Source attribution and process analysis for atmospheric mercury in eastern China simulated by CMAQ-Hg

The contribution from different emission sources and atmospheric processes to gaseous elemental mercury (GEM), gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM), particulate bound mercury (PBM) and mercury deposition in eastern China were quantified using the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ-Hg) modeling system...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Zhu, T. Wang, J. Bieser, V. Matthias
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-08-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/8767/2015/acp-15-8767-2015.pdf
_version_ 1818550348252446720
author J. Zhu
T. Wang
J. Bieser
V. Matthias
author_facet J. Zhu
T. Wang
J. Bieser
V. Matthias
author_sort J. Zhu
collection DOAJ
description The contribution from different emission sources and atmospheric processes to gaseous elemental mercury (GEM), gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM), particulate bound mercury (PBM) and mercury deposition in eastern China were quantified using the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ-Hg) modeling system run with a nested domain. Natural sources (NAT) and six categories of anthropogenic mercury sources (ANTH) including cement production (CEM), domestic life (DOM), industrial boilers (IND), metal production (MET), coal-fired power plants (PP) and traffic (TRA) were considered for source apportionment. NAT were responsible for 36.6 % of annual averaged GEM concentration, which was regarded as the most important source for GEM in spite of obvious seasonal variation. Among ANTH, the influence of MET and PP on GEM were most evident especially in winter. ANTH dominated the variations of GOM and PBM concentrations with contributions of 86.7 and 79.1 %, respectively. Among ANTH, IND were the largest contributor for GOM (57.5 %) and PBM (34.4 %) so that most mercury deposition came from IND. The effect of mercury emitted from out of China was indicated by a > 30 % contribution to GEM concentration and wet deposition. The contributions from nine processes – consisting of emissions (EMIS), gas-phase chemical production/loss (CHEM), horizontal advection (HADV), vertical advection (ZADV), horizontal advection (HDIF), vertical diffusion (VDIF), dry deposition (DDEP), cloud processes (CLDS) and aerosol processes (AERO) – were calculated for process analysis with their comparison in urban and non-urban regions of the Yangtze River delta (YRD). EMIS and VDIF affected surface GEM and PBM concentrations most and tended to compensate each other all the time in both urban and non-urban areas. However, DDEP was the most important removal process for GOM with 7.3 and 2.9 ng m<sup>−3</sup> reduced in the surface of urban and non-urban areas, respectively, in 1 day. The diurnal profile variation of processes revealed the transportation of GOM from urban area to non-urban areas and the importance of CHEM/AERO in higher altitudes which partly caused diffusion of GOM downwards to non-urban areas. Most of the anthropogenic mercury was transported and diffused away from urban areas by HADV and VDIF and increased mercury concentrations in non-urban areas by HADV. Natural emissions only influenced CHEM and AERO more significantly than anthropogenic. Local emissions in the YRD contributed 8.5 % more to GEM and ~ 30 % more to GOM and PBM in urban areas compared to non-urban areas.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T08:45:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-98b8760b42ef4ac59b3c62cb6c379008
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T08:45:15Z
publishDate 2015-08-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-98b8760b42ef4ac59b3c62cb6c3790082022-12-22T00:30:34ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242015-08-0115158767877910.5194/acp-15-8767-2015Source attribution and process analysis for atmospheric mercury in eastern China simulated by CMAQ-HgJ. Zhu0T. Wang1J. Bieser2V. Matthias3School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, ChinaSchool of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, ChinaInstitute of Coastal Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Max-Planck-Str. 1, 21502, Geesthacht, GermanyInstitute of Coastal Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Max-Planck-Str. 1, 21502, Geesthacht, GermanyThe contribution from different emission sources and atmospheric processes to gaseous elemental mercury (GEM), gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM), particulate bound mercury (PBM) and mercury deposition in eastern China were quantified using the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ-Hg) modeling system run with a nested domain. Natural sources (NAT) and six categories of anthropogenic mercury sources (ANTH) including cement production (CEM), domestic life (DOM), industrial boilers (IND), metal production (MET), coal-fired power plants (PP) and traffic (TRA) were considered for source apportionment. NAT were responsible for 36.6 % of annual averaged GEM concentration, which was regarded as the most important source for GEM in spite of obvious seasonal variation. Among ANTH, the influence of MET and PP on GEM were most evident especially in winter. ANTH dominated the variations of GOM and PBM concentrations with contributions of 86.7 and 79.1 %, respectively. Among ANTH, IND were the largest contributor for GOM (57.5 %) and PBM (34.4 %) so that most mercury deposition came from IND. The effect of mercury emitted from out of China was indicated by a > 30 % contribution to GEM concentration and wet deposition. The contributions from nine processes – consisting of emissions (EMIS), gas-phase chemical production/loss (CHEM), horizontal advection (HADV), vertical advection (ZADV), horizontal advection (HDIF), vertical diffusion (VDIF), dry deposition (DDEP), cloud processes (CLDS) and aerosol processes (AERO) – were calculated for process analysis with their comparison in urban and non-urban regions of the Yangtze River delta (YRD). EMIS and VDIF affected surface GEM and PBM concentrations most and tended to compensate each other all the time in both urban and non-urban areas. However, DDEP was the most important removal process for GOM with 7.3 and 2.9 ng m<sup>−3</sup> reduced in the surface of urban and non-urban areas, respectively, in 1 day. The diurnal profile variation of processes revealed the transportation of GOM from urban area to non-urban areas and the importance of CHEM/AERO in higher altitudes which partly caused diffusion of GOM downwards to non-urban areas. Most of the anthropogenic mercury was transported and diffused away from urban areas by HADV and VDIF and increased mercury concentrations in non-urban areas by HADV. Natural emissions only influenced CHEM and AERO more significantly than anthropogenic. Local emissions in the YRD contributed 8.5 % more to GEM and ~ 30 % more to GOM and PBM in urban areas compared to non-urban areas.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/8767/2015/acp-15-8767-2015.pdf
spellingShingle J. Zhu
T. Wang
J. Bieser
V. Matthias
Source attribution and process analysis for atmospheric mercury in eastern China simulated by CMAQ-Hg
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Source attribution and process analysis for atmospheric mercury in eastern China simulated by CMAQ-Hg
title_full Source attribution and process analysis for atmospheric mercury in eastern China simulated by CMAQ-Hg
title_fullStr Source attribution and process analysis for atmospheric mercury in eastern China simulated by CMAQ-Hg
title_full_unstemmed Source attribution and process analysis for atmospheric mercury in eastern China simulated by CMAQ-Hg
title_short Source attribution and process analysis for atmospheric mercury in eastern China simulated by CMAQ-Hg
title_sort source attribution and process analysis for atmospheric mercury in eastern china simulated by cmaq hg
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/8767/2015/acp-15-8767-2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jzhu sourceattributionandprocessanalysisforatmosphericmercuryineasternchinasimulatedbycmaqhg
AT twang sourceattributionandprocessanalysisforatmosphericmercuryineasternchinasimulatedbycmaqhg
AT jbieser sourceattributionandprocessanalysisforatmosphericmercuryineasternchinasimulatedbycmaqhg
AT vmatthias sourceattributionandprocessanalysisforatmosphericmercuryineasternchinasimulatedbycmaqhg