Long-term conservation practices reduce nitrate leaching while maintaining yields in tile-drained Midwestern soils

Nitrate-N losses from artificially drained agricultural fields lead to an acceleration of eutrophication and hypoxia in aquatic ecosystems. Adoption of conservation practices, such as cover crops and woodchip bioreactors, can significantly reduce nitrate losses and improve water quality. However, th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natalia Rogovska, Peter L. O’Brien, Rob Malone, Bryan Emmett, John L. Kovar, Dan Jaynes, Thomas Kaspar, Thomas B. Moorman, Peter Kyveryga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-10-01
Series:Agricultural Water Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423003463
_version_ 1797706867618611200
author Natalia Rogovska
Peter L. O’Brien
Rob Malone
Bryan Emmett
John L. Kovar
Dan Jaynes
Thomas Kaspar
Thomas B. Moorman
Peter Kyveryga
author_facet Natalia Rogovska
Peter L. O’Brien
Rob Malone
Bryan Emmett
John L. Kovar
Dan Jaynes
Thomas Kaspar
Thomas B. Moorman
Peter Kyveryga
author_sort Natalia Rogovska
collection DOAJ
description Nitrate-N losses from artificially drained agricultural fields lead to an acceleration of eutrophication and hypoxia in aquatic ecosystems. Adoption of conservation practices, such as cover crops and woodchip bioreactors, can significantly reduce nitrate losses and improve water quality. However, the long-term performance of these conservation practices and their effect on water quality has not been sufficiently quantified. A replicated plot experiment was initiated to quantify the long-term effectiveness of such conservation practices on nitrate-N removal rates from subsurface tile drains. Maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) were grown with three different treatments: 1) Control: no-till crop production, 2) no-till with a winter rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop (RC), and 3) no-till with an in-situ woodchip denitrification wall (DW) where trenches were excavated parallel to the tile on both sides and filled with woodchips to serve as additional carbon sources to increase denitrification. During a period of 19 years (2002–2020), all three treatments received the same annual N fertilization in maize years with rates ranging from 168 to 247 kg N/ha, depending on the production year. Averaged across the 19 years, the RC and DW treatments reduced N leaching by 59% and 58%, respectively, compared with the Control. Both conservation practices were effective for the duration of the study, and both were affected by annual rainfall. Effectiveness of RC increased in dry years, while effectiveness of DW increased in wet years. Overall, treatment and annual precipitation had the greatest effects on annual N loss in drainage. This suggests that the unpredictability of rainfall may make it difficult to consistently reduce nitrate losses in drainage, but it does not diminish the effectiveness of conservation practices. Minimal or no yield penalty was observed following adoption of cover crop or in-situ woodchip bioreactor conservation practices, which is important for their wider acceptance by the agriculture community.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T05:58:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9986cc4c05d24284aa630d768f015b92
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1873-2283
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T05:58:47Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Agricultural Water Management
spelling doaj.art-9986cc4c05d24284aa630d768f015b922023-09-03T04:23:26ZengElsevierAgricultural Water Management1873-22832023-10-01288108481Long-term conservation practices reduce nitrate leaching while maintaining yields in tile-drained Midwestern soilsNatalia Rogovska0Peter L. O’Brien1Rob Malone2Bryan Emmett3John L. Kovar4Dan Jaynes5Thomas Kaspar6Thomas B. Moorman7Peter Kyveryga8USDA ARS National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, IA, USA; Corresponding author.USDA ARS National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, IA, USAUSDA ARS National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, IA, USAUSDA ARS National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, IA, USAUSDA ARS National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, IA, USARetired from USDA ARS National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, IA, USARetired from USDA ARS National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, IA, USARetired from USDA ARS National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, IA, USAIowa State