Evaluating the accuracy of CAD/CAM optimized stones compared to conventional type IV stones.
This study compared the accuracy (trueness and precision) of stone models fabricated using two brands of CAD/CAM optimized stones Cerec Stone (BC) and Elite Master (EM), and a conventional type IV stone Elite Rock Fast (ERF). 30 conventional Type IV and scannable stone complete-arch models were scan...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282509&type=printable |
| _version_ | 1826545925540020224 |
|---|---|
| author | Gülsüm Ceylan Faruk Emir |
| author_facet | Gülsüm Ceylan Faruk Emir |
| author_sort | Gülsüm Ceylan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study compared the accuracy (trueness and precision) of stone models fabricated using two brands of CAD/CAM optimized stones Cerec Stone (BC) and Elite Master (EM), and a conventional type IV stone Elite Rock Fast (ERF). 30 conventional Type IV and scannable stone complete-arch models were scanned with a blue LED extraoral scanner, and root mean square values were obtained. 6 abutments were used in complete-arch models. The digital models were compared with the master model to evaluate their trueness using model superimposition with Geomagic software. Precision was determined for each case by superimposing combinations of the 10 datasets in each group. The point cloud density of each model was calculated with MeshLab software. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney non-parametric tests were used for the statistical analysis. The trueness of the stone models was 96 μm for the BC, 88.2 μm for the EM, and 87.6 μm for the ERF. There were no significant differences between the tested dental stones (p = .768). However, the EM models (35.6 μm) were more precise than the BC (46.9 μm) and ERF (56.4 μm) models (p = .001, p < .001). EM models also showed the highest point cloud density. There were significant differences in point cloud density (p = .003). The EM models showed significant differences in precision but no significant differences in terms of trueness. Although EM was more precise and had the highest point cloud density, all models were within the clinically acceptable limit. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:13:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9875bb832ee744d9a5635355010597e3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-03-14T05:25:36Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-9875bb832ee744d9a5635355010597e32025-03-06T05:31:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01183e028250910.1371/journal.pone.0282509Evaluating the accuracy of CAD/CAM optimized stones compared to conventional type IV stones.Gülsüm CeylanFaruk EmirThis study compared the accuracy (trueness and precision) of stone models fabricated using two brands of CAD/CAM optimized stones Cerec Stone (BC) and Elite Master (EM), and a conventional type IV stone Elite Rock Fast (ERF). 30 conventional Type IV and scannable stone complete-arch models were scanned with a blue LED extraoral scanner, and root mean square values were obtained. 6 abutments were used in complete-arch models. The digital models were compared with the master model to evaluate their trueness using model superimposition with Geomagic software. Precision was determined for each case by superimposing combinations of the 10 datasets in each group. The point cloud density of each model was calculated with MeshLab software. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney non-parametric tests were used for the statistical analysis. The trueness of the stone models was 96 μm for the BC, 88.2 μm for the EM, and 87.6 μm for the ERF. There were no significant differences between the tested dental stones (p = .768). However, the EM models (35.6 μm) were more precise than the BC (46.9 μm) and ERF (56.4 μm) models (p = .001, p < .001). EM models also showed the highest point cloud density. There were significant differences in point cloud density (p = .003). The EM models showed significant differences in precision but no significant differences in terms of trueness. Although EM was more precise and had the highest point cloud density, all models were within the clinically acceptable limit.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282509&type=printable |
| spellingShingle | Gülsüm Ceylan Faruk Emir Evaluating the accuracy of CAD/CAM optimized stones compared to conventional type IV stones. PLoS ONE |
| title | Evaluating the accuracy of CAD/CAM optimized stones compared to conventional type IV stones. |
| title_full | Evaluating the accuracy of CAD/CAM optimized stones compared to conventional type IV stones. |
| title_fullStr | Evaluating the accuracy of CAD/CAM optimized stones compared to conventional type IV stones. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the accuracy of CAD/CAM optimized stones compared to conventional type IV stones. |
| title_short | Evaluating the accuracy of CAD/CAM optimized stones compared to conventional type IV stones. |
| title_sort | evaluating the accuracy of cad cam optimized stones compared to conventional type iv stones |
| url | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282509&type=printable |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gulsumceylan evaluatingtheaccuracyofcadcamoptimizedstonescomparedtoconventionaltypeivstones AT farukemir evaluatingtheaccuracyofcadcamoptimizedstonescomparedtoconventionaltypeivstones |