Repeated intravenous thrombolysis in recurrent ischemic stroke within 3 months: a systematic review

Abstract Background Repeated intravenous thrombolysis (RIVT) within 3 months is an off-guideline therapy, however, may be an effective and safe way to treat early recurrent ischemic stroke. This study was conducted to assess the potential influencing factors on the efficacy and safety of RIVT in rec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Si-Yuan Wen, Fei-Fei Chen, Xiang-Ting Chen, Qian Zhang, Chang-Qing Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-11-01
Series:BMC Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03472-4
_version_ 1797414807395106816
author Si-Yuan Wen
Fei-Fei Chen
Xiang-Ting Chen
Qian Zhang
Chang-Qing Zhou
author_facet Si-Yuan Wen
Fei-Fei Chen
Xiang-Ting Chen
Qian Zhang
Chang-Qing Zhou
author_sort Si-Yuan Wen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Repeated intravenous thrombolysis (RIVT) within 3 months is an off-guideline therapy, however, may be an effective and safe way to treat early recurrent ischemic stroke. This study was conducted to assess the potential influencing factors on the efficacy and safety of RIVT in recurrent ischemic stroke within 3 months and to explore the strategy of RIVT within 3 months. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Database were searched for cases of RIVT in recurrent ischemic stroke within 3 months up to February 1, 2023. Clinical characteristics were compared and analyzed between the good-outcome and poor-outcome groups and between the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and non-sICH groups respectively. Results A total of 16 studies including 24 cases of RIVT within 3 months were retrospectively analyzed in the present study. The patients’ ages ranged from 42 to 87 years (median 73.5 years) and the intervals between thrombolysis were from 0.25 to 90 days (median 9.5 days). Comparing the clinical characteristics between the good-outcome group and the poor-outcome group, no statistically significant differences were found (P > 0.05), but the differences in baseline National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score of the recurrent stroke (P = 0.056) and good outcome after the previous IVT (P = 0.054) nearly reached statistical significance. Comparing the data between the non-sICH group and the sICH group, statistically significant differences were found in terms of the proportion of cardiogenic embolism (P = 0.036), baseline NIHSS score in the recurrent stroke (P = 0.007) and the interval between thrombolysis (P = 0.041), but no significant difference was found by regression analysis. Conclusion In patients with recurrent ischemic stroke within 3 months, those with a good outcome after the previous IVT and a low baseline NIHSS score in the recurrent stroke may be considered for RIVT, whereas those with a high baseline NIHSS score, a short interval between thrombolysis, and cardiogenic embolism may suffer a higher risk of sICH. Due to sample size and publication bias, more studies with larger sample sizes and more rigorous designs are needed to confirm this conclusion.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T05:39:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-99082c41c3264465a82ffc9fea791185
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2377
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T05:39:09Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Neurology
spelling doaj.art-99082c41c3264465a82ffc9fea7911852023-12-03T12:26:51ZengBMCBMC Neurology1471-23772023-11-012311910.1186/s12883-023-03472-4Repeated intravenous thrombolysis in recurrent ischemic stroke within 3 months: a systematic reviewSi-Yuan Wen0Fei-Fei Chen1Xiang-Ting Chen2Qian Zhang3Chang-Qing Zhou4Department of Neurology, Bishan Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityDepartment of Neurology, Bishan Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityDepartment of Neurology, Bishan Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityDepartment of Neurology, Bishan Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityDepartment of Neurology, Bishan Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityAbstract Background Repeated intravenous thrombolysis (RIVT) within 3 months is an off-guideline therapy, however, may be an effective and safe way to treat early recurrent ischemic stroke. This study was conducted to assess the potential influencing factors on the efficacy and safety of RIVT in recurrent ischemic stroke within 3 months and to explore the strategy of RIVT within 3 months. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Database were searched for cases of RIVT in recurrent ischemic stroke within 3 months up to February 1, 2023. Clinical characteristics were compared and analyzed between the good-outcome and poor-outcome groups and between the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and non-sICH groups respectively. Results A total of 16 studies including 24 cases of RIVT within 3 months were retrospectively analyzed in the present study. The patients’ ages ranged from 42 to 87 years (median 73.5 years) and the intervals between thrombolysis were from 0.25 to 90 days (median 9.5 days). Comparing the clinical characteristics between the good-outcome group and the poor-outcome group, no statistically significant differences were found (P > 0.05), but the differences in baseline National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score of the recurrent stroke (P = 0.056) and good outcome after the previous IVT (P = 0.054) nearly reached statistical significance. Comparing the data between the non-sICH group and the sICH group, statistically significant differences were found in terms of the proportion of cardiogenic embolism (P = 0.036), baseline NIHSS score in the recurrent stroke (P = 0.007) and the interval between thrombolysis (P = 0.041), but no significant difference was found by regression analysis. Conclusion In patients with recurrent ischemic stroke within 3 months, those with a good outcome after the previous IVT and a low baseline NIHSS score in the recurrent stroke may be considered for RIVT, whereas those with a high baseline NIHSS score, a short interval between thrombolysis, and cardiogenic embolism may suffer a higher risk of sICH. Due to sample size and publication bias, more studies with larger sample sizes and more rigorous designs are needed to confirm this conclusion.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03472-4Recurrent ischemic StrokeRepeated intravenous thrombolysisWithin 3 monthsSymptomatic intracranial Hemorrhage
spellingShingle Si-Yuan Wen
Fei-Fei Chen
Xiang-Ting Chen
Qian Zhang
Chang-Qing Zhou
Repeated intravenous thrombolysis in recurrent ischemic stroke within 3 months: a systematic review
BMC Neurology
Recurrent ischemic Stroke
Repeated intravenous thrombolysis
Within 3 months
Symptomatic intracranial Hemorrhage
title Repeated intravenous thrombolysis in recurrent ischemic stroke within 3 months: a systematic review
title_full Repeated intravenous thrombolysis in recurrent ischemic stroke within 3 months: a systematic review
title_fullStr Repeated intravenous thrombolysis in recurrent ischemic stroke within 3 months: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Repeated intravenous thrombolysis in recurrent ischemic stroke within 3 months: a systematic review
title_short Repeated intravenous thrombolysis in recurrent ischemic stroke within 3 months: a systematic review
title_sort repeated intravenous thrombolysis in recurrent ischemic stroke within 3 months a systematic review
topic Recurrent ischemic Stroke
Repeated intravenous thrombolysis
Within 3 months
Symptomatic intracranial Hemorrhage
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03472-4
work_keys_str_mv AT siyuanwen repeatedintravenousthrombolysisinrecurrentischemicstrokewithin3monthsasystematicreview
AT feifeichen repeatedintravenousthrombolysisinrecurrentischemicstrokewithin3monthsasystematicreview
AT xiangtingchen repeatedintravenousthrombolysisinrecurrentischemicstrokewithin3monthsasystematicreview
AT qianzhang repeatedintravenousthrombolysisinrecurrentischemicstrokewithin3monthsasystematicreview
AT changqingzhou repeatedintravenousthrombolysisinrecurrentischemicstrokewithin3monthsasystematicreview