University, Department of Agronomy, Ames, IA, USANitrate-N losses from artificially drained agricultural fields lead to an acceleration of eutrophication and hypoxia in aquatic ecosystems. Adoption of conservation practices, such as cover crops and woodchip bioreactors, can significantly reduce nitrate losses and improve water quality. However, the long-term performance of these conservation practices and their effect on water quality has not been sufficiently quantified. A replicated plot experiment was initiated to quantify the long-term effectiveness of such conservation practices on nitrate-N removal rates from subsurface tile drains. Maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) were grown with three different treatments: 1) Control: no-till crop production, 2) no-till with a winter rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop (RC), and 3) no-till with an in-situ woodchip denitrification wall (DW) where trenches were excavated parallel to the tile on both sides and filled with woodchips to serve as additional carbon sources to increase denitrification. During a period of 19 years (2002–2020), all three treatments received the same annual N fertilization in maize years with rates ranging from 168 to 247 kg N/ha, depending on the production year. Averaged across the 19 years, the RC and DW treatments reduced N leaching by 59% and 58%, respectively, compared with the Control. Both conservation practices were effective for the duration of the study, and both were affected by annual rainfall. Effectiveness of RC increased in dry years, while effectiveness of DW increased in wet years. Overall, treatment and annual precipitation had the greatest effects on annual N loss in drainage. This suggests that the unpredictability of rainfall may make it difficult to consistently reduce nitrate losses in drainage, but it does not diminish the effectiveness of conservation practices. Minimal or no yield penalty was observed following adoption of cover crop or in-situ woodchip bioreactor conservation practices, which is important for their wider acceptance by the agriculture community.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423003463Water qualityRye cover cropIn-situ woodchip bioreactorTopographic position index
spellingShingle Natalia Rogovska
Peter L. O’Brien
Rob Malone
Bryan Emmett
John L. Kovar
Dan Jaynes
Thomas Kaspar
Thomas B. Moorman
Peter Kyveryga
Long-term conservation practices reduce nitrate leaching while maintaining yields in tile-drained Midwestern soils
Agricultural Water Management
Water quality
Rye cover crop
In-situ woodchip bioreactor
Topographic position index
title Long-term conservation practices reduce nitrate leaching while maintaining yields in tile-drained Midwestern soils
title_full Long-term conservation practices reduce nitrate leaching while maintaining yields in tile-drained Midwestern soils
title_fullStr Long-term conservation practices reduce nitrate leaching while maintaining yields in tile-drained Midwestern soils
title_full_unstemmed Long-term conservation practices reduce nitrate leaching while maintaining yields in tile-drained Midwestern soils
title_short Long-term conservation practices reduce nitrate leaching while maintaining yields in tile-drained Midwestern soils
title_sort long term conservation practices reduce nitrate leaching while maintaining yields in tile drained midwestern soils
topic Water quality
Rye cover crop
In-situ woodchip bioreactor
Topographic position index
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423003463
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliarogovska longtermconservationpracticesreducenitrateleachingwhilemaintainingyieldsintiledrainedmidwesternsoils
AT peterlobrien longtermconservationpracticesreducenitrateleachingwhilemaintainingyieldsintiledrainedmidwesternsoils
AT robmalone longtermconservationpracticesreducenitrateleachingwhilemaintainingyieldsintiledrainedmidwesternsoils
AT bryanemmett longtermconservationpracticesreducenitrateleachingwhilemaintainingyieldsintiledrainedmidwesternsoils
AT johnlkovar longtermconservationpracticesreducenitrateleachingwhilemaintainingyieldsintiledrainedmidwesternsoils
AT danjaynes longtermconservationpracticesreducenitrateleachingwhilemaintainingyieldsintiledrainedmidwesternsoils
AT thomaskaspar longtermconservationpracticesreducenitrateleachingwhilemaintainingyieldsintiledrainedmidwesternsoils
AT thomasbmoorman longtermconservationpracticesreducenitrateleachingwhilemaintainingyieldsintiledrainedmidwesternsoils
AT peterkyveryga longtermconservationpracticesreducenitrateleachingwhilemaintainingyieldsintiledrainedmidwesternsoils