The Use of Micro capsulated Feed as Alternative to Artemia sp. in The Food of Guppy and Goldfish Larvae
In this study, the effects of Artemia sp. nauplii and micro capsulated feed on growth performance and survival rate of guppy (Poecilia reticulata) and goldfish (Carassius auratus) larvae were compared at the end of three weeks of rearing period. Length of goldfish larvae (4.82 mm) fed Artemia sp. (f...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/2611 |
_version_ | 1797909701405442048 |
---|---|
author | Mahmut Yanar Çiğdem Çalım Akray Ece Evliyaoğlu Zeynep Erçen |
author_facet | Mahmut Yanar Çiğdem Çalım Akray Ece Evliyaoğlu Zeynep Erçen |
author_sort | Mahmut Yanar |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In this study, the effects of Artemia sp. nauplii and micro capsulated feed on growth performance and survival rate of guppy (Poecilia reticulata) and goldfish (Carassius auratus) larvae were compared at the end of three weeks of rearing period. Length of goldfish larvae (4.82 mm) fed Artemia sp. (from 4 to 12/mL/day) were between 7.97 and 9.76 mm at the end of the trial while these values were between 6.80 and 7.21 mm for those fed microencapsulated feed (from 10 to 30 mg/L/day). On the other hand length of guppy larvae fed Artemia sp. (from 5 to 25/mL/day) were between 13.02 and 17.00 mm, whereas these values were remained between 11.98 and 12.38 mm for those fed microencapsulated feed (from 10 to 40 mg/L/day). A similar result was also observed in survival rates. Survival rate of goldfish larvae fed Artemia sp. were 88.91-97.61% in while those fed microencapsulated feed were 6.19-87.14%. On the other hand survival rate of guppy larvae fed Artemia sp. were 99.17-100.00% whereas those fed microencapsulated feed were 57.50-87.50%. Eventually, microencapsulated feed was not as successful as Artemia sp. on the growth and survival rate of larvae of both species. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T11:12:41Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9977e798fa8b432f8d2c990d3e62aecd |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2148-127X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T11:12:41Z |
publishDate | 2019-10-01 |
publisher | Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP) |
record_format | Article |
series | Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology |
spelling | doaj.art-9977e798fa8b432f8d2c990d3e62aecd2023-02-15T16:19:00ZengTurkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology2148-127X2019-10-017101575158010.24925/turjaf.v7i10.1575-1580.26111269The Use of Micro capsulated Feed as Alternative to Artemia sp. in The Food of Guppy and Goldfish LarvaeMahmut Yanar0Çiğdem Çalım Akray1Ece Evliyaoğlu2Zeynep Erçen3Faculty of Fisheries, Çukurova University, 01380 Sarıçam/AdanaFaculty of Fisheries, Çukurova University, 01380 Sarıçam/AdanaFaculty of Fisheries, Çukurova University, 01380 Sarıçam/AdanaÇukurova University, Vocational School of Adana, 01380 Sarıçam/AdanaIn this study, the effects of Artemia sp. nauplii and micro capsulated feed on growth performance and survival rate of guppy (Poecilia reticulata) and goldfish (Carassius auratus) larvae were compared at the end of three weeks of rearing period. Length of goldfish larvae (4.82 mm) fed Artemia sp. (from 4 to 12/mL/day) were between 7.97 and 9.76 mm at the end of the trial while these values were between 6.80 and 7.21 mm for those fed microencapsulated feed (from 10 to 30 mg/L/day). On the other hand length of guppy larvae fed Artemia sp. (from 5 to 25/mL/day) were between 13.02 and 17.00 mm, whereas these values were remained between 11.98 and 12.38 mm for those fed microencapsulated feed (from 10 to 40 mg/L/day). A similar result was also observed in survival rates. Survival rate of goldfish larvae fed Artemia sp. were 88.91-97.61% in while those fed microencapsulated feed were 6.19-87.14%. On the other hand survival rate of guppy larvae fed Artemia sp. were 99.17-100.00% whereas those fed microencapsulated feed were 57.50-87.50%. Eventually, microencapsulated feed was not as successful as Artemia sp. on the growth and survival rate of larvae of both species.http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/2611carassius auratuspoecilia reticulataartemiamikrokapsül yemlarva besleme |
spellingShingle | Mahmut Yanar Çiğdem Çalım Akray Ece Evliyaoğlu Zeynep Erçen The Use of Micro capsulated Feed as Alternative to Artemia sp. in The Food of Guppy and Goldfish Larvae Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology carassius auratus poecilia reticulata artemia mikrokapsül yem larva besleme |
title | The Use of Micro capsulated Feed as Alternative to Artemia sp. in The Food of Guppy and Goldfish Larvae |
title_full | The Use of Micro capsulated Feed as Alternative to Artemia sp. in The Food of Guppy and Goldfish Larvae |
title_fullStr | The Use of Micro capsulated Feed as Alternative to Artemia sp. in The Food of Guppy and Goldfish Larvae |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of Micro capsulated Feed as Alternative to Artemia sp. in The Food of Guppy and Goldfish Larvae |
title_short | The Use of Micro capsulated Feed as Alternative to Artemia sp. in The Food of Guppy and Goldfish Larvae |
title_sort | use of micro capsulated feed as alternative to artemia sp in the food of guppy and goldfish larvae |
topic | carassius auratus poecilia reticulata artemia mikrokapsül yem larva besleme |
url | http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/2611 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahmutyanar theuseofmicrocapsulatedfeedasalternativetoartemiaspinthefoodofguppyandgoldfishlarvae AT cigdemcalımakray theuseofmicrocapsulatedfeedasalternativetoartemiaspinthefoodofguppyandgoldfishlarvae AT eceevliyaoglu theuseofmicrocapsulatedfeedasalternativetoartemiaspinthefoodofguppyandgoldfishlarvae AT zeynepercen theuseofmicrocapsulatedfeedasalternativetoartemiaspinthefoodofguppyandgoldfishlarvae AT mahmutyanar useofmicrocapsulatedfeedasalternativetoartemiaspinthefoodofguppyandgoldfishlarvae AT cigdemcalımakray useofmicrocapsulatedfeedasalternativetoartemiaspinthefoodofguppyandgoldfishlarvae AT eceevliyaoglu useofmicrocapsulatedfeedasalternativetoartemiaspinthefoodofguppyandgoldfishlarvae AT zeynepercen useofmicrocapsulatedfeedasalternativetoartemiaspinthefoodofguppyandgoldfishlarvae |