Assessing affect in adolescents with e-diaries: multilevel confirmatory factor analyses of different factor models

In the last two decades, e-diary studies have gained increasing interest, with a dominant focus on mood and affect. Although requested in current guidelines, psychometric properties are rarely reported, and methodological investigations of factor structure, model fit, and the reliability of mood and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthias F. Limberger, Florian Schmiedek, Philip S. Santangelo, Markus Reichert, Lena M. Wieland, Oksana Berhe, Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg, Heike Tost, Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1061229/full
_version_ 1797796674363457536
author Matthias F. Limberger
Florian Schmiedek
Florian Schmiedek
Florian Schmiedek
Philip S. Santangelo
Philip S. Santangelo
Markus Reichert
Markus Reichert
Markus Reichert
Lena M. Wieland
Lena M. Wieland
Lena M. Wieland
Oksana Berhe
Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg
Heike Tost
Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer
Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer
author_facet Matthias F. Limberger
Florian Schmiedek
Florian Schmiedek
Florian Schmiedek
Philip S. Santangelo
Philip S. Santangelo
Markus Reichert
Markus Reichert
Markus Reichert
Lena M. Wieland
Lena M. Wieland
Lena M. Wieland
Oksana Berhe
Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg
Heike Tost
Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer
Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer
author_sort Matthias F. Limberger
collection DOAJ
description In the last two decades, e-diary studies have gained increasing interest, with a dominant focus on mood and affect. Although requested in current guidelines, psychometric properties are rarely reported, and methodological investigations of factor structure, model fit, and the reliability of mood and affect assessment are limited. We used a seven-day e-diary dataset of 189 adolescent participants (12–17  years). The e-diary affect assessments revealed a considerable portion of within-person variance. The six-factor model showed the best model fit compared to the less complex models. Factor loadings also improved with the complexity of the models. Accordingly, we recommend that future e-diary studies of adolescents use the six-factor model of affect as well as reporting psychometric properties and model fit. For future e-diary scale development, we recommend using a minimum of three items per scale to enable the use of confirmatory multilevel factor analyses.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:36:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9920a3ec7d7a46578cdadff1c0f7ad2a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:36:36Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-9920a3ec7d7a46578cdadff1c0f7ad2a2023-06-23T17:41:25ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-06-011410.3389/fpsyg.2023.10612291061229Assessing affect in adolescents with e-diaries: multilevel confirmatory factor analyses of different factor modelsMatthias F. Limberger0Florian Schmiedek1Florian Schmiedek2Florian Schmiedek3Philip S. Santangelo4Philip S. Santangelo5Markus Reichert6Markus Reichert7Markus Reichert8Lena M. Wieland9Lena M. Wieland10Lena M. Wieland11Oksana Berhe12Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg13Heike Tost14Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer15Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer16Mental mHealth Lab, Institute for Sport and Sport Science, Faculty for Humanities and Social Sciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, GermanyLeibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education (DIPF), Frankfurt, GermanyIDeA Research Center for Individual Development and Adaptive Education of Children at Risk, Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Educational Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, GermanyMental mHealth Lab, Institute for Sport and Sport Science, Faculty for Humanities and Social Sciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, GermanyBehavioural Health Technology Interventions, Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Université du Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, LuxembourgMental mHealth Lab, Institute for Sport and Sport Science, Faculty for Humanities and Social Sciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, GermanyDepartment of eHealth and Sports Analytics, Faculty of Sports Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, GermanyMental mHealth Lab, Institute for Sport and Sport Science, Faculty for Humanities and Social Sciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, GermanyLeibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education (DIPF), Frankfurt, GermanyIDeA Research Center for Individual Development and Adaptive Education of