Comparison of the Impact of Conventional and Web-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Feasibility Study

BackgroundPulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) increases exercise capacity, with less clear evidence regarding physical activity (PA). The World Health Organization recommends at least 150-300 minutes of moderate-intensity or 75-150 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic PA per week...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emma Chaplin, Amy Barnes, Chris Newby, Linzy Houchen-Wolloff, Sally J Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2022-03-01
Series:JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
Online Access:https://rehab.jmir.org/2022/1/e28875
_version_ 1797735276405063680
author Emma Chaplin
Amy Barnes
Chris Newby
Linzy Houchen-Wolloff
Sally J Singh
author_facet Emma Chaplin
Amy Barnes
Chris Newby
Linzy Houchen-Wolloff
Sally J Singh
author_sort Emma Chaplin
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundPulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) increases exercise capacity, with less clear evidence regarding physical activity (PA). The World Health Organization recommends at least 150-300 minutes of moderate-intensity or 75-150 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic PA per week to reduce the risks of chronic disease. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of conventional PR versus web-based PR with respect to changes in PA. MethodsPatients with COPD were randomized to either conventional PR classes (n=51) or a web-based PR program (n=52) for 7 weeks in a feasibility study. Accelerometers (Sensewear) were worn before and after the intervention, and PA was measured as steps per day and mean bouts of moderate activity for ≥2, ≥5, ≥10, and ≥20 minutes. Measures were derived for patients with ≥8 hours of data per day for ≥4 days, using the R package for statistical analysis. Variables were explored to examine their relationships with bouts of activity. ResultsBaseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Complete PA data were available for the groups receiving web-based (n=20) and conventional (n=34) PR interventions. The web-based PR group demonstrated a nonsignificant increase in the number of steps per day, which mainly comprised short bouts of moderate to vigorous intensity PA when compared to the conventional PR group (P=.20). The conventional PR group demonstrated increased 20-minute bouts of PA by 49.1%, although this was not significant (P=.07). At baseline, age (r=–0.21, P=.04), BMI (r=–0.311, P=.004), and FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second; % predicted; r=–0.248, P=.048) were significantly correlated with 10-minute bouts of PA; however, this was not observed post intervention. ConclusionsThe analysis revealed a nonsignificant difference in the pattern of PA between groups receiving conventional vs web-based PR—the former being associated with an increase in 20-minute bouts, while the latter having demonstrated an increase in the number of steps per day. There appears to be a differing response emerging between the two interventions. Trial RegistrationInternational Clinical Trials Registry ISRCTN03142263; https://tinyurl.com/y4dmfyrb
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:56:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-98a7cd8f71824539815c7db44099d763
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2369-2529
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:56:41Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
spelling doaj.art-98a7cd8f71824539815c7db44099d7632023-08-28T21:02:41ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies2369-25292022-03-0191e2887510.2196/28875Comparison of the Impact of Conventional and Web-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Feasibility StudyEmma Chaplinhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0981-2980Amy Barneshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1656-6207Chris Newbyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2936-8592Linzy Houchen-Wolloffhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4940-8835Sally J Singhhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9834-0366 BackgroundPulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) increases exercise capacity, with less clear evidence regarding physical activity (PA). The World Health Organization recommends at least 150-300 minutes of moderate-intensity or 75-150 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic PA per week to reduce the risks of chronic disease. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of conventional PR versus web-based PR with respect to changes in PA. MethodsPatients with COPD were randomized to either conventional PR classes (n=51) or a web-based PR program (n=52) for 7 weeks in a feasibility study. Accelerometers (Sensewear) were worn before and after the intervention, and PA was measured as steps per day and mean bouts of moderate activity for ≥2, ≥5, ≥10, and ≥20 minutes. Measures were derived for patients with ≥8 hours of data per day for ≥4 days, using the R package for statistical analysis. Variables were explored to examine their relationships with bouts of activity. ResultsBaseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Complete PA data were available for the groups receiving web-based (n=20) and conventional (n=34) PR interventions. The web-based PR group demonstrated a nonsignificant increase in the number of steps per day, which mainly comprised short bouts of moderate to vigorous intensity PA when compared to the conventional PR group (P=.20). The conventional PR group demonstrated increased 20-minute bouts of PA by 49.1%, although this was not significant (P=.07). At baseline, age (r=–0.21, P=.04), BMI (r=–0.311, P=.004), and FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second; % predicted; r=–0.248, P=.048) were significantly correlated with 10-minute bouts of PA; however, this was not observed post intervention. ConclusionsThe analysis revealed a nonsignificant difference in the pattern of PA between groups receiving conventional vs web-based PR—the former being associated with an increase in 20-minute bouts, while the latter having demonstrated an increase in the number of steps per day. There appears to be a differing response emerging between the two interventions. Trial RegistrationInternational Clinical Trials Registry ISRCTN03142263; https://tinyurl.com/y4dmfyrbhttps://rehab.jmir.org/2022/1/e28875
spellingShingle Emma Chaplin
Amy Barnes
Chris Newby
Linzy Houchen-Wolloff
Sally J Singh
Comparison of the Impact of Conventional and Web-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Feasibility Study
JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
title Comparison of the Impact of Conventional and Web-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Feasibility Study
title_full Comparison of the Impact of Conventional and Web-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Comparison of the Impact of Conventional and Web-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Impact of Conventional and Web-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Feasibility Study
title_short Comparison of the Impact of Conventional and Web-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Feasibility Study
title_sort comparison of the impact of conventional and web based pulmonary rehabilitation on physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exploratory feasibility study
url https://rehab.jmir.org/2022/1/e28875
work_keys_str_mv AT emmachaplin comparisonoftheimpactofconventionalandwebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationonphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseexploratoryfeasibilitystudy
AT amybarnes comparisonoftheimpactofconventionalandwebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationonphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseexploratoryfeasibilitystudy
AT chrisnewby comparisonoftheimpactofconventionalandwebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationonphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseexploratoryfeasibilitystudy
AT linzyhouchenwolloff comparisonoftheimpactofconventionalandwebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationonphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseexploratoryfeasibilitystudy
AT sallyjsingh comparisonoftheimpactofconventionalandwebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationonphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseexploratoryfeasibilitystudy