Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: Analysis of prognostic factors and patterns of metastasis

Objectives: To describe characteristics and outcomes of patients with small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (SCNCC) and determine the staging system most predictive of outcome—the two-tier (limited-stage [LS] vs. extensive-stage [ES]) or International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sushmita Gordhandas, Brooke A. Schlappe, Qin Zhou, Alexia Iasonos, Mario M. Leitao, Jr., Kay J. Park, Louise de Brot, Kaled M. Alektiar, Paul J. Sabbatini, Carol A. Aghajanian, Claire Friedman, Oliver Zivanovic, Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-10-01
Series:Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578922001382
_version_ 1798020615471366144
author Sushmita Gordhandas
Brooke A. Schlappe
Qin Zhou
Alexia Iasonos
Mario M. Leitao, Jr.
Kay J. Park
Louise de Brot
Kaled M. Alektiar
Paul J. Sabbatini
Carol A. Aghajanian
Claire Friedman
Oliver Zivanovic
Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
author_facet Sushmita Gordhandas
Brooke A. Schlappe
Qin Zhou
Alexia Iasonos
Mario M. Leitao, Jr.
Kay J. Park
Louise de Brot
Kaled M. Alektiar
Paul J. Sabbatini
Carol A. Aghajanian
Claire Friedman
Oliver Zivanovic
Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
author_sort Sushmita Gordhandas
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: To describe characteristics and outcomes of patients with small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (SCNCC) and determine the staging system most predictive of outcome—the two-tier (limited-stage [LS] vs. extensive-stage [ES]) or International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. Methods: Patients with SCNCC evaluated at our institution from 1/1/1990–6/30/2021 were included. Medical records were reviewed for variables of interest. Appropriate statistical tests were performed to determine associations. Survival curves were created using the Kaplan-Meier method. Concordance probability estimates (CPEs) were calculated to evaluate the prediction probability of the staging systems. Results: Of 63 patients, 41 had LS and 22 ES SCNCC. Patients with ES disease were significantly older than those with LS disease (median, 54 and 37 years, respectively; p < 0.001). Smoking status, race, and history of HPV were not associated with stage or outcomes. Forty-eight patients had metastatic disease (24 [50%] at initial diagnosis). The most common first sites of metastasis were lung (n = 20/48, 42%), lymph nodes (n = 19/48, 40%), and liver (n = 13/48, 27%). Nine patients had brain metastasis (8 symptomatic at recurrence; 1 asymptomatic at initial diagnosis). Both staging systems were associated with progression-free and overall survival. Adjusted CPE found the FIGO staging system was more predictive of outcomes than the two-tier staging system. Conclusions: Providers should have a low threshold to obtain brain imaging for patients with SCNCC, especially in the presence of visceral metastases. FIGO staging should be used to classify SCNCC. Further research is necessary to understand prognostic factors of this rare disease.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T17:00:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-994ad548680a4c9b965eec774ef38912
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-5789
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T17:00:21Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Gynecologic Oncology Reports
spelling doaj.art-994ad548680a4c9b965eec774ef389122022-12-22T04:13:10ZengElsevierGynecologic Oncology Reports2352-57892022-10-0143101058Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: Analysis of prognostic factors and patterns of metastasisSushmita Gordhandas0Brooke A. Schlappe1Qin Zhou2Alexia Iasonos3Mario M. Leitao, Jr.4Kay J. Park5Louise de Brot6Kaled M. Alektiar7Paul J. Sabbatini8Carol A. Aghajanian9Claire Friedman10Oliver Zivanovic11Roisin E O'Cearbhaill12Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Currently at: Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, WI, USADepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USADepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USADepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAA.C. Camargo Cancer Center, Anatomic Pathology Department, São Paulo, BrazilDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USAGynecologic Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USAGynecologic Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USAGynecologic Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USAGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USAGynecologic Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Corresponding author: Gynecology Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275, York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.Objectives: To describe characteristics and outcomes of patients with small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (SCNCC) and