Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
Abstract Background Misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor has been recently reported to be superior to dinoprostone vaginal insert in a phase III trial, but has never been compared to vaginal misoprostol in another galenic form. The aim of this study was to compare misoprostol vaginal in...
Main Authors: | Daniele Bolla, Saskia Vanessa Weissleder, Anda-Petronela Radan, Maria Luisa Gasparri, Luigi Raio, Martin Müller, Daniel Surbek |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-05-01
|
Series: | BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-018-1788-z |
Similar Items
-
Is Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Safe for the Induction of Labor in High-Risk Pregnancy Obese Women?
by: Valentin Nicolae Varlas, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
The Efficacy of Vaginal Misoprostol in Treatment of Missed Abortions
by: M Tabatabaei, et al.
Published: (2005-07-01) -
Effectiveness and safety of vaginal versus sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: A randomized controlled trial
by: Rasmus I Okonkwo, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Vaginal Versus Oral Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Termination: A Randomized Trial
by: Sh Aghdaee, et al.
Published: (2008-10-01) -
Vaginal Misoprostol in Early Pregnancy Failure
by: Suguna R.Kumar, et al.
Published: (2010-07-01)