinical research training methods that improve self-efficacy in clinical research domains
title_full 3563 Clinical research training methods that improve self-efficacy in clinical research domains
title_fullStr 3563 Clinical research training methods that improve self-efficacy in clinical research domains
title_full_unstemmed 3563 Clinical research training methods that improve self-efficacy in clinical research domains
title_short 3563 Clinical research training methods that improve self-efficacy in clinical research domains
title_sort 3563 clinical research training methods that improve self efficacy in clinical research domains
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866119001511/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT mathewsebastian 3563clinicalresearchtrainingmethodsthatimproveselfefficacyinclinicalresearchdomains
AT matthewrobinson 3563clinicalresearchtrainingmethodsthatimproveselfefficacyinclinicalresearchdomains
AT leannedumeny 3563clinicalresearchtrainingmethodsthatimproveselfefficacyinclinicalresearchdomains
AT kyledyson 3563clinicalresearchtrainingmethodsthatimproveselfefficacyinclinicalresearchdomains
AT waynetmccormack 3563clinicalresearchtrainingmethodsthatimproveselfefficacyinclinicalresearchdomains
AT williamstratfordmay 3563clinicalresearchtrainingmethodsthatimproveselfefficacyinclinicalresearchdomains