determine the staging system most predictive of outcome—the two-tier (limited-stage [LS] vs. extensive-stage [ES]) or International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. Methods: Patients with SCNCC evaluated at our institution from 1/1/1990–6/30/2021 were included. Medical records were reviewed for variables of interest. Appropriate statistical tests were performed to determine associations. Survival curves were created using the Kaplan-Meier method. Concordance probability estimates (CPEs) were calculated to evaluate the prediction probability of the staging systems. Results: Of 63 patients, 41 had LS and 22 ES SCNCC. Patients with ES disease were significantly older than those with LS disease (median, 54 and 37 years, respectively; p < 0.001). Smoking status, race, and history of HPV were not associated with stage or outcomes. Forty-eight patients had metastatic disease (24 [50%] at initial diagnosis). The most common first sites of metastasis were lung (n = 20/48, 42%), lymph nodes (n = 19/48, 40%), and liver (n = 13/48, 27%). Nine patients had brain metastasis (8 symptomatic at recurrence; 1 asymptomatic at initial diagnosis). Both staging systems were associated with progression-free and overall survival. Adjusted CPE found the FIGO staging system was more predictive of outcomes than the two-tier staging system. Conclusions: Providers should have a low threshold to obtain brain imaging for patients with SCNCC, especially in the presence of visceral metastases. FIGO staging should be used to classify SCNCC. Further research is necessary to understand prognostic factors of this rare disease.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578922001382Cervical cancerSmall cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervixStagingMetastasisPrognosis
spellingShingle Sushmita Gordhandas
Brooke A. Schlappe
Qin Zhou
Alexia Iasonos
Mario M. Leitao, Jr.
Kay J. Park
Louise de Brot
Kaled M. Alektiar
Paul J. Sabbatini
Carol A. Aghajanian
Claire Friedman
Oliver Zivanovic
Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: Analysis of prognostic factors and patterns of metastasis
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Cervical cancer
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix
Staging
Metastasis
Prognosis
title Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: Analysis of prognostic factors and patterns of metastasis
title_full Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: Analysis of prognostic factors and patterns of metastasis
title_fullStr Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: Analysis of prognostic factors and patterns of metastasis
title_full_unstemmed Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: Analysis of prognostic factors and patterns of metastasis
title_short Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: Analysis of prognostic factors and patterns of metastasis
title_sort small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix analysis of prognostic factors and patterns of metastasis
topic Cervical cancer
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix
Staging
Metastasis
Prognosis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578922001382
work_keys_str_mv AT sushmitagordhandas smallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomaofthecervixanalysisofprognosticfactorsandpatternsofmetastasis
AT brookeaschlappe smallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomaofthecervixanalysisofprognosticfactorsandpatternsofmetastasis
AT qinzhou smallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomaofthecervixanalysisofprognosticfactorsandpatternsofmetastasis
AT alexiaiasonos smallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomaofthecervixanalysisofprognosticfactorsandpatternsofmetastasis
AT mariomleitaojr smallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomaofthecervixanalysisofprognosticfactorsandpatternsofmetastasis
AT kayjpark smallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomaofthecervixanalysisofprognosticfactorsandpatternsofmetastasis
AT louisedebrot smallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomaofthecervixanalysisofprognosticfactorsandpatternsofmetastasis
AT kaledmalektiar smallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomaofthecervixanalysisofprognosticfactorsandpatternsofmetastasis
AT pauljsabbatini smallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomaofthecervixanalysisofprognosticfactorsandpatternsofmetastasis
AT carolaaghajanian smallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomaofthecervixanalysisofprognosticfactorsandpatternsofmetastasis
AT clairefriedman smallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomaofthecervixanalysisofprognosticfactorsandpatternsofmetastasis
AT oliverzivanovic smallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomaofthecervixanalysisofprognosticfactorsandpatternsofmetastasis
AT roisineocearbhaill smallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomaofthecervixanalysisofprognosticfactorsandpatternsofmetastasis