Electrocautery vs. Stapler in Comparing Safety for Segmentectomy of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Electrocautery and staplers are regarded as the two most common surgical instruments for dissecting the intersegmental plane in segmentectomy. We performed a meta-analysis to compare electrocautery and staplers in terms of their safety and effects.Methods: A systematic search strategy wa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tianjian Lu, Ruoxi Zhang, Kexin Jiang, Zihuai Wang, Xiaohu Hao, Nan Chen, Lunxu Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.711685/full
_version_ 1818692173964509184
author Tianjian Lu
Tianjian Lu
Ruoxi Zhang
Kexin Jiang
Zihuai Wang
Zihuai Wang
Xiaohu Hao
Xiaohu Hao
Nan Chen
Nan Chen
Lunxu Liu
Lunxu Liu
author_facet Tianjian Lu
Tianjian Lu
Ruoxi Zhang
Kexin Jiang
Zihuai Wang
Zihuai Wang
Xiaohu Hao
Xiaohu Hao
Nan Chen
Nan Chen
Lunxu Liu
Lunxu Liu
author_sort Tianjian Lu
collection DOAJ
description Background: Electrocautery and staplers are regarded as the two most common surgical instruments for dissecting the intersegmental plane in segmentectomy. We performed a meta-analysis to compare electrocautery and staplers in terms of their safety and effects.Methods: A systematic search strategy was performed using PubMed, and the retrieval time was up to April 1, 2020. Odds ratio (OR) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CI were applied to determine the effectiveness of dichotomous or continuous variables, respectively.Results: Six studies including 385 patients were included. The electrocautery had a higher incidence rate of postoperative complication [OR= 1.92, 95% CI (1.12, 3.28), P = 0.02)] and air leak [OR: 3.91, 95% CI (1.64, 9.35), P = 0.002)]. No significant difference was found in the comparison of surgery time, blood loss, and duration of tube days or hospitality days.Conclusions: Our study indicated that patients under segmentectomy were associated with better safety by using stapler than electrocautery in the reduction of postoperative complications.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T12:53:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-991b905c8e63423e96ca6be19227f328
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-875X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T12:53:35Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Surgery
spelling doaj.art-991b905c8e63423e96ca6be19227f3282022-12-21T21:47:33ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2021-08-01810.3389/fsurg.2021.711685711685Electrocautery vs. Stapler in Comparing Safety for Segmentectomy of Lung Cancer: A Meta-AnalysisTianjian Lu0Tianjian Lu1Ruoxi Zhang2Kexin Jiang3Zihuai Wang4Zihuai Wang5Xiaohu Hao6Xiaohu Hao7Nan Chen8Nan Chen9Lunxu Liu10Lunxu Liu11Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaWestern China Collaborative Innovation Center for Early Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Therapy of Lung Cancer, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaBackground: Electrocautery and staplers are regarded as the two most common surgical instruments for dissecting the intersegmental plane in segmentectomy. We performed a meta-analysis to compare electrocautery and staplers in terms of their safety and effects.Methods: A systematic search strategy was performed using PubMed, and the retrieval time was up to April 1, 2020. Odds ratio (OR) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CI were applied to determine the effectiveness of dichotomous or continuous variables, respectively.Results: Six studies including 385 patients were included. The electrocautery had a higher incidence rate of postoperative complication [OR= 1.92, 95% CI (1.12, 3.28), P = 0.02)] and air leak [OR: 3.91, 95% CI (1.64, 9.35), P = 0.002)]. No significant difference was found in the comparison of surgery time, blood loss, and duration of tube days or hospitality days.Conclusions: Our study indicated that patients under segmentectomy were associated with better safety by using stapler than electrocautery in the reduction of postoperative complications.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.711685/fulllung cancersegmentectomypostoperative complicationelectrocauterylung
spellingShingle Tianjian Lu
Tianjian Lu
Ruoxi Zhang
Kexin Jiang
Zihuai Wang
Zihuai Wang
Xiaohu Hao
Xiaohu Hao
Nan Chen
Nan Chen
Lunxu Liu
Lunxu Liu
Electrocautery vs. Stapler in Comparing Safety for Segmentectomy of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
Frontiers in Surgery
lung cancer
segmentectomy
postoperative complication
electrocautery
lung
title Electrocautery vs. Stapler in Comparing Safety for Segmentectomy of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Electrocautery vs. Stapler in Comparing Safety for Segmentectomy of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Electrocautery vs. Stapler in Comparing Safety for Segmentectomy of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Electrocautery vs. Stapler in Comparing Safety for Segmentectomy of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Electrocautery vs. Stapler in Comparing Safety for Segmentectomy of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort electrocautery vs stapler in comparing safety for segmentectomy of lung cancer a meta analysis
topic lung cancer
segmentectomy
postoperative complication
electrocautery
lung
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.711685/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tianjianlu electrocauteryvsstaplerincomparingsafetyforsegmentectomyoflungcancerametaanalysis
AT tianjianlu electrocauteryvsstaplerincomparingsafetyforsegmentectomyoflungcancerametaanalysis
AT ruoxizhang electrocauteryvsstaplerincomparingsafetyforsegmentectomyoflungcancerametaanalysis
AT kexinjiang electrocauteryvsstaplerincomparingsafetyforsegmentectomyoflungcancerametaanalysis
AT zihuaiwang electrocauteryvsstaplerincomparingsafetyforsegmentectomyoflungcancerametaanalysis
AT zihuaiwang electrocauteryvsstaplerincomparingsafetyforsegmentectomyoflungcancerametaanalysis
AT xiaohuhao electrocauteryvsstaplerincomparingsafetyforsegmentectomyoflungcancerametaanalysis
AT xiaohuhao electrocauteryvsstaplerincomparingsafetyforsegmentectomyoflungcancerametaanalysis
AT nanchen electrocauteryvsstaplerincomparingsafetyforsegmentectomyoflungcancerametaanalysis
AT nanchen electrocauteryvsstaplerincomparingsafetyforsegmentectomyoflungcancerametaanalysis
AT lunxuliu electrocauteryvsstaplerincomparingsafetyforsegmentectomyoflungcancerametaanalysis
AT lunxuliu electrocauteryvsstaplerincomparingsafetyforsegmentectomyoflungcancerametaanalysis