Consistency and Sensitivity Evaluation of the Saudi Arabia Mental Health Surveillance System (MHSS): Hypothesis Generation and Testing

BackgroundPublic health surveillance systems should be evaluated periodically, and the evaluation should include recommendations for improving the system’s quality and efficiency. Each surveillance system may have a unique situation in which evaluating its quality depends on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nora A Althumiri, Mada H Basyouni, Nasser F BinDhim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2022-02-01
Series:JMIR Formative Research
Online Access:https://formative.jmir.org/2022/2/e23965
_version_ 1827858687381733376
author Nora A Althumiri
Mada H Basyouni
Nasser F BinDhim
author_facet Nora A Althumiri
Mada H Basyouni
Nasser F BinDhim
author_sort Nora A Althumiri
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundPublic health surveillance systems should be evaluated periodically, and the evaluation should include recommendations for improving the system’s quality and efficiency. Each surveillance system may have a unique situation in which evaluating its quality depends on its methodology, aims, and other factors, such as the frequency of repeating the survey in the case of survey-based surveillance. ObjectiveAs the consistency of the surveillance system to capture demographic data and its sensitivity to monitor the intended health-related event are important indicators of the quality of the surveillance system, the aim of this article is to evaluate the Saudi Arabia Mental Health Surveillance System (MHSS) in terms of consistency and sensitivity via the scientific hypothesis testing process. MethodsThe quality of the MHSS was assessed by examining (1) the consistency of the main demographic variables and (2) the sensitivity to changes in score between the 2 mental health screening tools used in the MHSS and between the 3 waves collected in 3 consecutive months. The assessment uses all data collected via the MHSS between May 2020 and July 2020. The first null hypothesis predicted there were differences between the distributions of the demographic variables between the 3 waves. The second predicted there were no differences between the scores of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) between the 3 waves. ResultsIn terms of sampling variables (age, gender, and region), there were no significant differences between the 3 waves in age, using one-way ANOVA, nor in gender and region, using the chi-square test. In addition, there were no significant differences between the 3 waves in all other demographic variables, except in the income variable. However, in terms of the PHQ-9 score, the one-way ANOVA (F2,12334=8.05; P<.001) showed significant differences between waves. Similarly, significant differences between waves were found in the GAD-7 score (F2,12334=7.09; P=.001). ConclusionsThe MHSS showed a consistent distribution of the sample demographic variables, while being sensitive to the changes in mental health scores across waves. The MHSS can generate an acceptable level of consistency and sensitivity to monitor mental health trends. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR2-10.2196/23748
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:57:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-98e8fc3c58a146a8b1441b1c7b43da37
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2561-326X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:57:42Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Formative Research
spelling doaj.art-98e8fc3c58a146a8b1441b1c7b43da372023-08-28T20:42:42ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Formative Research2561-326X2022-02-0162e2396510.2196/23965Consistency and Sensitivity Evaluation of the Saudi Arabia Mental Health Surveillance System (MHSS): Hypothesis Generation and TestingNora A Althumirihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8215-6097Mada H Basyounihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8905-8641Nasser F BinDhimhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8117-1044 BackgroundPublic health surveillance systems should be evaluated periodically, and the evaluation should include recommendations for improving the system’s quality and efficiency. Each surveillance system may have a unique situation in which evaluating its quality depends on its methodology, aims, and other factors, such as the frequency of repeating the survey in the case of survey-based surveillance. ObjectiveAs the consistency of the surveillance system to capture demographic data and its sensitivity to monitor the intended health-related event are important indicators of the quality of the surveillance system, the aim of this article is to evaluate the Saudi Arabia Mental Health Surveillance System (MHSS) in terms of consistency and sensitivity via the scientific hypothesis testing process. MethodsThe quality of the MHSS was assessed by examining (1) the consistency of the main demographic variables and (2) the sensitivity to changes in score between the 2 mental health screening tools used in the MHSS and between the 3 waves collected in 3 consecutive months. The assessment uses all data collected via the MHSS between May 2020 and July 2020. The first null hypothesis predicted there were differences between the distributions of the demographic variables between the 3 waves. The second predicted there were no differences between the scores of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) between the 3 waves. ResultsIn terms of sampling variables (age, gender, and region), there were no significant differences between the 3 waves in age, using one-way ANOVA, nor in gender and region, using the chi-square test. In addition, there were no significant differences between the 3 waves in all other demographic variables, except in the income variable. However, in terms of the PHQ-9 score, the one-way ANOVA (F2,12334=8.05; P<.001) showed significant differences between waves. Similarly, significant differences between waves were found in the GAD-7 score (F2,12334=7.09; P=.001). ConclusionsThe MHSS showed a consistent distribution of the sample demographic variables, while being sensitive to the changes in mental health scores across waves. The MHSS can generate an acceptable level of consistency and sensitivity to monitor mental health trends. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR2-10.2196/23748https://formative.jmir.org/2022/2/e23965
spellingShingle Nora A Althumiri
Mada H Basyouni
Nasser F BinDhim
Consistency and Sensitivity Evaluation of the Saudi Arabia Mental Health Surveillance System (MHSS): Hypothesis Generation and Testing
JMIR Formative Research
title Consistency and Sensitivity Evaluation of the Saudi Arabia Mental Health Surveillance System (MHSS): Hypothesis Generation and Testing
title_full Consistency and Sensitivity Evaluation of the Saudi Arabia Mental Health Surveillance System (MHSS): Hypothesis Generation and Testing
title_fullStr Consistency and Sensitivity Evaluation of the Saudi Arabia Mental Health Surveillance System (MHSS): Hypothesis Generation and Testing
title_full_unstemmed Consistency and Sensitivity Evaluation of the Saudi Arabia Mental Health Surveillance System (MHSS): Hypothesis Generation and Testing
title_short Consistency and Sensitivity Evaluation of the Saudi Arabia Mental Health Surveillance System (MHSS): Hypothesis Generation and Testing
title_sort consistency and sensitivity evaluation of the saudi arabia mental health surveillance system mhss hypothesis generation and testing
url https://formative.jmir.org/2022/2/e23965
work_keys_str_mv AT noraaalthumiri consistencyandsensitivityevaluationofthesaudiarabiamentalhealthsurveillancesystemmhsshypothesisgenerationandtesting
AT madahbasyouni consistencyandsensitivityevaluationofthesaudiarabiamentalhealthsurveillancesystemmhsshypothesisgenerationandtesting
AT nasserfbindhim consistencyandsensitivityevaluationofthesaudiarabiamentalhealthsurveillancesystemmhsshypothesisgenerationandtesting