Trans-scrotal Incision Approach versus Traditional Trans-scrotal Incision Orchiopexy in Children with Cryptorchidism: A Randomized Trial Study
Background: Although undescended testis (UDT) is the most prevalent malformation in male neonates, the best mode of UDT treatment remains controversial. This study aimed to compare trans-scrotal incision approach with traditional trans-scrotal incision orchiopexy in children suffering from cryptorch...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Advanced Biomedical Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.advbiores.net/article.asp?issn=2277-9175;year=2019;volume=8;issue=1;spage=34;epage=34;aulast=Nazem |
_version_ | 1823927515948777472 |
---|---|
author | Masoud Nazem Mehrdad Hosseinpour Abdulhakim Alghazali |
author_facet | Masoud Nazem Mehrdad Hosseinpour Abdulhakim Alghazali |
author_sort | Masoud Nazem |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Although undescended testis (UDT) is the most prevalent malformation in male neonates, the best mode of UDT treatment remains controversial. This study aimed to compare trans-scrotal incision approach with traditional trans-scrotal incision orchiopexy in children suffering from cryptorchidism. Materials and Methods: This single-blind randomized clinical trial was done on 100 children with UDT who needed surgery. The participants were alternately undergoing trans-scrotal incision orchiopexy (Group I) and traditional inguinal incision orchiopexy (Group II). The success rate and incidence of postoperative complications were evaluated 1 week and 1 month and 6 months after the operation in the two groups. Results: Both the groups were similar in baseline characteristics including age and laterality (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the incidence of wound infection, testicular atrophy, testicular hypotrophy, and relapse (P > 0.05). In addition, the success rates were 98% in Group I and 94% in Group II (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both surgical methods have a high success rate, and there is no significant difference in the incidence of complications; however, in terms of beauty, satisfaction, and shortening the duration of surgery and the duration of hospitalization, trans-scrotal approach was more successful than the traditional method. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-16T20:40:22Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9878357dc0134ded9d4aeca162a2fdfb |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2277-9175 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-16T20:40:22Z |
publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Advanced Biomedical Research |
spelling | doaj.art-9878357dc0134ded9d4aeca162a2fdfb2022-12-21T22:17:06ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAdvanced Biomedical Research2277-91752019-01-0181343410.4103/abr.abr_26_19Trans-scrotal Incision Approach versus Traditional Trans-scrotal Incision Orchiopexy in Children with Cryptorchidism: A Randomized Trial StudyMasoud NazemMehrdad HosseinpourAbdulhakim AlghazaliBackground: Although undescended testis (UDT) is the most prevalent malformation in male neonates, the best mode of UDT treatment remains controversial. This study aimed to compare trans-scrotal incision approach with traditional trans-scrotal incision orchiopexy in children suffering from cryptorchidism. Materials and Methods: This single-blind randomized clinical trial was done on 100 children with UDT who needed surgery. The participants were alternately undergoing trans-scrotal incision orchiopexy (Group I) and traditional inguinal incision orchiopexy (Group II). The success rate and incidence of postoperative complications were evaluated 1 week and 1 month and 6 months after the operation in the two groups. Results: Both the groups were similar in baseline characteristics including age and laterality (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the incidence of wound infection, testicular atrophy, testicular hypotrophy, and relapse (P > 0.05). In addition, the success rates were 98% in Group I and 94% in Group II (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both surgical methods have a high success rate, and there is no significant difference in the incidence of complications; however, in terms of beauty, satisfaction, and shortening the duration of surgery and the duration of hospitalization, trans-scrotal approach was more successful than the traditional method.http://www.advbiores.net/article.asp?issn=2277-9175;year=2019;volume=8;issue=1;spage=34;epage=34;aulast=NazemCryptorchidismorchiopexytraditional trans-scrotal incisiontrans-scrotal incision |
spellingShingle | Masoud Nazem Mehrdad Hosseinpour Abdulhakim Alghazali Trans-scrotal Incision Approach versus Traditional Trans-scrotal Incision Orchiopexy in Children with Cryptorchidism: A Randomized Trial Study Advanced Biomedical Research Cryptorchidism orchiopexy traditional trans-scrotal incision trans-scrotal incision |
title | Trans-scrotal Incision Approach versus Traditional Trans-scrotal Incision Orchiopexy in Children with Cryptorchidism: A Randomized Trial Study |
title_full | Trans-scrotal Incision Approach versus Traditional Trans-scrotal Incision Orchiopexy in Children with Cryptorchidism: A Randomized Trial Study |
title_fullStr | Trans-scrotal Incision Approach versus Traditional Trans-scrotal Incision Orchiopexy in Children with Cryptorchidism: A Randomized Trial Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Trans-scrotal Incision Approach versus Traditional Trans-scrotal Incision Orchiopexy in Children with Cryptorchidism: A Randomized Trial Study |
title_short | Trans-scrotal Incision Approach versus Traditional Trans-scrotal Incision Orchiopexy in Children with Cryptorchidism: A Randomized Trial Study |
title_sort | trans scrotal incision approach versus traditional trans scrotal incision orchiopexy in children with cryptorchidism a randomized trial study |
topic | Cryptorchidism orchiopexy traditional trans-scrotal incision trans-scrotal incision |
url | http://www.advbiores.net/article.asp?issn=2277-9175;year=2019;volume=8;issue=1;spage=34;epage=34;aulast=Nazem |
work_keys_str_mv | AT masoudnazem transscrotalincisionapproachversustraditionaltransscrotalincisionorchiopexyinchildrenwithcryptorchidismarandomizedtrialstudy AT mehrdadhosseinpour transscrotalincisionapproachversustraditionaltransscrotalincisionorchiopexyinchildrenwithcryptorchidismarandomizedtrialstudy AT abdulhakimalghazali transscrotalincisionapproachversustraditionaltransscrotalincisionorchiopexyinchildrenwithcryptorchidismarandomizedtrialstudy |