Children at Risk, Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, GermanyMental mHealth Lab, Institute for Sport and Sport Science, Faculty for Humanities and Social Sciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, GermanyIn the last two decades, e-diary studies have gained increasing interest, with a dominant focus on mood and affect. Although requested in current guidelines, psychometric properties are rarely reported, and methodological investigations of factor structure, model fit, and the reliability of mood and affect assessment are limited. We used a seven-day e-diary dataset of 189 adolescent participants (12–17  years). The e-diary affect assessments revealed a considerable portion of within-person variance. The six-factor model showed the best model fit compared to the less complex models. Factor loadings also improved with the complexity of the models. Accordingly, we recommend that future e-diary studies of adolescents use the six-factor model of affect as well as reporting psychometric properties and model fit. For future e-diary scale development, we recommend using a minimum of three items per scale to enable the use of confirmatory multilevel factor analyses.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1061229/fullpsychometric propertiesaffectadolescentsreliabilityambulatory assessment
spellingShingle Matthias F. Limberger
Florian Schmiedek
Florian Schmiedek
Florian Schmiedek
Philip S. Santangelo
Philip S. Santangelo
Markus Reichert
Markus Reichert
Markus Reichert
Lena M. Wieland
Lena M. Wieland
Lena M. Wieland
Oksana Berhe
Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg
Heike Tost
Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer
Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer
Assessing affect in adolescents with e-diaries: multilevel confirmatory factor analyses of different factor models
Frontiers in Psychology
psychometric properties
affect
adolescents
reliability
ambulatory assessment
title Assessing affect in adolescents with e-diaries: multilevel confirmatory factor analyses of different factor models
title_full Assessing affect in adolescents with e-diaries: multilevel confirmatory factor analyses of different factor models
title_fullStr Assessing affect in adolescents with e-diaries: multilevel confirmatory factor analyses of different factor models
title_full_unstemmed Assessing affect in adolescents with e-diaries: multilevel confirmatory factor analyses of different factor models
title_short Assessing affect in adolescents with e-diaries: multilevel confirmatory factor analyses of different factor models
title_sort assessing affect in adolescents with e diaries multilevel confirmatory factor analyses of different factor models
topic psychometric properties
affect
adolescents
reliability
ambulatory assessment
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1061229/full
work_keys_str_mv AT matthiasflimberger assessingaffectinadolescentswithediariesmultilevelconfirmatoryfactoranalysesofdifferentfactormodels
AT florianschmiedek assessingaffectinadolescentswithediariesmultilevelconfirmatoryfactoranalysesofdifferentfactormodels
AT florianschmiedek assessingaffectinadolescentswithediariesmultilevelconfirmatoryfactoranalysesofdifferentfactormodels
AT florianschmiedek assessingaffectinadolescentswithediariesmultilevelconfirmatoryfactoranalysesofdifferentfactormodels
AT philipssantangelo assessingaffectinadolescentswithediariesmultilevelconfirmatoryfactoranalysesofdifferentfactormodels
AT philipssantangelo assessingaffectinadolescentswithediariesmultilevelconfirmatoryfactoranalysesofdifferentfactormodels
AT markusreichert assessingaffectinadolescentswithediariesmultilevelconfirmatoryfactoranalysesofdifferentfactormodels
AT markusreichert assessingaffectinadolescentswithediariesmultilevelconfirmatoryfactoranalysesofdifferentfactormodels
AT markusreichert assessingaffectinadolescentswithediariesmultilevelconfirmatoryfactoranalysesofdifferentfactormodels
AT lenamwieland assessingaffectinadolescentswithediariesmultilevelconfirmatoryfactoranalysesofdifferentfactormodels
AT lenamwieland assessingaffectinadolescentswithediariesmultilevelconfirmatoryfactoranalysesofdifferentfactormodels
AT lenamwieland assessingaffectinadolescentswithediariesmultilevelconfirmatoryfactoranalysesofdifferentfactormodels
AT oksanaberhe assessingaffectinadolescentswithediariesmultilevelconfirmatoryfactoranalysesofdifferentfactormodels
AT andreasmeyerlindenberg assessingaffectinadolescentswithediariesmultilevelconfirmatoryfactoranalysesofdifferentfactormodels
AT heiketost assessingaffectinadolescentswithediariesmultilevelconfirmatoryfactoranalysesofdifferentfactormodels
AT ulrichwebnerpriemer assessingaffectinadolescentswithediariesmultilevelconfirmatoryfactoranalysesofdifferentfactormodels
AT ulrichwebnerpriemer assessingaffectinadolescentswithediariesmultilevelconfirmatoryfactoranalysesofdifferentfactormodels