Career Choices and Moral Choices. Changing Tracks in the Trolley Problem

Numerous authors indicate that the influence of academic education extends beyond the growth of specialized knowledge gained by the graduates. Scholars are trying to identify and examine the potential impact of higher learning on students’ attitudes and choices. One of the dimensions considered by t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dzionek-Kozłowska Joanna, Rehman Sharaf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2019-09-01
Series:Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2019-0036
_version_ 1818597099072126976
author Dzionek-Kozłowska Joanna
Rehman Sharaf
author_facet Dzionek-Kozłowska Joanna
Rehman Sharaf
author_sort Dzionek-Kozłowska Joanna
collection DOAJ
description Numerous authors indicate that the influence of academic education extends beyond the growth of specialized knowledge gained by the graduates. Scholars are trying to identify and examine the potential impact of higher learning on students’ attitudes and choices. One of the dimensions considered by the researchers is the effect of university training on students’ moral choices. Our paper attempts to identify differences between the students’ declared moral choices and their majors (fields of studies). Working with a sample of university students of Economics and Sociology (N = 181), and using three variants of the Trolley Problem, the subjects’ responses are used to identify the similarities and differences between their choices. The participants were asked to respond to three hypothetical situations regarding a runaway trolley. Their decision in the first scenario could save a person’s life or let her be run over by the trolley. In the second scenario, their decision could either let one person die and save five lives or save one life and let five people be killed. These two scenarios required pulling a lever to switch the trolley from one track to another. The third scenario requires pushing an obese person in front of the runaway trolley to stop it from killing five persons. As expected, we found a significant difference between the two groups (the economists and the sociologists) in the case of our third scenario, however, we found no evidence supporting the indoctrination hypothesis. We conclude that the existing differences between the choices made by the future economists and sociologists may support the preselection hypothesis.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T11:42:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-997783f136a84388ac775054fbc6005e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0860-150X
2199-6059
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T11:42:25Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
spelling doaj.art-997783f136a84388ac775054fbc6005e2022-12-21T22:32:54ZengSciendoStudies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric0860-150X2199-60592019-09-0159117718910.2478/slgr-2019-0036slgr-2019-0036Career Choices and Moral Choices. Changing Tracks in the Trolley ProblemDzionek-Kozłowska Joanna0Rehman Sharaf1University of LodzUniversity of Texas Rio Grande ValleyNumerous authors indicate that the influence of academic education extends beyond the growth of specialized knowledge gained by the graduates. Scholars are trying to identify and examine the potential impact of higher learning on students’ attitudes and choices. One of the dimensions considered by the researchers is the effect of university training on students’ moral choices. Our paper attempts to identify differences between the students’ declared moral choices and their majors (fields of studies). Working with a sample of university students of Economics and Sociology (N = 181), and using three variants of the Trolley Problem, the subjects’ responses are used to identify the similarities and differences between their choices. The participants were asked to respond to three hypothetical situations regarding a runaway trolley. Their decision in the first scenario could save a person’s life or let her be run over by the trolley. In the second scenario, their decision could either let one person die and save five lives or save one life and let five people be killed. These two scenarios required pulling a lever to switch the trolley from one track to another. The third scenario requires pushing an obese person in front of the runaway trolley to stop it from killing five persons. As expected, we found a significant difference between the two groups (the economists and the sociologists) in the case of our third scenario, however, we found no evidence supporting the indoctrination hypothesis. We conclude that the existing differences between the choices made by the future economists and sociologists may support the preselection hypothesis.https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2019-0036decision makingtrolley probleminconsistency of choicesindoctrination hypothesispreselection hypothesis
spellingShingle Dzionek-Kozłowska Joanna
Rehman Sharaf
Career Choices and Moral Choices. Changing Tracks in the Trolley Problem
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
decision making
trolley problem
inconsistency of choices
indoctrination hypothesis
preselection hypothesis
title Career Choices and Moral Choices. Changing Tracks in the Trolley Problem
title_full Career Choices and Moral Choices. Changing Tracks in the Trolley Problem
title_fullStr Career Choices and Moral Choices. Changing Tracks in the Trolley Problem
title_full_unstemmed Career Choices and Moral Choices. Changing Tracks in the Trolley Problem
title_short Career Choices and Moral Choices. Changing Tracks in the Trolley Problem
title_sort career choices and moral choices changing tracks in the trolley problem
topic decision making
trolley problem
inconsistency of choices
indoctrination hypothesis
preselection hypothesis
url https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2019-0036
work_keys_str_mv AT dzionekkozłowskajoanna careerchoicesandmoralchoiceschangingtracksinthetrolleyproblem
AT rehmansharaf careerchoicesandmoralchoiceschangingtracksinthetrolleyproblem