Judgement powers in administration activity and in Administration Court supervision

In France, as in many European countries, there is a distinction between related authority and discretion of administration powers which affords more or less wide powers of evaluation of facts. The judge can, or rather, cannot supervise that evaluation of facts and module the breadth of its supervis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniel Giltard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu 2015-01-01
Series:Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/203572
_version_ 1797427120179249152
author Daniel Giltard
author_facet Daniel Giltard
author_sort Daniel Giltard
collection DOAJ
description In France, as in many European countries, there is a distinction between related authority and discretion of administration powers which affords more or less wide powers of evaluation of facts. The judge can, or rather, cannot supervise that evaluation of facts and module the breadth of its supervision. A century ago, the French administration court included factual questions on its supervision and legality in such a way that it controlled the legal qualification of facts which motivated a certain judgement. That supervision of motives remains important, but over time, it is complemented with control of its adaptation, appropriacy of significance, and proportionality with the factual reality.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T08:40:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-98ecda57fffb493f97006510bfce2970
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0584-9063
1847-0459
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T08:40:05Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu
record_format Article
series Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu
spelling doaj.art-98ecda57fffb493f97006510bfce29702023-12-02T17:07:30ZengPravni fakultet Sveučilišta u SplituZbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu0584-90631847-04592015-01-015211124Judgement powers in administration activity and in Administration Court supervisionDaniel GiltardIn France, as in many European countries, there is a distinction between related authority and discretion of administration powers which affords more or less wide powers of evaluation of facts. The judge can, or rather, cannot supervise that evaluation of facts and module the breadth of its supervision. A century ago, the French administration court included factual questions on its supervision and legality in such a way that it controlled the legal qualification of facts which motivated a certain judgement. That supervision of motives remains important, but over time, it is complemented with control of its adaptation, appropriacy of significance, and proportionality with the factual reality.http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/203572administrative judgeauthority of diseretionevaluation of facts
spellingShingle Daniel Giltard
Judgement powers in administration activity and in Administration Court supervision
Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu
administrative judge
authority of diseretion
evaluation of facts
title Judgement powers in administration activity and in Administration Court supervision
title_full Judgement powers in administration activity and in Administration Court supervision
title_fullStr Judgement powers in administration activity and in Administration Court supervision
title_full_unstemmed Judgement powers in administration activity and in Administration Court supervision
title_short Judgement powers in administration activity and in Administration Court supervision
title_sort judgement powers in administration activity and in administration court supervision
topic administrative judge
authority of diseretion
evaluation of facts
url http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/203572
work_keys_str_mv AT danielgiltard judgementpowersinadministrationactivityandinadministrationcourtsupervision