Prosthesis-patient mismatch as a predictor of accelerated structural dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses

OBJECTIVE. Identification of predictors of dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses in the long-term period after surgical treatment.METHODS AND MATERIALS. We analyzed the completed treatment cases for the period from 2015 to 2020 and echocardiography data of 74 patients (42 men and 32 wome...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. G. Khubulava, Z. O. Maliev, N. N. Shikhverdiev, A. I. Lyubimov, D. I. Ushakov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University 2022-09-01
Series:Вестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.vestnik-grekova.ru/jour/article/view/1997
_version_ 1826962504636432384
author G. G. Khubulava
Z. O. Maliev
N. N. Shikhverdiev
A. I. Lyubimov
D. I. Ushakov
author_facet G. G. Khubulava
Z. O. Maliev
N. N. Shikhverdiev
A. I. Lyubimov
D. I. Ushakov
author_sort G. G. Khubulava
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVE. Identification of predictors of dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses in the long-term period after surgical treatment.METHODS AND MATERIALS. We analyzed the completed treatment cases for the period from 2015 to 2020 and echocardiography data of 74 patients (42 men and 32 women) with an average age of 67.0±4.2 years with bioprostheses implanted in the aortic position. The average follow-up period was 4 years. The transaortic flow velocity, the average and peak transvalvular gradients, the area of the effective opening of the prosthesis, the myocardium mass index, the thickness and mobility of the cusp of the biovalve were evaluated. The presence of the pronounced PPM in a patient was determined at iEOA values less than 0.65 cm2/m2, moderate - at values from 0.65 to 0.85 cm2/m2, mild - up to 0.85 cm2/m2.RESULTS. PPM was recorded in 27% of cases. Structural dysfunction was observed in 12.5% of cases, it mainly included stenosis of the bioprosthesis (10%). In 2.5% of cases, reintervention was performed for severe stenosis of the AV bioprosthesis. During the multifactorial analysis, we revealed that PPM was a predictor of the development of structural dysfunction of aortic valve bioprostheses in the long-term period after surgery (p<0.005).
first_indexed 2024-04-10T02:19:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-98ab19eda8054483b238dc4bb544561b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0042-4625
language Russian
last_indexed 2025-02-18T02:15:51Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
record_format Article
series Вестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова
spelling doaj.art-98ab19eda8054483b238dc4bb544561b2024-11-26T10:43:56ZrusPavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical UniversityВестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова0042-46252022-09-011811212610.24884/0042-4625-2022-181-1-21-261383Prosthesis-patient mismatch as a predictor of accelerated structural dysfunction of biological aortic valve prosthesesG. G. Khubulava0Z. O. Maliev1N. N. Shikhverdiev2A. I. Lyubimov3D. I. Ushakov4Military Medical AcademyMilitary Medical AcademyMilitary Medical AcademyMilitary Medical AcademyMilitary Medical AcademyOBJECTIVE. Identification of predictors of dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses in the long-term period after surgical treatment.METHODS AND MATERIALS. We analyzed the completed treatment cases for the period from 2015 to 2020 and echocardiography data of 74 patients (42 men and 32 women) with an average age of 67.0±4.2 years with bioprostheses implanted in the aortic position. The average follow-up period was 4 years. The transaortic flow velocity, the average and peak transvalvular gradients, the area of the effective opening of the prosthesis, the myocardium mass index, the thickness and mobility of the cusp of the biovalve were evaluated. The presence of the pronounced PPM in a patient was determined at iEOA values less than 0.65 cm2/m2, moderate - at values from 0.65 to 0.85 cm2/m2, mild - up to 0.85 cm2/m2.RESULTS. PPM was recorded in 27% of cases. Structural dysfunction was observed in 12.5% of cases, it mainly included stenosis of the bioprosthesis (10%). In 2.5% of cases, reintervention was performed for severe stenosis of the AV bioprosthesis. During the multifactorial analysis, we revealed that PPM was a predictor of the development of structural dysfunction of aortic valve bioprostheses in the long-term period after surgery (p<0.005).https://www.vestnik-grekova.ru/jour/article/view/1997prosthesis-patient mismatchaortic valvebioprosthesiscardiac surgerycalcification
spellingShingle G. G. Khubulava
Z. O. Maliev
N. N. Shikhverdiev
A. I. Lyubimov
D. I. Ushakov
Prosthesis-patient mismatch as a predictor of accelerated structural dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses
Вестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова
prosthesis-patient mismatch
aortic valve
bioprosthesis
cardiac surgery
calcification
title Prosthesis-patient mismatch as a predictor of accelerated structural dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses
title_full Prosthesis-patient mismatch as a predictor of accelerated structural dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses
title_fullStr Prosthesis-patient mismatch as a predictor of accelerated structural dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses
title_full_unstemmed Prosthesis-patient mismatch as a predictor of accelerated structural dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses
title_short Prosthesis-patient mismatch as a predictor of accelerated structural dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses
title_sort prosthesis patient mismatch as a predictor of accelerated structural dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses
topic prosthesis-patient mismatch
aortic valve
bioprosthesis
cardiac surgery
calcification
url https://www.vestnik-grekova.ru/jour/article/view/1997
work_keys_str_mv AT ggkhubulava prosthesispatientmismatchasapredictorofacceleratedstructuraldysfunctionofbiologicalaorticvalveprostheses
AT zomaliev prosthesispatientmismatchasapredictorofacceleratedstructuraldysfunctionofbiologicalaorticvalveprostheses
AT nnshikhverdiev prosthesispatientmismatchasapredictorofacceleratedstructuraldysfunctionofbiologicalaorticvalveprostheses
AT ailyubimov prosthesispatientmismatchasapredictorofacceleratedstructuraldysfunctionofbiologicalaorticvalveprostheses
AT diushakov prosthesispatientmismatchasapredictorofacceleratedstructuraldysfunctionofbiologicalaorticvalveprostheses