Keeping the promise: a critique of the current state of microdosing research

IntroductionThe practice of taking small, sub-hallucinogenic doses of psychedelics, known as microdosing, has exploded in popularity over the last decade. Users claim benefits ranging from improved mood and enhanced creativity to an increased sense of meaning and connectedness in life. While researc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rotem Petranker, Thomas Anderson, Emily C. Fewster, Youval Aberman, Marik Hazan, Michael Gaffrey, Paul Seli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1217102/full
_version_ 1797324281328173056
author Rotem Petranker
Thomas Anderson
Emily C. Fewster
Youval Aberman
Marik Hazan
Michael Gaffrey
Paul Seli
author_facet Rotem Petranker
Thomas Anderson
Emily C. Fewster
Youval Aberman
Marik Hazan
Michael Gaffrey
Paul Seli
author_sort Rotem Petranker
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionThe practice of taking small, sub-hallucinogenic doses of psychedelics, known as microdosing, has exploded in popularity over the last decade. Users claim benefits ranging from improved mood and enhanced creativity to an increased sense of meaning and connectedness in life. While research on microdosing is still lagging behind the shift in public opinion, several papers have been published in the last five years which attempted to assess the effects of microdosing.MethodsThis review paper aimed to critically analyze the research practices used in the recent wave of microdosing research: We reviewed 15 papers published before the closing date of this review in March 2022.ResultsOur review concludes that it is premature to draw any conclusions about the efficacy or safety of microdosing since the research quality cannot be considered confirmatory.DiscussionWe propose some potential causes for the current state of the literature and some suggestions for how these causes may be ameliorated.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T05:53:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-98691531a72d4661be069c4674b1fdcd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-0640
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T05:53:50Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-98691531a72d4661be069c4674b1fdcd2024-02-05T05:02:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402024-02-011510.3389/fpsyt.2024.12171021217102Keeping the promise: a critique of the current state of microdosing researchRotem Petranker0Thomas Anderson1Emily C. Fewster2Youval Aberman3Marik Hazan4Michael Gaffrey5Paul Seli6Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, Hamilton, ON, CanadaDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaIndependent Researcher, New York, NY, United StatesIndependent Researcher, New York, NY, United StatesIndependent Researcher, New York, NY, United StatesDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesIntroductionThe practice of taking small, sub-hallucinogenic doses of psychedelics, known as microdosing, has exploded in popularity over the last decade. Users claim benefits ranging from improved mood and enhanced creativity to an increased sense of meaning and connectedness in life. While research on microdosing is still lagging behind the shift in public opinion, several papers have been published in the last five years which attempted to assess the effects of microdosing.MethodsThis review paper aimed to critically analyze the research practices used in the recent wave of microdosing research: We reviewed 15 papers published before the closing date of this review in March 2022.ResultsOur review concludes that it is premature to draw any conclusions about the efficacy or safety of microdosing since the research quality cannot be considered confirmatory.DiscussionWe propose some potential causes for the current state of the literature and some suggestions for how these causes may be ameliorated.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1217102/fullpsychedelicsmicrodosingreviewpsilocybinLSD
spellingShingle Rotem Petranker
Thomas Anderson
Emily C. Fewster
Youval Aberman
Marik Hazan
Michael Gaffrey
Paul Seli
Keeping the promise: a critique of the current state of microdosing research
Frontiers in Psychiatry
psychedelics
microdosing
review
psilocybin
LSD
title Keeping the promise: a critique of the current state of microdosing research
title_full Keeping the promise: a critique of the current state of microdosing research
title_fullStr Keeping the promise: a critique of the current state of microdosing research
title_full_unstemmed Keeping the promise: a critique of the current state of microdosing research
title_short Keeping the promise: a critique of the current state of microdosing research
title_sort keeping the promise a critique of the current state of microdosing research
topic psychedelics
microdosing
review
psilocybin
LSD
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1217102/full
work_keys_str_mv AT rotempetranker keepingthepromiseacritiqueofthecurrentstateofmicrodosingresearch
AT thomasanderson keepingthepromiseacritiqueofthecurrentstateofmicrodosingresearch
AT emilycfewster keepingthepromiseacritiqueofthecurrentstateofmicrodosingresearch
AT youvalaberman keepingthepromiseacritiqueofthecurrentstateofmicrodosingresearch
AT marikhazan keepingthepromiseacritiqueofthecurrentstateofmicrodosingresearch
AT michaelgaffrey keepingthepromiseacritiqueofthecurrentstateofmicrodosingresearch
AT paulseli keepingthepromiseacritiqueofthecurrentstateofmicrodosingresearch