Buying better biosecurity: Plant‐buying behaviour and the implications for an accreditation scheme in the horticultural sector

Societal Impact Statement The horticultural trade relies on healthy plants to flourish. However, its very nature means that it is also a key pathway for the introduction and spread of plant pests and diseases. These pests and diseases threaten horticultural stakeholders, and can also cause huge ecol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mike Dunn, Mariella Marzano, Jack Forster
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-05-01
Series:Plants, People, Planet
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10076
_version_ 1818334419832799232
author Mike Dunn
Mariella Marzano
Jack Forster
author_facet Mike Dunn
Mariella Marzano
Jack Forster
author_sort Mike Dunn
collection DOAJ
description Societal Impact Statement The horticultural trade relies on healthy plants to flourish. However, its very nature means that it is also a key pathway for the introduction and spread of plant pests and diseases. These pests and diseases threaten horticultural stakeholders, and can also cause huge ecological and economic damage. A horticultural sector accreditation scheme, underpinned by best biosecurity practice, could help reduce these threats. Drawing on survey responses, this study examines the plant‐buying habits of UK consumers and their appetite for a horticulture accreditation scheme. We consider the necessary scope of such a scheme and outline how it could be made appealing to the plant‐buying public. Summary Movement of live plant material through the horticultural trade is a recurrent pathway for the introduction and spread of pests and diseases. An accreditation scheme underpinned by best biosecurity practice represents one approach to mitigating this risk. This research aims to determine whether an accreditation scheme would likely be supported by the public in the United Kingdom—a factor which would heavily influence its establishment and impact. Consumer attitudes and behaviours were elicited through a survey of the UK's plant‐buying public (n = 1,500). The survey explored awareness of pests and diseases, the importance of biosecurity when making plant‐buying decisions (relative to other factors), and appetite for accredited products, including plants. The sample exhibited limited awareness of plant pests and diseases and ascribed little importance to biosecurity during plant‐buying decisions. Instead, these decisions are influenced by “quality”—a factor also cited to explain consumers’ selection of (non‐horticultural) accredited goods over unaccredited varieties. Despite apparent support of a horticultural accreditation scheme's ideals, consumers expressed concern that accreditation could lead to more expensive products. Public support for a scheme aiming to safeguard the wider environment from pests and diseases is unlikely to materialize without dedicated efforts to raise awareness by key influencers such as retailers. However, an assurance of high‐quality, healthy plants would increase a scheme's appeal. Furthermore, given the diversity of sources from which plants are obtained, any would‐be scheme must encompass a range of growers and sellers if it is to be widely considered by the plant‐buying public.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T14:07:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-98b125694eec4cd88d469dda79e21ed7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2572-2611
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T14:07:14Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Plants, People, Planet
spelling doaj.art-98b125694eec4cd88d469dda79e21ed72022-12-21T23:42:34ZengWileyPlants, People, Planet2572-26112020-05-012325926810.1002/ppp3.10076Buying better biosecurity: Plant‐buying behaviour and the implications for an accreditation scheme in the horticultural sectorMike Dunn0Mariella Marzano1Jack Forster2Forest Research Northern Research Station Roslin UKForest Research Northern Research Station Roslin UKForest Research Alice Holt Lodge Wrecclesham UKSocietal Impact Statement The horticultural trade relies on healthy plants to flourish. However, its very nature means that it is also a key pathway for the introduction and spread of plant pests and diseases. These pests and diseases threaten horticultural stakeholders, and can also cause huge ecological and economic damage. A horticultural sector accreditation scheme, underpinned by best biosecurity practice, could help reduce these threats. Drawing on survey responses, this study examines the plant‐buying habits of UK consumers and their appetite for a horticulture accreditation scheme. We consider the necessary scope of such a scheme and outline how it could be made appealing to the plant‐buying public. Summary Movement of live plant material through the horticultural trade is a recurrent pathway for the introduction and spread of pests and diseases. An accreditation scheme underpinned by best biosecurity practice represents one approach to mitigating this risk. This research aims to determine whether an accreditation scheme would likely be supported by the public in the United Kingdom—a factor which would heavily influence its establishment and impact. Consumer attitudes and behaviours were elicited through a survey of the UK's plant‐buying public (n = 1,500). The survey explored awareness of pests and diseases, the importance of biosecurity when making plant‐buying decisions (relative to other factors), and appetite for accredited products, including plants. The sample exhibited limited awareness of plant pests and diseases and ascribed little importance to biosecurity during plant‐buying decisions. Instead, these decisions are influenced by “quality”—a factor also cited to explain consumers’ selection of (non‐horticultural) accredited goods over unaccredited varieties. Despite apparent support of a horticultural accreditation scheme's ideals, consumers expressed concern that accreditation could lead to more expensive products. Public support for a scheme aiming to safeguard the wider environment from pests and diseases is unlikely to materialize without dedicated efforts to raise awareness by key influencers such as retailers. However, an assurance of high‐quality, healthy plants would increase a scheme's appeal. Furthermore, given the diversity of sources from which plants are obtained, any would‐be scheme must encompass a range of growers and sellers if it is to be widely considered by the plant‐buying public.https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10076accreditationbiosecurityconsumerhorticultureplant health
spellingShingle Mike Dunn
Mariella Marzano
Jack Forster
Buying better biosecurity: Plant‐buying behaviour and the implications for an accreditation scheme in the horticultural sector
Plants, People, Planet
accreditation
biosecurity
consumer
horticulture
plant health
title Buying better biosecurity: Plant‐buying behaviour and the implications for an accreditation scheme in the horticultural sector
title_full Buying better biosecurity: Plant‐buying behaviour and the implications for an accreditation scheme in the horticultural sector
title_fullStr Buying better biosecurity: Plant‐buying behaviour and the implications for an accreditation scheme in the horticultural sector
title_full_unstemmed Buying better biosecurity: Plant‐buying behaviour and the implications for an accreditation scheme in the horticultural sector
title_short Buying better biosecurity: Plant‐buying behaviour and the implications for an accreditation scheme in the horticultural sector
title_sort buying better biosecurity plant buying behaviour and the implications for an accreditation scheme in the horticultural sector
topic accreditation
biosecurity
consumer
horticulture
plant health
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10076
work_keys_str_mv AT mikedunn buyingbetterbiosecurityplantbuyingbehaviourandtheimplicationsforanaccreditationschemeinthehorticulturalsector
AT mariellamarzano buyingbetterbiosecurityplantbuyingbehaviourandtheimplicationsforanaccreditationschemeinthehorticulturalsector
AT jackforster buyingbetterbiosecurityplantbuyingbehaviourandtheimplicationsforanaccreditationschemeinthehorticulturalsector