Railway underpass location affects migration distance in Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii).

Wildlife crossings are designed to mitigate barrier effects of transportation infrastructure on wildlife movement. Most efforts in evaluating crossing efficiency focus on counting animal use. However, crossings placed at suboptimal locations may alter animals' natural movement pattern and decre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wenjing Xu, Qiongyu Huang, Jared Stabach, Hoshino Buho, Peter Leimgruber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211798
_version_ 1819115126363521024
author Wenjing Xu
Qiongyu Huang
Jared Stabach
Hoshino Buho
Peter Leimgruber
author_facet Wenjing Xu
Qiongyu Huang
Jared Stabach
Hoshino Buho
Peter Leimgruber
author_sort Wenjing Xu
collection DOAJ
description Wildlife crossings are designed to mitigate barrier effects of transportation infrastructure on wildlife movement. Most efforts in evaluating crossing efficiency focus on counting animal use. However, crossings placed at suboptimal locations may alter animals' natural movement pattern and decrease population fitness, which cannot be reflected solely by counts of animal use. The long-distance migration of Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii) is directly affected by the Qinghai-Tibet Railway (QTR). Using the Wubei wildlife underpass along the QTR, we evaluated how underpass placement affects migration routes and decreases movement efficiency. We calculated the net-squared displacement of each animal to identify migration segments (wintering, calving, and migrating) based on Argos tracking data. We used two corridor modeling methods to identify optimal routes that theoretically require less energy to travel between seasonal habitats. We calculated the distance from actual migration routes recorded by Argos to the modelled optimal routes. We found that antelopes stray farther away from the optimal routes as they approach Wubei, indicating that animals have to deviate from their optimal migration pathway to access the railway underpass. On average, antelopes prolong their migration distance by 86.19 km (SEM = 17.29 km) in order to access the underpass. Our study suggests crossing location can affect animal migrations even if structures facilitate animal crossing. To better conserve long-distance migrations, long-term studies using tracking data which evaluate optimal migration routes are needed. We suggest considering the location and structural characteristics in designing and improving wildlife crossings, which do not only facilitate utilization, but also optimize animal movement processes such as migration.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T04:56:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-98c5b5d1f65b421fa1fc408b22d04d97
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T04:56:14Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-98c5b5d1f65b421fa1fc408b22d04d972022-12-21T18:38:22ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01142e021179810.1371/journal.pone.0211798Railway underpass location affects migration distance in Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii).Wenjing XuQiongyu HuangJared StabachHoshino BuhoPeter LeimgruberWildlife crossings are designed to mitigate barrier effects of transportation infrastructure on wildlife movement. Most efforts in evaluating crossing efficiency focus on counting animal use. However, crossings placed at suboptimal locations may alter animals' natural movement pattern and decrease population fitness, which cannot be reflected solely by counts of animal use. The long-distance migration of Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii) is directly affected by the Qinghai-Tibet Railway (QTR). Using the Wubei wildlife underpass along the QTR, we evaluated how underpass placement affects migration routes and decreases movement efficiency. We calculated the net-squared displacement of each animal to identify migration segments (wintering, calving, and migrating) based on Argos tracking data. We used two corridor modeling methods to identify optimal routes that theoretically require less energy to travel between seasonal habitats. We calculated the distance from actual migration routes recorded by Argos to the modelled optimal routes. We found that antelopes stray farther away from the optimal routes as they approach Wubei, indicating that animals have to deviate from their optimal migration pathway to access the railway underpass. On average, antelopes prolong their migration distance by 86.19 km (SEM = 17.29 km) in order to access the underpass. Our study suggests crossing location can affect animal migrations even if structures facilitate animal crossing. To better conserve long-distance migrations, long-term studies using tracking data which evaluate optimal migration routes are needed. We suggest considering the location and structural characteristics in designing and improving wildlife crossings, which do not only facilitate utilization, but also optimize animal movement processes such as migration.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211798
spellingShingle Wenjing Xu
Qiongyu Huang
Jared Stabach
Hoshino Buho
Peter Leimgruber
Railway underpass location affects migration distance in Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii).
PLoS ONE
title Railway underpass location affects migration distance in Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii).
title_full Railway underpass location affects migration distance in Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii).
title_fullStr Railway underpass location affects migration distance in Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii).
title_full_unstemmed Railway underpass location affects migration distance in Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii).
title_short Railway underpass location affects migration distance in Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii).
title_sort railway underpass location affects migration distance in tibetan antelope pantholops hodgsonii
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211798
work_keys_str_mv AT wenjingxu railwayunderpasslocationaffectsmigrationdistanceintibetanantelopepantholopshodgsonii
AT qiongyuhuang railwayunderpasslocationaffectsmigrationdistanceintibetanantelopepantholopshodgsonii
AT jaredstabach railwayunderpasslocationaffectsmigrationdistanceintibetanantelopepantholopshodgsonii
AT hoshinobuho railwayunderpasslocationaffectsmigrationdistanceintibetanantelopepantholopshodgsonii
AT peterleimgruber railwayunderpasslocationaffectsmigrationdistanceintibetanantelopepantholopshodgsonii