In Defense of Gibbs and the Traditional Definition of the Entropy of Distinguishable Particles
The traditional Gibbs’ calculation of the entropy of distinguishable classical particles that leads to Gibbs Paradox has been criticized recently. This criticism, if valid, would require a substantially different definition of entropy in general. However, the traditional definition of entropy works...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2010-08-01
|
| Series: | Entropy |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/12/8/1936/ |
| _version_ | 1798037727165284352 |
|---|---|
| author | John F. Nagle |
| author_facet | John F. Nagle |
| author_sort | John F. Nagle |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The traditional Gibbs’ calculation of the entropy of distinguishable classical particles that leads to Gibbs Paradox has been criticized recently. This criticism, if valid, would require a substantially different definition of entropy in general. However, the traditional definition of entropy works quite well in situations where the distinguishability of classical particles is taken seriously while a suggested replacement definition fails. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T21:30:29Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-993931a8a8334f9ca6b0f8e5afd62f35 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1099-4300 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T21:30:29Z |
| publishDate | 2010-08-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Entropy |
| spelling | doaj.art-993931a8a8334f9ca6b0f8e5afd62f352022-12-22T04:02:01ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002010-08-011281936194510.3390/e12081936In Defense of Gibbs and the Traditional Definition of the Entropy of Distinguishable ParticlesJohn F. NagleThe traditional Gibbs’ calculation of the entropy of distinguishable classical particles that leads to Gibbs Paradox has been criticized recently. This criticism, if valid, would require a substantially different definition of entropy in general. However, the traditional definition of entropy works quite well in situations where the distinguishability of classical particles is taken seriously while a suggested replacement definition fails.http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/12/8/1936/Gibbsentropydistinguishable particlesinformation |
| spellingShingle | John F. Nagle In Defense of Gibbs and the Traditional Definition of the Entropy of Distinguishable Particles Entropy Gibbs entropy distinguishable particles information |
| title | In Defense of Gibbs and the Traditional Definition of the Entropy of Distinguishable Particles |
| title_full | In Defense of Gibbs and the Traditional Definition of the Entropy of Distinguishable Particles |
| title_fullStr | In Defense of Gibbs and the Traditional Definition of the Entropy of Distinguishable Particles |
| title_full_unstemmed | In Defense of Gibbs and the Traditional Definition of the Entropy of Distinguishable Particles |
| title_short | In Defense of Gibbs and the Traditional Definition of the Entropy of Distinguishable Particles |
| title_sort | in defense of gibbs and the traditional definition of the entropy of distinguishable particles |
| topic | Gibbs entropy distinguishable particles information |
| url | http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/12/8/1936/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT johnfnagle indefenseofgibbsandthetraditionaldefinitionoftheentropyofdistinguishableparticles |