Predicting Bystander Intention to Intervene: The Role of Gender-Specific System Justification and Rape Myth Acceptance for Men and Women
The relationship between rape myth acceptance, gender-specific system justification (GSJ), and bystander intention to intervene has often been studied on a one-dimensional basis, without separating the four dimensions of the acceptance of rape myths. The current study analyzes the relationship betwe...
Main Authors: | Mara Martini, Norma De Piccoli |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00326/full |
Similar Items
-
To Help or Not to Help: Intervening in Cyberbullying Among Chinese Cyber-Bystanders
by: Angel Nga Man Leung
Published: (2021-07-01) -
Development and validation of the Male Rape Myth Acceptance Scale (MRMAS)
by: Benjamin A. Hine, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Male Rape Myths: Understanding and Explaining Social Attitudes Surrounding Male Rape
by: Aliraza Javaid
Published: (2015-10-01) -
Understanding Rape Myth Acceptance: The Impact of Ambivalent Sexism and Conservatism in Surabaya
by: Adinda Dwi Wulandari, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01) -
The Effectiveness of the Bringing in the Bystander™ Program Among First-Year Students at a Religiously-Affiliated Liberal Arts College
by: Elizabeth M. Inman, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)