Comparative evaluation of photovoltaic MPP trackers: A simulated approach

This paper makes a comparative assessment of three popular maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms used in photovoltaic power generation. A 120 Wp PV module is taken as reference for the study that is connected to a suitable resistive load by a boost converter. Two profiles of variation of so...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barnam Jyoti Saharia, Munish Manas, Bani Kanta Talukdar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-12-01
Series:Cogent Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2015.1137206
_version_ 1797722277697028096
author Barnam Jyoti Saharia
Munish Manas
Bani Kanta Talukdar
author_facet Barnam Jyoti Saharia
Munish Manas
Bani Kanta Talukdar
author_sort Barnam Jyoti Saharia
collection DOAJ
description This paper makes a comparative assessment of three popular maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms used in photovoltaic power generation. A 120 Wp PV module is taken as reference for the study that is connected to a suitable resistive load by a boost converter. Two profiles of variation of solar insolation at fixed temperature and varying temperature at fixed solar insolation are taken to test the tracking efficiency of three MPPT algorithms based on the perturb and observe (P&O), Fuzzy logic, and Neural Network techniques. MATLAB/SIMULINK simulation software is used for assessment, and the results indicate that the fuzzy logic-based tracker presents better tracking effectiveness to variations in both solar insolation and temperature profiles when compared to P&O technique and Neural Network-based technique.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T09:45:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-99207a1995ca462e9a5096cdf99b7f78
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2331-1916
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T09:45:14Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Cogent Engineering
spelling doaj.art-99207a1995ca462e9a5096cdf99b7f782023-09-02T12:56:09ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Engineering2331-19162016-12-013110.1080/23311916.2015.11372061137206Comparative evaluation of photovoltaic MPP trackers: A simulated approachBarnam Jyoti Saharia0Munish Manas1Bani Kanta Talukdar2Tezpur UniversityTezpur UniversityAssam Engineering CollegeThis paper makes a comparative assessment of three popular maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms used in photovoltaic power generation. A 120 Wp PV module is taken as reference for the study that is connected to a suitable resistive load by a boost converter. Two profiles of variation of solar insolation at fixed temperature and varying temperature at fixed solar insolation are taken to test the tracking efficiency of three MPPT algorithms based on the perturb and observe (P&O), Fuzzy logic, and Neural Network techniques. MATLAB/SIMULINK simulation software is used for assessment, and the results indicate that the fuzzy logic-based tracker presents better tracking effectiveness to variations in both solar insolation and temperature profiles when compared to P&O technique and Neural Network-based technique.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2015.1137206pvboost converterperturb and observefuzzy logicneural networkstracking factor
spellingShingle Barnam Jyoti Saharia
Munish Manas
Bani Kanta Talukdar
Comparative evaluation of photovoltaic MPP trackers: A simulated approach
Cogent Engineering
pv
boost converter
perturb and observe
fuzzy logic
neural networks
tracking factor
title Comparative evaluation of photovoltaic MPP trackers: A simulated approach
title_full Comparative evaluation of photovoltaic MPP trackers: A simulated approach
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of photovoltaic MPP trackers: A simulated approach
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of photovoltaic MPP trackers: A simulated approach
title_short Comparative evaluation of photovoltaic MPP trackers: A simulated approach
title_sort comparative evaluation of photovoltaic mpp trackers a simulated approach
topic pv
boost converter
perturb and observe
fuzzy logic
neural networks
tracking factor
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2015.1137206
work_keys_str_mv AT barnamjyotisaharia comparativeevaluationofphotovoltaicmpptrackersasimulatedapproach
AT munishmanas comparativeevaluationofphotovoltaicmpptrackersasimulatedapproach
AT banikantatalukdar comparativeevaluationofphotovoltaicmpptrackersasimulatedapproach