An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training.
The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) has received attention due to its correlation with collective intelligence. If the RMET is a marker of collective intelligence, training to improve RMET could result in better teamwork, whether for human-human or human-AI (artificial intelligence) in comp...
Main Authors: | Jacklin Hope Stonewall, Kaitlyn M Ouverson, Andrina Helgerson, Stephen B Gilbert, Michael C Dorneich |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267579 |
Similar Items
-
Age- and Sex-Specific Standard Scores for the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test
by: Jana Kynast, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Analysis of Communication, Team Situational Awareness, and Feedback in a Three-Person Intelligent Team Tutoring System
by: Kaitlyn M. Ouverson, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Sex and age interact in reading the mind in the eyes
by: Matthias L. Schroeter, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01) -
Structural neural substrates of reading the mind in the eyes
by: Wataru eSato, et al.
Published: (2016-04-01) -
Predictors of performance on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test.
by: Clare M Eddy, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)