Proposal of a double ejector-two flash tank absorption refrigeration cycle: Energy, exergy and thermoeconomic evaluation

This research presents the proposal of a double ejector-two flash tank absorption refrigeration cycle, in which vapor and liquid ejectors are implemented simultaneously before the condensers and absorbers components. For the vapor ejector simulation, the shock circle approach is used. The internal e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Dhahi Gharir, L. Garousi Farshi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-10-01
Series:Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X23008043
_version_ 1797670313900638208
author A. Dhahi Gharir
L. Garousi Farshi
author_facet A. Dhahi Gharir
L. Garousi Farshi
author_sort A. Dhahi Gharir
collection DOAJ
description This research presents the proposal of a double ejector-two flash tank absorption refrigeration cycle, in which vapor and liquid ejectors are implemented simultaneously before the condensers and absorbers components. For the vapor ejector simulation, the shock circle approach is used. The internal environment of the vapor ejector, including the chocking phenomenon and the irreversible shock process, is also thoroughly examined. It is proposed that ejectors and flash tanks can improve the system performance. It is possible to improve the ejector entrainment ratio by incorporating a flash tank between the evaporator and condenser, which would also increase the evaporator cooling effect. Moreover, a second flash tank is installed between the generator and the absorber, which allows the generator to operate at a lower temperature and thus reduces the generator heat load. Consequently, the system's COP (coefficient of performance) increases. Furthermore, the unit cost of the final product in a wide range of operational conditions is calculated. The findings revealed up to 56.8% increase in the COP. The improvement of the maximum exergetic efficiency in the new cycle compared to the basic cycle also reaches 22.5%. Moreover, the thermoeconomic investigation show up to 34.6%. reduction in product cost.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T20:57:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-99346c7225274dee9cf89bf0775d5252
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2214-157X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T20:57:52Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
spelling doaj.art-99346c7225274dee9cf89bf0775d52522023-09-30T04:54:51ZengElsevierCase Studies in Thermal Engineering2214-157X2023-10-0150103498Proposal of a double ejector-two flash tank absorption refrigeration cycle: Energy, exergy and thermoeconomic evaluationA. Dhahi Gharir0L. Garousi Farshi1Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, IranCorresponding author.; Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, IranThis research presents the proposal of a double ejector-two flash tank absorption refrigeration cycle, in which vapor and liquid ejectors are implemented simultaneously before the condensers and absorbers components. For the vapor ejector simulation, the shock circle approach is used. The internal environment of the vapor ejector, including the chocking phenomenon and the irreversible shock process, is also thoroughly examined. It is proposed that ejectors and flash tanks can improve the system performance. It is possible to improve the ejector entrainment ratio by incorporating a flash tank between the evaporator and condenser, which would also increase the evaporator cooling effect. Moreover, a second flash tank is installed between the generator and the absorber, which allows the generator to operate at a lower temperature and thus reduces the generator heat load. Consequently, the system's COP (coefficient of performance) increases. Furthermore, the unit cost of the final product in a wide range of operational conditions is calculated. The findings revealed up to 56.8% increase in the COP. The improvement of the maximum exergetic efficiency in the new cycle compared to the basic cycle also reaches 22.5%. Moreover, the thermoeconomic investigation show up to 34.6%. reduction in product cost.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X23008043Absorption refrigerationFlash tankDouble ejectorThermoeconomic analysisProduct cost
spellingShingle A. Dhahi Gharir
L. Garousi Farshi
Proposal of a double ejector-two flash tank absorption refrigeration cycle: Energy, exergy and thermoeconomic evaluation
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Absorption refrigeration
Flash tank
Double ejector
Thermoeconomic analysis
Product cost
title Proposal of a double ejector-two flash tank absorption refrigeration cycle: Energy, exergy and thermoeconomic evaluation
title_full Proposal of a double ejector-two flash tank absorption refrigeration cycle: Energy, exergy and thermoeconomic evaluation
title_fullStr Proposal of a double ejector-two flash tank absorption refrigeration cycle: Energy, exergy and thermoeconomic evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Proposal of a double ejector-two flash tank absorption refrigeration cycle: Energy, exergy and thermoeconomic evaluation
title_short Proposal of a double ejector-two flash tank absorption refrigeration cycle: Energy, exergy and thermoeconomic evaluation
title_sort proposal of a double ejector two flash tank absorption refrigeration cycle energy exergy and thermoeconomic evaluation
topic Absorption refrigeration
Flash tank
Double ejector
Thermoeconomic analysis
Product cost
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X23008043
work_keys_str_mv AT adhahigharir proposalofadoubleejectortwoflashtankabsorptionrefrigerationcycleenergyexergyandthermoeconomicevaluation
AT lgarousifarshi proposalofadoubleejectortwoflashtankabsorptionrefrigerationcycleenergyexergyandthermoeconomicevaluation