Claude Lanzmann and Georges Didi-Huberman: Two Theories of Representing the 20th - Century Inhuman Experience

In the present academic paper the author analyzes two different points of view on the role played by the image in the representation of one of the most tragic events in contemporary history, that of the Holocaust. According to Claude Lanzmann, French filmmaker and the author of the famous documentar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Skopin Denis Aleksandrovich
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Volgograd State University 2015-06-01
Series:Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 4. История, регионоведение, международные отношения
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/901
_version_ 1797694120518483968
author Skopin Denis Aleksandrovich
author_facet Skopin Denis Aleksandrovich
author_sort Skopin Denis Aleksandrovich
collection DOAJ
description In the present academic paper the author analyzes two different points of view on the role played by the image in the representation of one of the most tragic events in contemporary history, that of the Holocaust. According to Claude Lanzmann, French filmmaker and the author of the famous documentary “Shoah”, the image is not able to tell us the truth about the Holocaust. The reality of the Holocaust is beyond the power of the image and our imagination is not able to reach the “sublime” experience. Lanzmann’s argumentation is very close to that of J-F. Lyotard in the “Discord”, who believes that all direct representations of the Shoah are doomed to failure. The only way to represent the Holocaust events is to make speak the eyewitnesses, as Lanzmann did in his film. This point of view is criticized by Georges Didi-Huberman in his book “Images in spite of all”. He tells the story of four photographs taken in Auschwitz by prisoners in 1944 and argues that the images can play a very important role in getting the historical truth as they depict the very truth of those tragic moments. As for the imagination, it also takes part in the building of our historical picture.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T02:53:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-99704124db8d4360970a3795022e8941
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1998-9938
2312-8704
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-03-12T02:53:20Z
publishDate 2015-06-01
publisher Volgograd State University
record_format Article
series Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 4. История, регионоведение, международные отношения
spelling doaj.art-99704124db8d4360970a3795022e89412023-09-03T15:26:46ZrusVolgograd State UniversityВестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 4. История, регионоведение, международные отношения1998-99382312-87042015-06-012798810.15688/jvolsu4.2015.2.8Claude Lanzmann and Georges Didi-Huberman: Two Theories of Representing the 20th - Century Inhuman ExperienceSkopin Denis Aleksandrovich0Saint Petersburg State UniversityIn the present academic paper the author analyzes two different points of view on the role played by the image in the representation of one of the most tragic events in contemporary history, that of the Holocaust. According to Claude Lanzmann, French filmmaker and the author of the famous documentary “Shoah”, the image is not able to tell us the truth about the Holocaust. The reality of the Holocaust is beyond the power of the image and our imagination is not able to reach the “sublime” experience. Lanzmann’s argumentation is very close to that of J-F. Lyotard in the “Discord”, who believes that all direct representations of the Shoah are doomed to failure. The only way to represent the Holocaust events is to make speak the eyewitnesses, as Lanzmann did in his film. This point of view is criticized by Georges Didi-Huberman in his book “Images in spite of all”. He tells the story of four photographs taken in Auschwitz by prisoners in 1944 and argues that the images can play a very important role in getting the historical truth as they depict the very truth of those tragic moments. As for the imagination, it also takes part in the building of our historical picture.http://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/901history of the 20th centuryHolocaustwitnessrepresentationphotographymovie
spellingShingle Skopin Denis Aleksandrovich
Claude Lanzmann and Georges Didi-Huberman: Two Theories of Representing the 20th - Century Inhuman Experience
Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 4. История, регионоведение, международные отношения
history of the 20th century
Holocaust
witness
representation
photography
movie
title Claude Lanzmann and Georges Didi-Huberman: Two Theories of Representing the 20th - Century Inhuman Experience
title_full Claude Lanzmann and Georges Didi-Huberman: Two Theories of Representing the 20th - Century Inhuman Experience
title_fullStr Claude Lanzmann and Georges Didi-Huberman: Two Theories of Representing the 20th - Century Inhuman Experience
title_full_unstemmed Claude Lanzmann and Georges Didi-Huberman: Two Theories of Representing the 20th - Century Inhuman Experience
title_short Claude Lanzmann and Georges Didi-Huberman: Two Theories of Representing the 20th - Century Inhuman Experience
title_sort claude lanzmann and georges didi huberman two theories of representing the 20th century inhuman experience
topic history of the 20th century
Holocaust
witness
representation
photography
movie
url http://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/901
work_keys_str_mv AT skopindenisaleksandrovich claudelanzmannandgeorgesdidihubermantwotheoriesofrepresentingthe20thcenturyinhumanexperience