Trends of Macroeconomic Models
This article provides an overview and analysis of the ideas of the leading macroeconomists expressed in the issue “Rebuilding Macroeconomic Theory”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy journal. These ideas were expressed in connection with the discussion of the future of macroeconomic models. The motiv...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
2019-04-01
|
| Series: | Управленческое консультирование |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1036 |
| _version_ | 1797290622252482560 |
|---|---|
| author | M. Yu. Andreyev A. V. Polbin |
| author_facet | M. Yu. Andreyev A. V. Polbin |
| author_sort | M. Yu. Andreyev |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article provides an overview and analysis of the ideas of the leading macroeconomists expressed in the issue “Rebuilding Macroeconomic Theory”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy journal. These ideas were expressed in connection with the discussion of the future of macroeconomic models. The motivation for the discussion lies in the poor performance of macroeconomic models before the global economic crisis of 2007–2008 and in the subsequent period of recovery. The main issue considered by economists is the possible changes in the basic neoKeynesian model and DSGE-models as a whole. It was found that there are three directions for the solution of the issue. First, the rejection of the primary role of DSGE-models in the analysis of modern macroeconomics and the use of other types of models. Secondly, the elimination of defciencies of existing models associated with poor justifcation at the micro level, as well as an unsatisfactory description of fnancial frictions. Thirdly, it is possible not to make any targeted efforts, since the class of DSGE-models is still the most efcient. The paper concludes that the second path of development is more preferable. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T19:25:07Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-990a9a1ec386481ca863f7d4fdeedf3a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1726-1139 1816-8590 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T19:25:07Z |
| publishDate | 2019-04-01 |
| publisher | North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Управленческое консультирование |
| spelling | doaj.art-990a9a1ec386481ca863f7d4fdeedf3a2024-02-29T09:36:13ZengNorth-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public AdministrationУправленческое консультирование1726-11391816-85902019-04-0102243310.22394/1726-1139-2019-2-24-33993Trends of Macroeconomic ModelsM. Yu. Andreyev0A. V. Polbin1Bank of RussiaRussian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public AdministrationThis article provides an overview and analysis of the ideas of the leading macroeconomists expressed in the issue “Rebuilding Macroeconomic Theory”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy journal. These ideas were expressed in connection with the discussion of the future of macroeconomic models. The motivation for the discussion lies in the poor performance of macroeconomic models before the global economic crisis of 2007–2008 and in the subsequent period of recovery. The main issue considered by economists is the possible changes in the basic neoKeynesian model and DSGE-models as a whole. It was found that there are three directions for the solution of the issue. First, the rejection of the primary role of DSGE-models in the analysis of modern macroeconomics and the use of other types of models. Secondly, the elimination of defciencies of existing models associated with poor justifcation at the micro level, as well as an unsatisfactory description of fnancial frictions. Thirdly, it is possible not to make any targeted efforts, since the class of DSGE-models is still the most efcient. The paper concludes that the second path of development is more preferable.https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1036macroeconomic modelsneo-keynesian modelfinancial crisisdsge-modelsrational expectationsstructural modelsfinancial frictionmicro foundations |
| spellingShingle | M. Yu. Andreyev A. V. Polbin Trends of Macroeconomic Models Управленческое консультирование macroeconomic models neo-keynesian model financial crisis dsge-models rational expectations structural models financial friction micro foundations |
| title | Trends of Macroeconomic Models |
| title_full | Trends of Macroeconomic Models |
| title_fullStr | Trends of Macroeconomic Models |
| title_full_unstemmed | Trends of Macroeconomic Models |
| title_short | Trends of Macroeconomic Models |
| title_sort | trends of macroeconomic models |
| topic | macroeconomic models neo-keynesian model financial crisis dsge-models rational expectations structural models financial friction micro foundations |
| url | https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1036 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT myuandreyev trendsofmacroeconomicmodels AT avpolbin trendsofmacroeconomicmodels |