Petrie at Hawara: Pioneering Debatable Standards?
Flinders Petrie’s first two seasons in Hawara, between 1888 and 1889, and their subsequent exhibitions in London, were arguably pivotal for the career of the British archaeologist. They also provide a wealth of documentation in his own hand to better 'understand' the man. But to better �...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2022-11-01
|
| Series: | Bulletin of the History of Archaeology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.archaeologybulletin.org/articles/666 |
| _version_ | 1811178193502076928 |
|---|---|
| author | David Brügger |
| author_facet | David Brügger |
| author_sort | David Brügger |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Flinders Petrie’s first two seasons in Hawara, between 1888 and 1889, and their subsequent exhibitions in London, were arguably pivotal for the career of the British archaeologist. They also provide a wealth of documentation in his own hand to better 'understand' the man. But to better 'critique' him, this paper aims to reassess Petrie’s mindset, field work, and results in Hawara, first by the standards he began to craft for himself in the field, before briefly taking a modern perspective to complete the critical picture. To evaluate Petrie’s work by his own ambition, what could be more appropriate than to take him at his word? In the seminal 'Methods & Aims in Archaeology' of 1904, he would neatly set out his vision and the practicalities for the discipline. This assessment proffers to proceed along the original processual chapters of the book to examine how Petrie’s practices in Hawara in 1888–1889 already pioneer the theory he would consolidate 15 years later, while incorporating the latest research views. The main sources for this review are, by order of relevance, threefold: first, his original hand-written documentation from two so-called ‘Journals’ collected from letters, eight excavation ‘Notebooks’ and three ‘Day Diaries’; second, his publications for both seasons; and third, his autobiographical pieces. It appears that the ‘Father of Egyptian Archaeology’ did not entirely live up to his nascent ambition, leaving a contentious legacy to this day. The urge of the ‘salvage man’, trapped in contradictions, produced good results for the time but may also have led him astray in terms of aims and methods. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T06:14:21Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-997ee23237d244f5bc8966bd0a0b81f5 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2047-6930 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T06:14:21Z |
| publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
| publisher | Ubiquity Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Bulletin of the History of Archaeology |
| spelling | doaj.art-997ee23237d244f5bc8966bd0a0b81f52022-12-22T04:41:06ZengUbiquity PressBulletin of the History of Archaeology2047-69302022-11-0132110.5334/bha-666610Petrie at Hawara: Pioneering Debatable Standards?David Brügger0University of ManchesterFlinders Petrie’s first two seasons in Hawara, between 1888 and 1889, and their subsequent exhibitions in London, were arguably pivotal for the career of the British archaeologist. They also provide a wealth of documentation in his own hand to better 'understand' the man. But to better 'critique' him, this paper aims to reassess Petrie’s mindset, field work, and results in Hawara, first by the standards he began to craft for himself in the field, before briefly taking a modern perspective to complete the critical picture. To evaluate Petrie’s work by his own ambition, what could be more appropriate than to take him at his word? In the seminal 'Methods & Aims in Archaeology' of 1904, he would neatly set out his vision and the practicalities for the discipline. This assessment proffers to proceed along the original processual chapters of the book to examine how Petrie’s practices in Hawara in 1888–1889 already pioneer the theory he would consolidate 15 years later, while incorporating the latest research views. The main sources for this review are, by order of relevance, threefold: first, his original hand-written documentation from two so-called ‘Journals’ collected from letters, eight excavation ‘Notebooks’ and three ‘Day Diaries’; second, his publications for both seasons; and third, his autobiographical pieces. It appears that the ‘Father of Egyptian Archaeology’ did not entirely live up to his nascent ambition, leaving a contentious legacy to this day. The urge of the ‘salvage man’, trapped in contradictions, produced good results for the time but may also have led him astray in terms of aims and methods.https://www.archaeologybulletin.org/articles/666archaeologyegyptologypetriehawarafieldworkmethods |
| spellingShingle | David Brügger Petrie at Hawara: Pioneering Debatable Standards? Bulletin of the History of Archaeology archaeology egyptology petrie hawara fieldwork methods |
| title | Petrie at Hawara: Pioneering Debatable Standards? |
| title_full | Petrie at Hawara: Pioneering Debatable Standards? |
| title_fullStr | Petrie at Hawara: Pioneering Debatable Standards? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Petrie at Hawara: Pioneering Debatable Standards? |
| title_short | Petrie at Hawara: Pioneering Debatable Standards? |
| title_sort | petrie at hawara pioneering debatable standards |
| topic | archaeology egyptology petrie hawara fieldwork methods |
| url | https://www.archaeologybulletin.org/articles/666 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT davidbrugger petrieathawarapioneeringdebatablestandards |